Hmmm…when did defending oneself from injustice become obstruction of JUSTICE…?

It begs the question.

Democrats are hell-bent on damaging/delegitimizing/impeaching/whatever President Trump; since Mueller et al couldn’t find evidence of collusion, fallback is ‘obstruction’.

Problem is, as pointed out in our previous post – the entire 2+year harassment of the President has been ENTIRELY predicated on Democrat-funded activities

  1. Russian ‘hacking’ was never independently verified by federal agencies, who were denied computer server access…relying on Democrat-funded CrowdStrike data;
  2. Russian ‘collusion’ was primarily founded on the Democrat-funded dirt dossier.

So the INJUSTICE known as the Mueller probe commenced, hounding GOP aides and the President, diminishing his election victory, hamstringing his efforts in office, and as he fought back against what he knew to be a hoax…he’s accused of ‘obstruction’…

…by the very Party ORCHESTRATING the Injustice.

We ask again…

…when did defending oneself from injustice become obstruction of JUSTICE…?

What Mueller’s report WON’T admit: the probe was ENTIRELY based on Democrat-contracted findings

The ‘hacked’ Democrat servers (used as the foundation of Russian ‘collusion’ activities) were NEVER forensically investigated by federal agencies and NEVER turned over to those agencies…instead, all was based on a Democrat-contracted private firm finding.

In addition, the Steele dirt-dossier was funded by the DNC and Hillary’s campaign, and then COMBINED with the Democrat-contracted private firm finding to claim collusion.

Got that?

The entire hoax was predicated on Democrat-funded chicanery, start to finish.

And you can bet this will not be anything other than a footnote in Mueller’s report.

(UPDATED – based on BlueCollar’s report review)


The unredacted sections of the Mueller report fail to note federal agencies were not allowed access to the ‘hacked’ data that got this investigation started. There would be no plausible reason to redact such a fundamental issue to this probe.

Re, Volume I, item III ‘Russian Hacking and Dumping Operations’ pages 36 through 63; as suspected, NOWHERE in the unredacted sections does the report note that findings of hacking were a result of a Democrat-contracted private firm’s investigative analysis.

Similarly, Vol. I, item V, sect. B ‘Russian Hacking and Dumping Operations’ pages 175 through 179 make NO mention findings were based on Democrat-funded CrowdStrike.

And nowhere does it mention Democrats refused to turn over servers to fed agencies.

(We found only one vague footnote, attributed to a ‘CrowdStrike blog’ at page 42, footnote #145, but nowhere else was the firm CrowdStrike even mentioned.)

How a federally-conducted investigation into the computer-intrusive mechanisms fail to note this CRUCIAL information that no federal agency examined servers is a mystery.

And, please, no ‘Papadopoulos-Russia-meet preceded any hacking, thus causing the probe’ claims: remember, even the DNC states in a lawsuit that the ‘hacking’ started in 2015. Papadopoulos interviewed for a Trump campaign spot in March, 2016.

The DNC-lawsuit claims are, no doubt, based on private-contractor analysis; we can assume with a high degree of confidence no federal agency saw their servers…at all.

The partisan FBI-CIA lures were put in place to entrap Trump aides after supposed hacking had begun, but no federal agency has forensically verified Democrat claims.

Those human lures conspired to engage Trump aides in seeking ‘hacked’ data, then when useful idiots like Papadopoulos referred to such data, the game was on.

NOWHERE are these facts mentioned in Mueller’s redacted report.

30 million taxpayer dollars and 2-yrs of Trump ankle-biting, ‘cuz of a Democrat hoax.

Hillary and Obama must be smiling.

…’cuz, you know…timing is everything when it’s not going THEIR way…

What was the Attorney General thinking? Daily Caller headline: “Dems Furious Barr Will Hold Press Conference Before Report Is Sent To Congress” (underline added)

Doesn’t he know distortions are more difficult if attempted after his press conference?

There’s a traditional pattern at stake here: give Congress the report FIRST; distorting leaks get out to the media SECOND; resulting denials are downplayed THIRD

…and Republicans bow to the Democrats FOURTH.

O-M-G…shouldn’t the Attorney General have known this by now?

What did Socialists use for lighting before candles? Answer: Electricity

The joke that ‘socialists used electricity for lighting before candles’ is used to highlight fact: that Socialism, despite promises, fails to deliver…plunging nations into darkness.

History is replete with failure when it comes to regimes that embrace/d socialism.

The latest is Venezuela.

With photos of Venezuelans plundering garbage for food, another tragic joke emerges.

Where did Venezuelan Socialists eat before garbage cans? Answer: restaurants.

Next time you hear American Millennials enthralled with a Socialist utopia concept, you could point these jokes out and ask if they want to be a cause of the next socialist joke:

How did Millennials communicate, before smoke signals? Answer: cellphones.

Maybe that will snap them out of it.

…no, no, no; we weren’t ‘spying’…we were, uhhh, surveilling…

Disgraced (former) FBI Dir. Comey is shocked, shocked, that anyone would have the audacity to suggest that spying on the Trump campaign occurred on his watch.

‘No, no’ he moans…‘that was court-authorized surveillance…not spying.’

Spying, you see, is when the bad guys do it. (‘Cuz, you know, hey, if a court says its okay, then that’s a different story, that’s a game-changer right there, ya know buddy?)

OK, Jim’bo…let’s unpack that.

The court-authorized activities that you lean on in order to justify ‘surveillance’ was achieved by lying to a federal court...which is not something done by the good guys.

Whoa, hey…we’re done so soon? Sometimes unpacking can be so easy.

Joe, is Mika that good, that you’re okay with be-clowning yourself this way?

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough thinks Russia-collusion spying ‘was done by the book’.

Mika must be that hot, that Joe would make himself look that stupid.

Otherwise, how can this idiot ignore the FISA abuses that PROVABLY formed the basis to the intel-agencies for their FISC court surveillance applications? Or ignore that FBI Dir. Comey failed to notify Congress of the investigation, as required by federal law?

How does he square the endless leaks serving to fuel the fires of a hoax investigation?

Or the agency lures set up in attempts to entrap Trump campaign aides, and the real, widespread (not to mention) unethical use of unmasking Americans by Obama-ites?

Seriously, Joe…she can’t be THAT good.

From bare-breasted commies to full-breasted courtesans, the Democrat field has them all

One reveled with Commie leaders in Russia, another slept her way to the top of politics in California. One fed his wife dirty-diaper burritos, another says gayness is God-gifted.

This is a clown-car writ large, heading toward a Thelma-Louise cliff, pedal to the metal.

They support the killing of newborn babies, and unsecure open borders (with just 1 caveat: be sure illegal alien distribution buses don’t stop anywhere near their homes).

The Democrat best and brightest? If it weren’t so hilariously entertaining, it’d be tragic.

But then, what can one expect? After all, it’s the same Party that trotted out Hillary.

Talk about an ‘abortion in the making’ – fielding these kinds of candidates, the Party-of-Abortion has extended that questionable practice…to include their own.