Headline: “Can Joe Beat Hillary With Black Voters?“

Yep…black voters have a real dilemma here.

Headline: “U.S. fails to stop flow of foreign fighters to Islamic State“

Does ANYONE in their right mind want these terror supporters to stay here?

Let’s rephrase the question…

Do Americans prefer to kill ISIS supporters on a foreign battle field, or spend their tax dollars on incarcerating them in America…for release at a later date?

Leftist Richard Cohen takes to the IBD pages to complain of Hillary treatment.

And, of course, uses the Washington Post to do the same.

The entire Obama team, including Hillary, stonewall Congress in its investigation of what happened before, during, and after Benghazi, and yet, delays caused by that stonewalling are seen as Republicans slow-walking a process…to hurt Hillary?

We assure Mr. Cohen that relatives of those killed in Benghazi want answers. He would too, if one of the Americans killed in that attack had been his son, or nephew.

Earth to Richard…how indifferent to their loss can you Liberals be?

You said it yourself, sir…“a terrorist attack in Libya is no laughing matter”…

…and we would add ‘…especially when Americans in Hillary’s State Dept are killed, after repeated emails TO HER – begging for more security – are ignored‘.

Just days ago, more hidden Benghazi emails of Hillary’s have surfaced…yet Cohen has the gall to believe it’s ‘Hillary-hatred’ that drives this Benghazi investigation?

Would he believe that, if it had been ‘Tyrone Cohen’ dead on a Benghazi rooftop?

Message to Richard Cohen: you’re no Diogenes.

(And, if you want to see a real ‘laughing matter‘…we suggest using a mirror.)

Now it’s Cooke, an NRO contributor, taking Carson to task…on a false premise.

Ben Carson’s first comment was on a matter of a president’s faith having to be, of necessity, consistent with American principles, values, and our Constitution.

BlueCollar detailed this several days ago, but if repetition is needed, fine.

Implying the question first asked was if Ben Carson would be okay with a Muslim president is a LIE. The first question asked was if a president’s FAITH matters.

And Carson’s first answer: “If it’s inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter. But if it fits within the realm of America…and consistent with the Constitution, no problem.” (emphasis added)

Then, asked if he thought Islam was consistent with our Constitution, he said no.

So, before Dr. Carson ever came out to say he would not advocate a Muslim for president, he qualified his answer within a context of constitutional consistency.

Only by falsely implying that his ‘no Muslim’ statement stood on its own could one make the giant conclusive leap that Ben Carson made a bigoted statement.

If our Constitution is ‘the law of the land’, then no faith can be above that law…in order to be consistent with American values and principles – will Islam submit?

Message to conservatives – use honest concepts, not contorted premise, to rebut GOP candidates. Please, leave the distorting and conniving to Democrats.

No amount of lies will deter the Left from smearing Republican candidates…

…we wonder why that principle has now been adopted by the Right?

Raise the minimum wage! Strengthen welfare safety nets! Increase health benefits!

These are the foundational arguments of Democrat vote-seeking politicians. These are policies, they claim, which help improve the plight of the lesser fortunate…yet…

Witness Puerto Rico…a withering example of those very policies.

The federal minimum wage of $7.25/hr is equal to $20/hr based on their economy, and the welfare, food stamps, and Medicaid benefits amount to even more…

…resulting in a destroyed private sector that can’t bear the financial costs.

No private sector, no jobs…unless you’re lucky enough to get a public-sector job.

It’s no surprise, then, to learn only 40% of Puerto Rico’s adults are working.

No jobs, no tax revenue. Puerto Rico can’t pay bondholder debt…it’s bankrupt…

…as are DEMOCRAT ‘solutions’.

No clearer example is needed to prove throwing more money at issues is stupid.

Any questions?

John Boehner’s sudden announced retirement from the House of Representatives brings up the edgy issue of politicians making promises they ignore, once elected.

Why not require candidates to sign a pledge to ‘walk the talk’…or step down?

Rush Limbaugh‘s search for a Liberal with a sense of humor may be over.

Juan Williams is about as Liberal as they get. And, proudly, BlueCollar has a track record of being diametrically opposed to virtually every Liberal policy imaginable.

But when Williams comes out calling for Democrats in the next election cycle to ‘embrace the Obama economy‘ rather than run from it, we support that sentiment.

(The numbers should tell you why, but Juan seems oblivious to them.)

He cites ‘low unemployment’, when everyone but the latest illegal alien knows that the unemployment figures Obama’s lackeys post are as bogus as Hillary’s laugh.

He cites ‘job growth’, failing to mention we’re 6.5 million short of where it should be.

And nowhere does he mention the historically low Labor Participation Rate which, when taken into consideration, exposes the failure of this Obama economy.

Oddly, he brags of the historic high of Wall Street numbers, but forgets the declining household income of the low- and middle-class, obviously not able to connect the 2 dots…which explains a growing wealth gap they usually rage against!

He cites low gas prices…a result of private sector fracking in spite of Obama policy.

We could go on, but don’t want to put a damper on Juan’s message. So, please, yes, Democrat candidates…we beg you…embrace Obama’s loser economy.

Ignore the fact that people are fleeing Democrat-policy states for GOP-states.

Wave that ‘we love Obamanomics’ flag bravely, Democrats. Walk tall.

We look forward to that debate.

So Obama stands at the UN dais, and warns Putin he has the strongest military.

Sadly, he doesn’t see what it says about him, that he has to declare the obvious.

But Putin knows having a strong military, and USING it, are two different things.

To him, Obama’s weakness on enforcing ‘red lines’ has been all too clear.

Someone should try explaining that to the paper tiger in 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

(And please hurry…as Putin uses Russian might to exert its presence in the Middle East, Obama would be well advised that alliances can be a shifting commodity.)

For all the hoopla over how high Trump’s numbers poll, we continue to believe it’s the message, not the messenger, that resonates with the GOP populace.

As this NRO article points out, a job that’s ALL about character will not fit him well.

Those who doubt Big Business-types are in the Democrats’ pocket need only look at the Obama years for proof…Tom Steyer, Warren Buffet are big crony recipients.

And Trump’s a Big-money guy, switching parties like we change a belt. Besides, it’s a giant leap between selling a message, and implementing that message.

Trump can sell, but in the end, he swims with the tide. BlueCollar continues to see him as a stalking horse for Hillary, distracting the masses during her difficulties.

Multiple bankruptcies, multiple wives, multiple political Parties…

…Trump’s history is all about selling out principle for personal gain.

His expedient message may resonate…but his PAST tells the story.

You can trust he’ll swim with Democrats again, when it serves his purpose.

Congress needs to pass budget matters and send the legislation to Obama.

Their legislation should be consistent with views of that governing body. They are the people’s choice, sent to Congress to do the people’s work…not Obama’s.

If Obama chooses to veto budget bills and shut down government, it’s on him.