Passing laws, then blaming ‘enforcement’ as the problem…?

Fact checkers can spin this administration’s ‘zero-tolerance’ enforcement decision of the immigration laws so it makes Republicans the bad guys, but it doesn’t change facts.

Entering the USA illegally is a crime; a misdemeanor the first time, a felony after that.

And, guess what…committing a crime, while children are in your custody is defined by law as child endangerment – especially when 80% of those kids aren’t with parents.

If you jay-walk a high-traffic intersection with your 6-month old son in your arms, not only did you commit a misdemeanor…you endangered your child. If you rob a bank with that 6-month old in your arms, you committed a felony while endangering him.

In either case, while you’re in custody and being processed as an adult through the legal system (which involves, at some point, confinement in an adult-populated holding area), of course the child must be adequately cared for in a non-endangered manner.

How is what’s happening at the southern border any different?


There are procedures in place for immigrating to America. Those who violate the system – with or without kids in tow – deserve no special treatment. They broke the law.

And don’t blame those enforcing the law.

Use common sense…don’t let these Left-wing emotion-whores cloud your judgment.

Final word – whether by law or by executive action…

…Obama and his Democrat cohort encouraged this border behavior for 8 years, thus CREATING yet another crisis they now politically exploit…the blame falls on them.

The height of political hypocrisy is to make law, then vilify those who enforce it.

If ‘asylum’ seekers w-kids are gumming up the system, why not deport them to port-of-entry sites?

For legitimate or illegitimate reasons, illegal aliens use children to try getting into the U.S. faster; and when claiming asylum, the law says kids can’t be held past 2 days.

NRO’s Rich Lowry explains in more detail, but let’s cut to the chase…

…asylum seekers should do the right thing, and go through a port-of-entry process.

As it stands, illegal alien kids are clogging up the system, because the adults who drag them in try the ‘asylum’ dodge, knowing the law says kids can’t be held past 20 days.

Those who try the illegal route should be deported to the closest port-of-entry…

…WITH the kids they’re using as asylum-shields.

When did abortion-lovers start caring about kids…and demanding Trump go dictatorial?

Begs the question.

How can the same Party that champions wholesale abortion pose as caring about kids?

Don’t you wish unborn American kids received as much concern as illegal alien kids?

And, how is it the same Leftists who rage falsely about President Trump acting like a dictator, suddenly demand that he do something dictatorial about immigration law?

(Remember – Congress makes the law…the Executive branch enforces the law.)

Just askin’…

Another week, another fabricated crisis…& another case of media neglect

“Obama administration placed children with human traffickers, report says”

The Obama administration allowed over 125,000 illegal children into the United States, and Democrats have the nerve NOW to complain about how illegal kids are handled?

Is there a crisis in this country that HASN’T been fabricated by Democrats?

What honest media gives credibility to those who create a crisis…then exploit it?

Bottom line: if Democrats refuse to support the GOP legislation to fix the problem…

…they ARE the PROBLEM.

Remember – No new law has been enacted since Republicans came to power in Congress. No new executive action has been ordered by Pres Trump. The law being enforced is the same law that Obama and his administration enforced for years.

Another example that reveals Democrats are in the pockets of Big Business

“How Dodd-Frank Stole The Recovery By Killing Small-Business Growth”

Dodd-Frank was passed in 2010 by a Democrat-controlled Congress, ostensibly to corral Wall Street ‘fatcat’ bankers…but was actually a law that FAVORED those fatcats.

A new study says “…damage done…to small businesses was severe…and made it more difficult for small businesses and entrepreneurs to obtain funding…” 

IBD notes “Smaller banks, which mainly do only small-business loans, saw their loan volumes decline by twice as much. This is why there has been a silent depression in the once-vibrant small-bank industry. Meanwhile, loans of over $1 million by bigger banks have soared by 80%. Obama and the Democrats were the least small-business friendly administration and Congress since the Great Depression.”

Long story short – Democrats in the pocket of Big Banking hurt small banking.

Next time Democrats wail about the GOP favoring ‘Fatcat Bankers’ ask them how it can be, when Democrat legislation – that favored those fatcats – has now been checked

…by Pres Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress.


First page of IG report shows the fix was in on the Hillary email probe review

You don’t have to go beyond the first page of the Executive Summary at the beginning of the DOJ Inspector General’s report to realize the fix was in on whitewashing Hillary.

If there’s any saving grace at all…if nothing else, considering the report’s a 568-page document, they did everyone a favor by showing their hand on the very first page.

FACT: The IG never interviewed the man in charge – Barack Hussein Obama.

FACT: The IG managed to squeeze in ‘intent’ as a criteria, when it shouldn’t be.

Obama, as president, was in charge of the Executive branch, and even the IG rpt (pg 66) couldn’t ignore the fact his comments at the probe’s onset sent a clear message to those conducting it, saying Hillary just made a ‘mistake’, and no ‘intent’ was involved.

As noted in an IBD article “…while the IG might not have found smoking-gun evidence of political bias in the investigation, the report makes it clear that the entire investigation was biased from the start” (when Obama’s comments set the tone and false premise).

So, the IG noted Obama, everyone’s boss, interfered…but was NEVER interviewed?

Then (still in the first page of the report) the IG notes the “investigation focused on whether Clinton INTENDED to transmit classified information on unclassified systems, KNEW that information included in unmarked emails was classified, or later BECAME AWARE that information was classified and failed to report it.” (caps emphasis added)

As we’ve already noted (here, as well as in previous blogs) the law regarding felonious mishandling of classified data does not require proof of INTENT…just that it was done.

Why bother reading beyond Page i (the first page)? It’s an exercise in futility.

Unless, of course, you’re an aficionado of FARCE…or a Democrat..

…but, then, we repeat ourselves.


Wait…Hillary was being investigated for private email use by FBI Dir. – who used private email?


Obama’s FBI Director Comey ran the agency charged with the federal investigation into the use of a private email account by Hillary when she served as Secretary of State…

…WHILE both Obama and Comey themselves were using private email accounts.

Which means there was never going to be an indictment of Hillary Clinton for unlawful use of a private account…because they would have had to indict themselves.

Yeah, yeah – nothing to see here folks…move along.

Bizarre Reality – faulting de-nuke talks with No. Korea, but praising ‘ok-to-nuke-up’ Iran deal?

Has the Left-wing media lost all sense of perspective?

Based on their rabid attacks against Pres Trump’s talks with No. Korea’s leader to find a way to get that rogue regime denuclearized, it would appear the short answer Is…


Only in an alternate universe is it a good thing to give leading-terror-sponsor Iran nuclear capabilities, and fault any effort to denuclearize a rogue North Korea.

But that’s where the FakeNews media live now…and they’re okay with it.