Margot Cleveland, at the Federalist asks the 64-dollar question: “…answering the bottom-line question plaguing Barr: “How did we get to the point here where the evidence is now that the president was falsely accused of colluding with the Russians and accused of being treasonous and accused of being a Russian agent?”

We would add: falsely accused by those provably GUILTY of those same acts. 

Colluding with foreign actors, treasonously using Russian disinformation for the purpose of election-interference, and by that act…in effect, performing as a Russian agent.

Key indications things won’t go their way is Mueller stalling Nadler’s call for appearing at a House Judiciary hearing…maybe because of all that’s been revealed up to now?

On top of DOSSIER-gate, FISA-gate, and LEAK-gate…now LURE-gate again is news.

Seems the ‘dossier’ author Steele admitted one of his so-called Russian sources for the disinformation used in the dirt-dossier was a long-time associate of FBI/CIA lure Halper.

From probably illegal acts that began the spying on Trump’s campaign, and revelations learned since, Mueller may not want to be asked WHY he failed to probe certain areas.

Certain areas, specifically, which incriminates the Democrat Party in this hoax. Mueller may not be interested in addressing those issues…but AG Barr certainly looks curious.

It just keeps on coming, Hillary. Not sure how you and your Party gets out of this one.

Every accusation the Trump opposition throws out blows up in their face, because it all leads back to…the Trump opposition hoaxsters – which begs a very real question:

Are they willing to listen to the TRUTH when AG Barr gets to the bottom of this hoax?

As speculation and predictions mount, the Dept of Justice Insp Gen’l report on FISA app abuse is to be released soon. Sources say the results will be damning, for many.

That said, we can’t help but ask…what honest FISC judge would not realize that, when a target of a FISA app ensnares a presidential candidate, stricter scrutiny was needed?

Lost in the hand-rubbing glee at prospects of FBI heavy-weights and lackeys being frog-marched to court, is one salient fact – a FISC judge should’ve demanded solid proof.

Not just ‘trust me, judge’…not hearsay, or 2nd/3rd-hand sourcing.

Not when the target was part of a presidential campaign of an opponent Party. That’s politically charged to the max: any judge worth their salt should’ve required factual data.

SOLID CORROBORATION.

Wrong-doers should be prosecuted…judges enabling chicanery should be, too.

Politico: “Nadler squeezed with calls for ‘inherent contempt’”

Democrat court jesters hold forth in the public square formerly known as the House of Representatives, wailing, gnashing teeth, tearing at their hair and ripping garments…

…’cuz they can’t get the President to cooperate with their ‘impeach’ agenda.

The real tragedy here is they get paid with tax-dollars to continue their farce.

Hey, Nadler…that’s UNENDING Contempt you hear throughout America…

…’inherent’ goes without saying.

Ugly truth: at Issues-&-Insights today: “While federal revenues are $35 billion higher so far this year than last, spending is up by $181 billion. And while revenues for the entire year will climb $109 billion, that won’t be nearly enough to keep pace with the $421 billion hike in spending, according to current Treasury forecasts.” (emphasis added)

Let that sink in: GOP tax cuts foster a booming economy, and gov’t gets more revenue but then, turns around and spends 3.8 times MORE than the increased revenues.

The clown-car filled with Democrat hopefuls (23 by last count) claim that deficit growth is because of Republican tax-cuts they plan to end, but the real culprit is SPENDING.

Do the math…

…any fool knows what happens when they spend 3.8x more than their income.

Except, of course…Democrat politicians (and their media accomplices).

The only difference is, they’re overspending OUR money.

In a business, if the CEO allowed 3.8 times more spending than that business took in, owners – without hesitation – would throw that CEO out the door in a heartbeat…

…and we should do the same with spend-crazy politicians.

As pro-Life legislators across the fruited plain draw-up the fetal heartbeat legislation that they hope will create challenge to never-voted-on Judicially Legislated ‘Roe-v-Wade’…

…we thought it appropriate timing to note the context of the Founders’ phrasing within our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

But, maybe ‘context’ isn’t the right wording sufficient to highlight their focus.

Linear priority could better capture the spirit of the Founders’ intent: ‘Life’ must be first in line, for without it there can’t be any ‘Liberty’ or ‘pursuit of Happiness’ as rights to claim.

For those who would split hairs on when Life commences, or suggest it’s not a Life until born, we wonder how any can be so obtuse as to not believe ‘conception’ is the key?

After all…without conception there is no Life.

