Our view on the next CIA leader? Let’s stay with what’s been keeping us safe

BlueCollar follower Michael G asks if the Haspel nomination is a good one.

We agree with Senator Cotton.

In our considered opinion, various CIA operations have been protecting us over the last few years. They’re working, and Gina Haspel has been a strong part of that effort; so, if we’re allowed to use the Democrats’ own concerns against them…

…if she’s too tough on al-Qaedashe’s okay in our book.

What part of the Democrat message will resonate in Nov?

Despite all reports, it’s not gonna be easy for Democrat candidates in the Nov midterm.

Will trashing America’s President work for Democrats in the election?

So many options…and only 6 months to elections…

…what to do…what to do…?

Messaging? Hey…they got lots of stinking messaging.

Anyone remember that Iran never signed the Iran deal?

National Review headline

“State Department: Iran Deal Is Not ‘Legally Binding’ and Iran Didn’t Sign It”

Yet, after Trump says he’s dumping the deal, Obama, Kerry, and Democrats rage?

We admit a lack of nuance in this area…but…

…how is it a ‘deal’ if the target nation never signed it?

And, sorry, but faux angst over ‘America’s word being worthless‘ is disingenuous.

Congress – America’s representativedidn’t orchestrate this faulty back-room deal. It’s not a treaty, and was never going to move forward with a wary, wise American public.

This was ALL Obama.

Democrats – do you really want a 9/11 terrorist mastermind as an ally?

Washington Times headline: “9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed seeks to help Democrats opposing Trump CIA nominee”

We’re just guessing here…but what Democrat wants that on their campaign poster?

As if Republicans didn’t have enough ammo going into the midterm election with these Democrats supporting illegal immigration, Iran nukes, and promising tax hikes?

Yeah, yeah…embrace the 9/11 terrorist mastermind…that’s the ticket.

Obama’s Iran deal “made Iran better at war than it has ever been” and needed to be stopped

Nobody says it better than Andrew McCarthy…

“In point of fact, war was not the alternative to the (Obama-Iran deal) Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. War was the result of the JCPOA.”

(emphasis added)

When your child burns down the garage playing with matches, the solution isn’t to give the child a lighter and bundles of cash to encourage a more responsible attitude.

But that’s just what Obama and his toadie John Kerry did with Iran, the world’s leading sponsor of terror. And, predictably, with ugly resorts for the world order…

“…billions of dollars poured into Iran by Obama’s deal promptly poured out to Syria, where it funded both sides of the war. Cash flowed to the Taliban, where it funded the war on the American-backed government. It flowed to Hamas and Hezbollah for the war on Israel. It flowed to Yemen, funding a proxy war against Saudi Arabia.”

Talk about throwing gas on a fire.

President Trump gave Iran and co-signers of this travesty 16 months to fix the mess.

They didn’t, so he round-filed the agreement. We couldn’t agree more on his decision.

Democrat.org website lies, claiming ‘200 years the party led the fight for civil rights’

The Party of the KKK, Jim Crow segregation laws, and Bull Connor tactics has decided that the only way to deal with their racist history is to…LIE about their history.

Jeffrey Lord, writing an article lauding the honesty of Kanye West, says “The DNC website section labeled “Party History,” linked here, is in fact scrubbed clean of the not-so-little dirty secret that fueled Democrats’ political successes for over a century and a half and made American life a hell on earth for black Americans.”

He notes how, since at least 2008, the DNC decided to re-write their racist history, by skimming over or completely ignoring several very important contradictions/ommissions:

“Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were 6 from 1840-1860.”

“There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were 7 from 1800-1861”

“There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them.”

“There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner became “a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party”

“There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth banned slavery. The Fourteenth effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Supreme Court Dred Scott decision (made by Democrat pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The Fifteenth gave black Americans the right to vote.”

“There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of Democratic President Andrew Johnson.”

“There is no reference to the Democrats’ opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant.”

“There is no reference to four Democrat platforms, 1908-1920, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching, and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount.”

“There is no reference to the DNC-sponsored Democrat Convention of 1924, known to history as the “Klanbake.” The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan”

“There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who segregated the federal government of the United States, specifically at the direction of President Woodrow Wilson”

Well, now it looks like the illusion is complete, with a simple lie on their current website.

But don’t tell the black community…’cuz then they might listen to Kanye…

…and think for themselves.

‘What’s so bad about Mueller refusing a written interview process’?

Reader Debbie H responds to our earlier blog, asking “What’s so bad about Mueller refusing a written interview process?”

Well, let’s see, who can possibly see anything right about refusing a process that would allow everything to be on the record…and open to a deliberative thoughtful response?

The fact that ‘Mr. Integrity’ has a problem with such a suggestion might give some clue as to the nature of what, exactly, Mueller’s strategic objective might be…

…and it would be advisable for the President and his lawyers to keep that in mind.

How serious was an Iran nuclear deal when they wouldn’t even allow outside verification?

Let the wailing begin…President Trump withdraws from Obama’s lousy Iran deal.

But, honestly folks, can we be reasonable...what idiot wants the global leader in terrorism to dabble in a nuclear future…with ballistic missile capability?

And just as important… How serious was an Iran nuclear deal when Iranian leaders wouldn’t even allow independent outside verification of ‘agreement’ compliance?

And, quite frankly, WE DON’T CARE if the latest Israeli discoveries are real or fake…

…Iran was the leading nation of global terrorism support before those revelations came into play, and is still the leading global terror-state after – Israel’s news is a side issue.

No part of this Iran deal was good.