Rush Limbaugh posits the question often over the months since Mueller spewed a 448-page hit piece errrr…report…into the public maelstrom swirling around Pres Trump.

There’s a very clear answer to the question ‘why a DoJ probe, if a sitting President can’t be charged with a crime’…Congress doesn’t have the investigative powers DoJ has.

Once Sessions was suckered into recusing, deep-state DoJ powers chose to appoint a special counsel, providing Executive branch agencies for the investigative clownshow.

The fix was in…the game was rigged…with Robert Mueller as circus ringmaster.

But, O-M-G…despite all their (rigged) efforts, they couldn’t find any proof! 

What was left, but to use non-resolution, full of sly innuendo and false narratives.

Mueller clearly was tasked by Democrats to keep impeach-fires burning by issuing a non-resolution rather than do his job, implying Trump’s guilt ‘cuz there’s no proof of innocence…which turns innocent-til-proven-guilty legal standards upside down.

We say clearly, because his job was to investigate if there was any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia…after two years, no evidence supports that claim.

It would’ve taken 5 words to report that result: no proof, no charge recommended.

But Mueller took about 200 pages, laced with innuendo, ending with ‘can’t say he’s innocent’. As a prosecutor IT WASN’T HIS JOB to proclaim innocence. So, the 200 pages of ‘here’s what they said was done, we can’t prove it wasn’t done’ smear.

Then he follows up with 240-some pages on ‘obstruction’ ending with similar innuendo and the implication that, since he can’t be indicted, no final resolution was possible.

Any bright objective first-year journalist could’ve asked why Mueller didn’t recommend a charge…since the actual decision to indict wasn’t the special counsel’s responsibility.

But we digress…everyone knows why Mueller’s done what he’s done.

As noted, the reason a DoJ investigation was launched is simple: because Congress wouldn’t have the more powerful investigative agencies available that the DoJ has.

When you think of it, what’s remarkable is how clean this President and his campaign was, withstanding the investigation of the FBI-CIA-NSA without any relevant charges.

Without even any (dare we say it?) trumped-up charges.

Incredible. And largely, gone unremarked by the media.

One headline says it all: “Netflix Continues Production In Egypt, Where Abortion Is Illegal, While Considering Georgia Boycott Over ‘Heartbeat’ Bill”

Or…two? “HYPOCRITES! Disney Threatens To Cut Off Georgia Film Production Over Pro-Life Laws But Has MASSIVE Business With Communist China”

Now that Mueller’s finally spoken, it’s time to realize he EXONERATED the President.

Because he WOULDN’T exonerate the President.

Confused? Don’t be – this is all part of the Potomac Two-Step: high theater for the deep state, in-the-weeds head bobbing for pundits…but time-wasting for ordinary Americans.

The special counsel was tasked to investigate for ‘collusion’; to recommend charges if any prosecutable offenses were committed. PERIOD. (This is crucial to exoneration.)

NO RECOMMENDED CHARGES WERE MADE. H-E-L-L-O!?!

Forget whether a sitting President can be indicted. For the purposes of this discussion it makes no difference at all – none…because a special counsel DOESN’T INDICT.

Andrew McCarthy noted this in a May 8th article at National Review:

“If there is sufficient evidence, then it is the prosecutor’s job to recommend indictment. The question of whether the OLC guidance should then be invoked to delay indictment should then be up to the attorney general.” (bold, underline emphasis added)

Lost in the latest Mueller head-fakery (deliberately so) is the fact that a recommendation doesn’t equal an indictment. Let this sink in: Mueller could’ve recommended charges to the Justice Department if there were any legitimate reason to do so…without prejudice.

(It’s obvious he would’ve, if he could’ve. Swamp creatures defend the Swamp; any honest person acknowledges his assembled team was partisan Democrat to the hilt.)

Therein lies the PROOF that Trump was innocent. Mueller could’ve, but didn’t. Why?

Mueller’s problem – from the beginning – was being under tremendous pressure to find ANY chargeable offense, where there was none. Had he attempted to recommend that charges be made absent credible evidence, he would have been laughed out of town.

(Not to mention, probably disbarred for malpractice.)

His only alternative, then, was to create a false narrative based on innuendo, that would smear the President, arm Trump’s detractors, and quietly make his exit, stage Left.

Mueller’s false narrative? He didn’t indict because a sitting President can’t be indicted.

Total B.S. The special counsel doesn’t indict…he recommends.

And he couldn’t recommend.

BOOM.

By this time, Mueller has to be wondering how many more times he has to come out of the woodpile and skunk-spray President Trump before Democrats get the message.

His original 440-+ page report was supposed to be the hit-job that got it done, got the impeachment process started…but those cantankerous Democrats waffled instead.

So, yet again, Robert Mueller has to emerge from the woodpile, doing his best ‘incite by implication’ schtick, in a renewed effort to give the waffling Democrats what they want.

But, funny thing – reading the transcript of his comments, it reads more like an ‘I refuse to testify and incriminate myself’ than an indict-by-implication assault against Trump.

No matter how he fancies it up, there’s no evidence against the President or aides that collusion with foreign nationals occurred…he just doesn’t want to say so in those terms.

How else can one define “…if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so” phrasing? Confidence? What kind of cheap-shot phrasing is that? His job is to report on evidence found, not confidence felt.

Here’s an ‘i’ word he refuses to verbalize: I-N-N-O-C-E-N-T

Of course, Mueller’s intent here was to (once more) give media the implication-gasoline to throw on impeachment fires…in yet another attempt to rid the Swamp of its enemy.

