Why would this surprise anyone…?

This story is going to have long-term ramifications.

Millennials care more about date’s politics than good sex: survey

“The number of millennial men and women who prioritize political party alliance over good sex has skyrocketed since 2016, according to data from OkCupid. The matchmaking company surveyed more than 8 million users, and found that interest in dating someone with similar political beliefs has gone up 165 percent since 2004, while having good sex has decreased as a priority 30 percent…between 2016 and 2018, the number of women who consider politics more important than sex shot up from 27 percent to 42 percent, while for men that needle moved from 23 percent to 30 percent. So what’s the link? Manhattan sex therapist Megan Fleming thinks dating strictly within one’s party is making people comfortable…”

We’ll take this a little further than a desire to feel ‘comfortable’…many so inclined to not ‘sleep with the enemy’ do so because they’re unable to square political views honestly.

From unsecure open borders to infanticide, one political Party puts Americans, born and yet unborn, at risk. What part of infanticide is acceptable to an honest adult?

Honesty requires an open exchange of ideas to justify a position on issues. One Party has now come out as open to killing newborn babies…on the altar of Abortion. In what universe could any decent person argue this as a ‘good idea’?

As for open border advocates, how can they possibly argue for a policy that every drug cartel, sex trafficker, and terrorist group agrees with…to make their goal achievable?

This study isn’t about comfort zones…it’s about political positions gone crazy.

Party differences used to be about Big-vs-Small government, entitlements as opposed to short-term safety nets, and the need for high taxes compared to low-tax benefits.

Not anymore. It’s now devolved to the lowest elements of human nature.

It’s about Logic and Reason…those who have it, those who don’t

…and how they’re able to sleep with the differences.

Clinging to GOP dead, when they’re not maligning GOP dead

The Left and never-Trump’ers, ever buttressed by FakeNews, are aghast…aghast…at the President’s attacks against one of his saboteurs, a dead now-lionized John McCain.

Funny…the Left and their media heavies, to this day, have no problem sliming Reagan.

The difference?

John McCain WAS a saboteur of Donald Trump during his campaign, and of now-President Trump after, ensuring wide dissemination of the unfounded slime-dossier.

(Ronald Reagan, on the other hand, is routinely slimed with LIES.)

So, as news comes out about exactly how involved McCain was in the ‘hoax-that-will-never-die Russia collusion’ meme, the President – as its target – has a right to speak.

So what if McCain’s dead? The result of his activities aren’t – and lest any forget, those activities involved machinations intended to delegitimize an American election…

…and a sitting American President…while McCain was in a position of public trust.

Some would call that TREASON.

Anyone who doesn’t like it can complain all they want – facts don’t lie.

Trump fights back – even when his back-stabbers are in the grave. Live with it.

Buying an impeachment…Soros/Steyer-style

“Trump-Russia 2.0: Dossier-Tied Firm Pitching Journalists Daily on ‘Collusion'”

RealClearInvestigations journalist Paul Sperry writes Key Democratic operatives and private investigators who tried to derail Donald Trump’s campaign by claiming he was a tool of the Kremlin have rebooted their operation since his election with a multimillion-dollar stealth campaign to persuade major media outlets and lawmakers that the president should be impeached.” (bold, underline emphasis added)

Buying elections, buying impeachments…

…it’s a never-ending story when Democrats are involved.

Hey, Justice Dept: When does their madness descend to ‘sedition’ level?

Liberal whackos rage over electoral college post, but facts are hard to deny

Our electoral college post claiming states give up their vote to California may drive the liberal crowd bat-crap crazy, but anyone willing to look at facts must admit the obvious.

Sure, Hillary won the popular vote by some 2.9 million votes, but California went Hillary by 4.2 million votes, which means, absent California, Trump won the popular vote.



Relying on an electoral system effectively prevents a few populous regions from taking charge of the election process, spreading that decision across all 50 states instead.

