“How many COVID booster shots will finally be enough?” When Republicans disappear

A recent American Thinker article notes that “The advent of the COVID pandemic has been a political windfall for the Democrats beyond any possible measure.”

‘Windfall’? There’s no better way to control an electorate than through the use of fear, and the 2016 election win by Trump convinced Democrats to go all out in 2020.

What else explains efforts to misconstrue WuFlu cases, deaths, and hospitalizations that have been clearly and irrefutably documented over the last year and a half?

We believe the pandemic (and accompanying hysteria) was deliberately fabricated to justify the ‘need’ for mail-in balloting…a mechanism that enables wholesale vote fraud.

So, when we see yesterday’s article asking “How many COVID booster shots will finally be enough?” it should be apparent to any political wonk that the answer is obvious…

…booster shots will no longer be needed when Democrats no longer have opposition.

Until then, expect their booster-mania to continue…to justify mail-in balloting.

It’s the only way Democrats can guarantee winning elections.

For them, winning elections is what it’s all about.

And for those who ask ‘Why Blame Democrats?’ we submit to you that no other Party would receive the whole-hearted support of main-stream (so-called) media.

It’s a Democrat-fabricated pandemic…and it will last til the last Republican’s gone.

Is that EUA protecting Big Pharma even legit a little bit?

So, the Emergency Use Authorization declaration for the WuFlu ‘vaccines’ was issued March 2020, and the CDC actually changed the definition of vaccine to accommodate its ineffectiveness to immunize sometime in September 2021…

…which begs the question: Is that EUA even legitimate?

After all, issuing an EUA for a ‘vaccine’ that 18 MONTHS LATER becomes redefined as not really a vaccine delegitimizes all protections afforded an immunity-capable product.

And this article at the American Thinker “What if the COVID-19 vaccines are not really vaccines?” brings that question full circle…if not a vaccine, is it even protected?

(The article makes the case they’re really “experimental gene therapies” and, according to the expert quoted, Moderna & Pfizer “classify their products as ‘gene therapy”.)

All this begs an even more interesting question: Are there any lawyers in the house?

Or, are they already too intimidated by the inevitable Gov’t/BigPharma legal juggernaut that awaits any who have the audacity to question what are very legitimate concerns?

Of course, this is all academic – we’re sure the elitists have already covered their tracks with amendments to original declarations…or they’ll find ’em, in a drawer somewhere.

Ineffective, Illegal, Immoral…& Deadly – why is there even a conversation on ‘vaccine’ mandates???

I mean, really…why are we having a vaccine-mandate discussion?

The vaccines being administered are NOT FDA approved; federal law states no one can be forced to take experimental treatments; and adverse events are out of control.

Pro-vaxers claim a vaccine mandate is for the common good.

Since when has reinstating segregation, violating civil rights, breaking federal law, and imposing serious medical conditions – up to and including death – on a segment of the population become the norm…for the ‘common good’?

Especially when medical experts refuse to be open about vaccine consequences?

Well, hey – in an America where elites tell us men competing against women is ‘fair’…& BLM rioting which destroyed tens of thousands of businesses was, you know, ‘mostly peaceful’…does common sense or logic in this WuFlu/Covid hysteria need apply?

In an America where the only FDA-approved WuFlu/Covid vaccines – have been – and continue to be unavailable, & “will be for the foreseeable future” ACCORDING TO THE FDA…why let cognitive reasoning about what’s happening cloud your perceptions?

But, sarcasm aside…facts speak for themselves.

Seriously…the real question is why do vaccine-mandate discussions continue?