The ‘blame-Trump-for-Russia-hack-of-DNC’ increased after DNC head resigned

After a ‘hack’ of the DNC IT system in July 2016, Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned.

Now, thanks to conservative news outlets, we’re hearing an evolving story of how their IT gurus, a Pakistani family group, is being investigated for a wide range of illegalities.

But has anyone noticed the intensity of ‘blame-Trump’ hysteria about the same time?

Typical. Democrats fail, then divert attention by falsely accusing Republicans. An age-old strategy, tried-&-true, with a Liberal media willing to push the limits on fake news.

BlueCollar believes the truth will out – aides within the DNC were hacking, not Russia.

And there’s a huge likelihood a large amount of Democrat congressmen were being blackmailed during this period, explaining why these Pakistanis were employed.

We have to believe even now the Sham media is fabricating Trump-Pakistani ties, to offset the truth that Democrats were responsible for their own November demise.

If Mueller has a shred of integrity left, this Pakistani-linked fiasco will be added to his wide-ranging investigation, and (we believe) eventually identified as the real hackers.

(We also suspect the Pakistani cabal has a connection to the murder of Seth Rich.)

Why would Liberal media stop lying, if Republicans so willingly buy their lies?

An IBD article points out the hypocrisy of the Sham-stream media driving the narrative that Obamacare is fine…right up to the point Republicans cave on their healthcare fix.

As soon as they caved, media started pushing their ‘o-m-g, we gotta fix O’care’ line.

So, Obamacare was okay…until it wasn’t? Obviously, they just don’t want the GOP fix.

And fools like McCain and Murkowski fall for it…every time.

Tweet-threats aren’t necessary…just end illegal Obamacare bailouts

President Trump should stop tweeting threats of stopping the insurance company and Congress bailouts, and just do it…they’re unconstitutional, and must be stopped now.

Acting like he might leave them in place improperly implies legitimacy they don’t have.

This isn’t some game of ‘takeaway’ – by law, those bailouts should have never existed.

Imagine the chaos if 30 House Democrats earn impeachment wrath

The arrest of an IT aide to over 30 House Democrats has brought into sharp focus the fact the aide and his family members possibly blackmailed congressional employers.

They were being paid over 3x the going rate, and Imran Awan was retained long past when any other staffer would have been unceremoniously dismissed…and shunned.

It’s reported the Pakistani clan had access to their congressional employers’ email, and the classified information that would have been communicated in their daily routine.

DNC chair Wasserman-Schultz’s aide had her passwords, meaning complete access, and her actions during the last several months have been, shall we say, unusual.

If House Democrats jeopardized national security through being blackmailed, calls for their impeachment would not be considered an unfair concept to pay for such a failure.

Unlike unsubstantiated calls for Trump’s impeachment, where no cause exists…

…if reports of impropriety are correct, their impeachment would be provably deserved.

How long can the Sham-stream media keep this scandal quiet?

(We’re just supremely thankful the investigation isn’t spearheaded by James Comey.)

Why report a REAL scandal when bashing Trump is so much fun?

Peruse the Liberal online news sites, and you wouldn’t know Democrats have the only real security breach scandal going on at the present time, within the halls of Congress.

Wasserman-Schultz and 20-30 other Democrat congressmen employed a family of Pakistanis that were paid 3x-4x the average payscale, while running ripoffs galore.

No one’s explained how they gained such jobs…or access to classified data. 

Rumor has it widespread blackmail of congressmen ensured those high-paying jobs.

But maybe it’s not a media coverup; maybe it’s seen as Democrat business as usual…

…and therefore, not considered ‘news’.

Politicians won’t take down O’care until Trump takes down big-$$ donor insurers

Money drives politics. Politicians thrive on big-money donations that pay for advertising and messaging, which gets them name recognition…and the votes to get them in office.

Obamacare provides tens of billions of dollars to insurance companies, in subsidies and forced ‘participation’ in buying plans, driving up premiums and out-of-pocket costs.

No politician – taking cash and in-kind donation$ from insurance companies – will vote to kill a CASH-COW system that guarantees insurance companies their big bucks.

Because, by doing so, politicians would lose the huge cash infusion from those donors.

The solution? An executive pen…

By executive action, President Trump can stop the money flowing to insurers, and kill the mandate that forces purchasing, which turns off the cash spigot they’ve enjoyed.

Making Obamacare toxic to insurers eliminates the fear politicians have to repeal it.

AG Sessions should appoint a parallel team to keep Mueller’s team honest

The old saying goes that, if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.

Non-partisan qualifications don’t seem to be a high priority for special counsel Mueller, so joining the team is out…but the DoJ can do the next best thing – monitor them.

Jeff Sessions should appoint a parallel team to keep Mueller and his Democrat cohort honest during this process…because there’s no law against setting up a mirror probe.

Special counsel Mueller’s a good friend to the fired Comey, and he’s surrounded himself with Democrat-allied lawyers, which does ZERO to allay conflict-of-interest implications.

The existing counter-intel probe is looking at potential ‘Russian’ interference, but a new counter-intelligence investigation searching for DNC aide collusion sure is justified.

Set it up immediately, and task Mueller’s team with coordinating efforts…and please, try to keep the new team a little more ‘non-partisan’…i.e….no Democrat-leaning lawyers.

(And, we recommend it be done BEFORE just-seized DNC hard-drives get inspected.)

With Mueller’s Clintonistas inspecting DNC hard-drives, what could go wrong?

The FIX is in.

Those who wonder aloud why special counsel Mueller surrounded himself with a cadre of Democrat allies can stop wondering – who better to obscure DNC malfeasance?

Here’s the Washington Times headline that will clear it up “With Mueller investigation, FBI gets chance to physically inspect ‘hacked’ DNC computers”

The only question that remains?

Will ‘the FBI’ do the physical inspection…

…or special counsel Mueller’s Democrat sympathizers…errr…team members?

We’ve maintained from the beginning that the DNC emails were leaked from the inside, and the ‘hacking’ and Russia-collusion talk was a cover-up to smear a GOP president.

Democrats have been positioned along the way, deep-state and otherwise, to preserve a cover-up…unless the FBI is careful, DNC hard-drives will go down the memory hole.

It’s BEYOND time that Mueller be given strict parameters on how he proceeds.

Prosecuting Hillary doesn’t ‘criminalize politics’…SHE criminalized politics

Those condemning the prosecution of lawbreakers because they happen to be political opponents at a certain point in time miss the point…THEY’RE LAWBREAKERS!

Dr. Krauthammer swoons over the idea of Trump ‘criminalizing politics’ by re-opening Hillary’s investigation, ignoring that, by her felonious acts, she did that already.

With all due respect, Dr. Krauthammer…Hillary broke the law YEARS BEFORE Donald Trump became a political opponent, AND while in public office as secretary of state.

Bit even then, who cares when it happens?

What logic gives license to political opponents to act unlawfully? 

Where Rule of Law is respected, ‘who’ one is when they break the law shouldn’t lessen the offense. In fact, an abuse of trust by elected officials should carry extra penalties.

Did Hillary Clinton violate federal law by setting up a personal server for official use?

YES

Did Hillary Clinton mishandle classified information as a result?

YES

Did Hillary Clinton violate federal law by deleting potentially official documents?

YES

Did Hillary Clinton jeopardize national security by her actions?

YES

Would any other private citizen be prosecuted for such activities?

YES

Does it make sense to give lawbreakers a pass because they ran for political office?

NO