It’s like baseball, where the World Series is decided by the number of games won, not the number of total runs scored…otherwise, a team scoring a huge amount of runs in one winning game could become champions even if they lost 6 games of 7 played.

Those states willing to direct electoral votes to a total national popular vote subjugates its vote to California, with the 2016 national election results demonstrating that fact.

Facts are a hard thing to deny.

The REAL racists are those who corrupt truth to spread racism LIES

For 19 months the Left’s ‘Trump’s a racist’ meme has been pushed, fed in large part by the NONreporting of what he said during his August 15, 2017 Charlottesville presser.

FakeNews conflated his ‘there were very fine people’ remark (about those involved in the issue of taking down a Robert E. Lee statue) to include white supremacists.

FakeNews DELIBERATELY leaves out that President Trump noted very specifically within that SAME press conference “and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally”…exposing their deceit.

Here’s the excerpt of the relevant part of his presser (emphasis added): “You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. … You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statute and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down statutes to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think about Thomas Jefferson? Do you like him? Are we going to take down his statute? Because he was a major slave-owner. Now are we going to take down his statute? You’re changing history. You’re changing culture, and you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”

Make no mistake – The real racists are those who corrupt truth to spread racism lies.

FakeNews? YOU BET.

With daily confirmation of its ‘HOAX’ status, collusion probe can only be legitimized one way…

With daily confirmation of its ‘HOAX’ status, the collusion probe conducted by Robert Mueller can only be legitimized one way…if it incriminates the hoax perpetrators:

  • The creators of the unsubstantiated dirt-dossier as a basis for ‘collusion’;
  • the distributors of that unsubstantiated dirt-dossier;
  • the political Party that funded the unsubstantiated dirt-dossier;
  • the FISA fraudsters who used the unsubstantiated dirt-dossier for warrants;
  • the leadership (including Obama) who allowed this circus to unfold.

Any other result will just verify what Pres Trump calls this fiasco…a WITCH-HUNT.

Why are states willing to GIVE their electoral votes to California?

Our electoral college process is provided for by the Constitution in order to ensure each state has a voice in national politics where the Executive branch is concerned. If not for that process, the President could be chosen by a very few states with large populations.

But now, it seems 11 states and the District of Columbia are signing on to a ‘National Popular Vote Interstate Compact’ that gives its electoral votes to a popular vote winner.

Many of those states had given their electoral votes to the winner in those states; this change means votes of the entire country will coerce how these 11 states vote…

…NOT the votes of their own citizenry.

Consider this – absent California, Donald Trump won the popular vote (and we won’t even mention how many illegal aliens voted in that Left Coast sanctuary nightmare).

Remember, the state of California closes its poll last (except for Hawaii), and that it’s the most populous state in the Union (11 million MORE than next-ranked Texas).

This means a heavily-slanted Party vote within that state would force 11 states to vote as California did electorally…even if Party vote margins are equal or opposite that state.

The top 4 states in population have over 1/3 of the entire Nation’s population. Founding Fathers recognized that potential over-balance, and electorally rectified the situation.

Why citizens of 11 states and DC are willing to give up their vote is a mystery.

PREDICTION: Expect lawsuits after every election where the majority of votes within those 11 states are nullified by national popular vote margins for an opposition Party.

Ironically, many Democrat presidential hopefuls maintain eliminating the electoral process makes votes count, when, actually, the opposite is true…

but that won’t stop them from perpetuating the lie.

Which House members didn’t vote on the resolution demanding Mueller report be made public?

420 House members voted on a resolution to make the Mueller report public.

(By law special counsel reports are held to be confidential by the AG, which explains why it’s a resolution, not a bill. Pres Trump tweeted support for making it public.)

There are 435 members in the House, four Republicans voted present, leaving eleven unaccounted for; media is curiously silent on who those eleven non-voters were…

…which begs the question.

Is it possible there may be certain anti-Trump’er House members running for cover?