There are 2 primary factors in the American election process…

1. Votes are cast;
2. Votes are counted.

To date, no one’s described how either one of those factors can be tampered with in a remote fashion outside the USA, by ‘hackers’ or any other type of foreign agents.

(If we’re talking about domestic tampering, Democrats can fill you in on their tactics.)

But, whether foreign or domestic, the only way an election process can be tampered with is by sabotaging 1) the casting of votes, or 2) the counting of cast votes.

It’s been roughly two years since the election-tampering question by foreign agents has been raised, and almost as long that federal probes have dug into possibilities. The fact premier law enforcement agencies haven’t found evidence on Trump speaks volumes.

But, please, by all means let the Mueller probe go on, because it’s been a fountainhead of damning information on the depths of depravity Democrats will seek to win elections.

We demand Rosenstein order Mueller to follow the guidelines he set forth…to ensure a “full and thorough investigation” and include “any matters” that arise from it, discovery that Hillary and Democrats funded a Russian-sourced dossier must be included…

…that is – if we’re willing to follow where the REAL evidence of tampering leads.

In our lifetime, would ANYONE have believed somebody could survive the relentless onslaught of attacks conducted by a Clinton-Media-Leftwing cabal against opponents?

The one HUGE takeaway from all these (largely) ineffective attacks on Trump…

…either he’s a more wily and capable political animal than those attacking him (in which case he’s clearly the better person to now be sitting in the White House Oval Office)…

…or he’s innocent of anything and everything he’s being attacked for (in which case he’s clearly the better person to now be sitting in the White House Oval Office).

Either way – he’s clearly the better person to now be in the White House.

We’re told Obama’s FBI opened a Trump-campaign investigation after getting news that a low-level campaign aide drunkenly mentioned Russia possibly having dirt on Hillary.

How exactly does that rise to the level of an FBI-worthy investigation?

If political party dirt-digging qualifies, the FBI would have no time for real crime.

That being said, why is there no outcry over the Nation’s law enforcement agency heavyweight partisan appointees weaponizing the FBI against opposition campaigns?

As noted in a salient article at the American Greatness blog

“When the FBI presented the so-called Steele dossier to the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2016, there is no evidence that it was accompanied by a good faith evaluation or summary of its contents.” 

“Why does that matter? It goes to the question of whether Justice Department officials tried to pass off raw intelligence in support of a political agenda as the pretext for a bona fide national security investigation.”

“The FBI’s use of the Steele dossier fails every test for the proper handling of intelligence or evidence.” (emphasis added)

People – getting opposition research (even from foreign sources) isn’t a crime. Passing off dirt-digging opposition research as legitimate context for an investigation might be.

But if getting foreign opposition research was criminal, at this point…

…the only provable evidence of that type collusion is against Democrats.

Face it, folks, the only reason they did it was to torpedo the Trump campaign.

And the only chance they have of getting away with it is if they keep banging drums.

Democrats and GOP never-Trump’ers claim the House memo, which outlines abuses of the FISA system, has no substance – but that claim is only valid if 1 factor is ignored…

…a July FISA application was denied BEFORE the dossier was included, and only was approved in October AFTER the dossier with it’s unsubstantiated info was added.

And, there’s this…

Then-Deputy FBI Directory McCabe testified the dossier was critical to the warrant ok.

Under oath.

Democrats are claiming the closed-door testimony is being taken out of context, but the House Intel chairman, Nunes, says he’ll release McCabe’s testimony if necessary.

Bottom line…

…anyone making the claim FISA abuses are overblown, even though the approved warrant application included unfounded hearsay to get it ok’d, have an uphill climb.

Even with duplicitous FakeNews media giving them a helpful assist, a tough climb.

An Investor Business Daily poll gives Democrats an ominous sign of what lies ahead:

“Some 55% of those said it was “likely” that the Obama administration “improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.” There was an obvious partisan split among the responses, with 87% of Republicans and 55% of independents saying the improper spying took place, but only 31% of Democrats.” (emphasis added)

31% of Democrats saying it’s likely the Obama administration improperly surveilled an opposition political campaign has HUGE implications for mid-terms this November.

And should be troubling for those trying to whistle past the FISA-abuse memo now.

Now, it can only be even more troubling that it appears the dirty-dossier was not just a laundry-list of Russian hearsay, but can be sourced back to Hillary’s campaign.

KARMA: Looks like – for Democrats – the hits just keep on coming.

Obama expanded abilities to surveille citizens before leaving office, with an executive order just days before his exit, which widened that capacity for 17 gov’t agencies.