If Mueller’s lucky, everyone will be so focused on that they’ll overlook that he failed to follow crucial elements of his instructions, which he’d have to answer for otherwise.

You know, the part where he was instructed to “…conduct the investigation including any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation…” (our emphasis)

I.e., matters like…

• Democrats funded the dirt-dossier that was used to start the investigation;
• Democrats colluded to use foreign agent disinformation for election-meddling;
• Democrats funded the only outfit that analyzed their ‘hacked’ servers;
• Democrats refused to allow the FBI access to those servers;
• Democrats hid the fact they financed the efforts.

Today, Mueller said “The matters we investigated were of paramount importance.” 

Yeah, sure…

…just not important enough to investigate thoroughly…as evidenced by the lack of critical analysis of the dossier, or the Democrat obscured involvement in the CREATION of that dossier: a dossier used as the ENTIRE REASON for a ‘collusion’ investigation.

You’re damn right Mueller won’t testify…he’s crawling back in the woodpile.

Mueller makes a statement this morning, saying he’s got ‘nothing to add’…

…the ‘report speaks for itself’…

…then spews ‘wink, wink’ innuendo obstruction bile, contradicts what AG Barr says Mueller told him (re, why no obstruction determination)…to keep hysteria alive.

Finally, with his ‘can’t indict a President’ comment, Mueller gave media ammo to smear upcoming AG Barr investigations, implying Barr was a liar (without calling Barr a liar).

What a skunk.

And Mueller knows he’s exposed as a partisan: that’s why he couldn’t wait to state that, if he did testify before Congress, it wouldn’t go beyond what’s already in his report…

…’cuz then he’d have to answer uncomfortable questions concerning why he never bothered to investigate the predicate behind the probe (the dirt-dossier), or its funders…

…Democrats. 

And, hopefully, some Republican with backbone could’ve asked Mueller if it’s a Special Counsel’s responsibility to smear…without evidence…the target of an investigation.

Seriously – what politician could have stood up under the type of hostile scrutiny Pres Trump has gone through over the last three years? None, Nada, Zip, Zilch, Zero.

Given 8+ years of weaponized federal agencies and a flood of leaks, what fool doesn’t realize ANY bad info on Trump, including IRS data, would’ve been exposed by now?

Given the extent his opposition has shown (daily) they’re willing to go, it would’ve been SCORCHED EARTH before the election, and definitely NUCLEAR after his election.

That said, what ‘cover-up’ innuendo they’re throwing at him now is just that: innuendo, meant to smear, delegitimize…and a desperate attempt to create doubt before 2020.

Reportedly, Obama’s IRS-FBI-CIA-DoJ-STATE agencies were illegally sifting NSA data on Americans, including Pres. Trump, since 2011. The NSA Dir. blew that whistle.

So, seriously: if there was any ‘dirt’ on Trump, it would’ve been out there long ago. The really incredible story here is how it’s gone unremarked how CLEAN his history is.

That’s a REAL cover-up.

A dishonest media is doing its best to hide all these truths…

…displaying for all to see why they truly are the ENEMY of the people.

Caterwauling and gnashing teeth, they wail over declassified documents, but comparing collusion-hoax deepstaters, scurrying to the shadows, to cockroaches does injustice…

…to the cockroaches.

Declassification will endanger national security? Yeah…THEIR security.

Kick the rats’ nest apart…

…FASTER – PLEASE.

Not sure what’s worse, the ‘just kidding’ Democrat dismissal of their collusion coup effort…or the ‘yah, no biggee’ establishment Republican version.

It wouldn’t have been a joke, it would’ve been a BIG DEAL, if they had succeeded in hounding an innocent man from elected office.

And how many qualified, effective people have been discouraged from serving now, or in the future, because they fear similar attacks?

It WAS treasonous…and it’s effect will be felt for decades.

Ramesh Ponnurru may have a problem with that label because of its potential death-penalty consequences, but fails to consider the long-term reverberations of that deepstate effort.

Cheating the American electorate out of their favored, fairly elected candidate would’ve been huge…and VILE.

Driving a stake through the heart of public confidence in our election process is despicable and it’s time we fought back…

…even if that means invoking TREASON.

They knew the consequences of their actions, but did it anyway, because for too long they’ve seen a lack of will to effect Rule-of-Law at the highest politically-elite levels.

We cannot afford to dismiss such wrongdoing any longer.

But don’t worry Ramesh – the same Americans who could stomach Hillary’s lawlessness will certainly not want Comey or Brennan to pay an ultimate price…

…but it should at least be a long-term jumpsuit orange sentence…

…in our humble opinion.

At HOTAiR.com: “Schiff: Declassifying Crossfire Hurricane data is ‘un-American'”

Since when is TRANSPARENCY un-American, Congressman Schiff?

Rumor has it the congressman is nervous because of various and sundry leaking that was going on (from – horrors – Congressional halls, no less)…could that be it?

As the White House statement notes, such “…action will help ensure that all Americans learn the truth about the events that occurred, and the actions that were taken, during the last Presidential election and will restore confidence in our public institutions.”

Truth, and restored confidence in public institutions…

…aren’t those good things to want, Mr. Schiff? How is that un-American, Mr. Schiff?

BlueCollar can’t wait for those documents to be made public…

…at the risk of sounding, well, you know…un-American.

Don’t see many talking about it, but the revelations that the Democrats’ dirt-dossier was Russian disinformation aimed at attacking Trump means they wanted Hillary to win.

Funny…how the media is so quiet about that…