Sadly, we acknowledge there are some that will NEVER accept such basic logic, and we also realize that there are extenuating circumstances that could justify abortion.

But regardless, Life shouldn’t be held in cheap regard.

Believing in the sanctity of Life, abortion shouldn’t be a matter of mere convenience.

And, fortunately, that belief is gender-neutral.

Arguably, the nomination of the Queen-of-Corrupt-Cronyism as their presidential hope is the crowning idiocy that brought Donald Trump to the fore of Republican candidates.

If any Democrat epitomizes all that’s wrong in politics, it’s Hillary Clinton…

…the Princess-of-Political-Expedience & Pay-to-Play-Largesse, the Empress-of-Except-Me law enforcement, the Duchess-of-Dirty-Tricks, & Baroness-of-Backroom-Deals.

Nothing could’ve made voters want ‘anything-but-a-politician’ in the White House more.

The crowning idiocy of Democrats nominating such a flawed candidate was shocking.

And, as usual, give a shout-out to a duplicitous media for enabling the inevitable…

…President Donald J. Trump.

Thanks, everyone. We couldn’t have done it without you.

An article today at Breitbart.com about Donald Trump Jr agreeing to appear before the Senate Intelligence (oxymoronic, we know) committee, has this to say on the issue:

“While Trump, Jr. had been signaling that he might blow off the subpoena entirely, his intent – sources close to him say – has always been to be helpful. He had offered to answer more questions in writing, and even to testify in person again with a time and scope limitation–something Burr and Senate Intelligence Committee officials previously opposed. Now, after allies of Trump, Jr., and Republicans party-wide rejected Burr’s original subpoena, with a fierce public backlash, Burr has cut a deal to limit the time and scope of the subpoena…” That’s all fine and dandy, but it begs an important question.

Donald Trump Jr, his dad, and the campaign as a whole, were targeted…not complicit.

When an investigation is premised on a HOAX…shouldn’t focus be on its perpetrators?

If the Committee chairman (Republican Senator Richard Burr) was honest and fair, he’d open the meeting, present the attending Trump Jr, apologize for duplicitous politicians…

…condemn THEIR actions…and CLOSE THE MEETING.

Andrew McCarthy with a piercing analysis of the Russia-collusion hoax investigation:

Democrats are guilty of “…perverting the criminal-justice process they claim Trump has obstructed. With the transparently eager cooperation of Mueller’s team, they intimate that the president could have been charged and would have been convicted. They suggest that, although not charged, he has not been “exonerated,” effectively imposing on him the burden to establish his innocence. That is, they are doing what they accuse Trump of doing.” (And that is “..a willful undermining of the justice process.”)

He makes the case that, by September 2017, a mere 5 months after the special counsel investigation started “…the Justice Department stopped seeking surveillance warrants — i.e., it decided to stop peddling the Steele dossier to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.” (Which means there was nothing provable in their dossier.)

Indictments handed down after that were against Russian entities, based on forensic analysis of servers by a private (Democrat-funded) firm – CrowdStrike…not based on information as provided by what’s since proven to be phony opposition disinformation.

And, ‘lest anyone forget…

…Democrats never allowed federal investigator access to so-called ‘hacked’ servers.

McCarthy’s summary destroys the Democrat hoax: “The Russia counterintelligence probe, based on the fraudulent projection of a Trump-Putin conspiracy, was always a pretext to conduct a criminal investigation despite the absence of a predicate crime. The criminal investigation, in turn, was always a pretext for congressional impeachment chatter. And the congressional impeachment chatter is a pretext for the real agenda: Making Trump an ineffective president now, and an un-reelectable president 18 months from now. They try to make it look like law. It has always been politics.“

Case closed? Against Pres Trump-&-team…sure. Against Democrats? NOT YET.

Not yet – now, it’s time for the hoaxers to be thoroughly investigated.

“ICE breaks up massive Houston-based marriage fraud scheme”

According to the article, “‘Marriage fraud is a serious crime’, said District Director Tony Bryson from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Houston.”

If that’s true, how does Ilhan Omar get away with (allegedly) marrying her brother?

At TheHill.com: “Biden rips Giuliani for threatening to investigate his son” O-M-G…when did investigating Democrats become legal?

See, it’s okay to harass a Republican President’s son, but a Democrat…?

The irony drips…

…congressional democrats (intentionally writ small) are harassing the son of President Trump – based on a hoax…but are outraged over investigating a Democrat…

…based on provable unethical foreign connections.

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up.

(Can’t wait ’til the whole Biden-China-connection thing comes into play.)