Republicans claimed the act was done to make it easier to unmask those surveilled and (of course) Democrats scoffed at this charge, dismissing it as just partisan chatter.

Anyone with a reasoning faculty understands, if the Democrat position is correct, then the only way forward is to believe that Obama wanted Trump to have greater powers to monitor and expose the opposition Party…which on the face of it is a ludicrous premise.

But, if that’s the way Democrats want the game played, why not double down?

President Trump has more than enough evidence that PROVES the Democrat Party in general, and the Hillary Clinton campaign in specific, colluded with Russians to develop their opposition smear effort with the dirt-dossier they paid for through FusionGPS.

Game on:

Let’s push for expanded surveillance of suspected colluders ‘cuz, after all…Obama set up the surveillance expansion, so…it must be okay and critical for America…

…otherwise, Obama wouldn’t have let 11 months go by after developing a wider plan of NSA info-dissemination, or waited until just 8 days before leaving office to do so…

…and even Democrats demand that Russia-colluders MUST be exposed, right?

Right?

Begs the question, no?

Those trying so desperately to undermine the House memo that reveals FISA surveille warrant abuse could very well be considered ‘obstructing’ the investigation that began as a result of largely being created, and BASED on those very FISA abuses.

Mr. Mueller, what say you?

Disgraced FBI Dir Comey couldn’t wait to try dissing the House memo exposing abuse of the FISA surveillance process by the Obama administration, but he can’t hide this…

“James Comey Signed FISA Applications Utilizing Same Dossier He Publically Called ‘Salacious and Unverified’ ” (underline emphasis added)

Unnhhh, Jimmy…you may want to talk to that lawyer buddy of yours…

…’cuz if it was salcious and unverified during your June 2017 testimony…

…it sure as HELL was in Oct 2016 – when you signed the FISA app!!!

And if rumors are true, there’s gonna be more surveillance abuses exposed soon.

(Hint)

“Evidence Suggests Obama Admin Spied on Candidate Trump and Campaign LONG BEFORE FISA Request was Presented to FISA Court” (emphasis added)

You just got a once-in-a-lifetime promotion.

Life is good; you’ve got some great ideas that will move your company forward, while hugely improving the lives of all its employees with better wages and more benefits.

But just as you’ve turned on the lights in your new office, you learn your promotion is in jeopardy because a co-worker up for the same job has paid to have an ‘independent’ source write a dossier alleging (falsely) that you had conspired with a competitor.

Now your boss is telling you things are ‘on hold’ until everything gets straightened out, and in the meantime, not only are you neutralized, you might actually be fired.

Unfair? You bet.

Just ask President Trump.

According to the House memo just released, the opposition research doc that formed the basis to justify a FISA surveille warrant on Trump cost Democrats just $160k.

Isn’t it incredible how much Democrat anarchy just $160k can cause…

…when you have the full force and effect of a FakeNews media to push the chaos?

“House memo states disputed dossier was key to FBI’s FISA warrant to surveil members of Team Trump”

The memo charges

• a Democrat-funded opposition doc was an essential part of the FISA application;
• relevant information on the target (Carter Page) was excluded from the app;
• neither the original application or its 3 renewals disclose the Democrats’ role in the funding and creation of the opposition doc forming the basis for the application;
• the creator of the doc (Steele) was verifiably unreliable and not credible as an FBI source, but was not noted as such in the application;
• after the FBI fired Steele, they renewed the Steele-based FISA app 3 times;
• DOJ and FBI signatories and primary actors were notably, provably anti-Trump but not disclosed as potentially biased anywhere in the application;
• even though used as a basis for the application, the dirt-dossier was in its infancy as to corroboration (and unsubstantiated as of today!) but that went undisclosed;
• the application “…ignored or concealed (Steele’s) anti-Trump financial, ideological motivations…”
• “Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI…Deputy Dir Andrew McCabe signed one. Then-DAG Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more of the FISA apps on behalf of DOJ.”

Bottom line? “FBI Officials Knew Political Origins of Dossier, But Used It Anyway“

Well, if nothing else, we now know who the unknown FBI and DOJ people are who warned against releasing the House memo due to ‘national security’ concerns.

Message to Comey, McCabe, Yates, Boente, Rosenstein: you better lawyer up.

Message to President Trump – fire Rosenstein for cause; replace Mueller with someone who will actively pursue the real criminal and fraudulent acts behind this farce.

Finally, to Democrats who decry a GOP loose-lip policy pertaining to classified data…

…considering your role in the Awan Pakistani aide IT scandal, you have no credibility.