Open borders…the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats.

We know that immigrants typically vote Democrat when they first get into America. The Hispanic demographics tell us they embrace bigger government and social safetynets.

Which is why Democrats demand illegal immigrants get amnesty…to become voters.

For Democrats, the challenge is to get illegal immigrants into ‘GOP-stronghold’  states (ie, California, a reliably ‘blue state’ doesn’t need more immigrants to remain Democrat).

Then, it turns the demographics against Republicans in those key states.

So, it looks like Obama has chosen the ‘busing’ solution for strategic distribution.

Illegal immigrants caught entering Texas are being sent by the feds to holding facilities in Arizona…you can bet other reliably Republican states are seeing the same influx.

Then as holding systems overload, either courts will be inundated with ‘humanitarian crisis’ suits demanding their release, or Obama will do it illegally…and very publicly.

(A typical Democrat ‘heart-string tugger’…great for get-out-the-vote election years.)

Heart-strings. Believe this…it’s no accident those being sent to Arizona are kids.

The administration says the ‘Arizona solution’ is due to strained conditions in Texas, but we can’t help but wonder…and marvel…at the media’s failure to ask one question…

…if they crossed into Texas illegally, why not send them to Mexico’s holding centers?

(After all, even for those considered to be geographically challenged, a quick check of world maps, or Google, confirms…Mexico’s the only country bordering Texas.)

Wouldn’t busing kids back to their homeland be the most humanitarian thing to do?

What’s more ‘humanitarian’ for those kids…busing them 1100+ miles to Arizona…

…and further from their homeland and parents…

…or 5 miles back to their homeland – in Mexico?

Obama is throwing a lot of wood on the election fire, much of it threatening Democrats.

Would it be too cynical to suggest a set-up?

Democrats, especially in the Senate, are running scared. They want distance; many of them are already trying to position themselves as mavericks (as if it mattered, but, hey).

Wouldn’t it be just like Obama to talk tough on coal and climate change in general, then cave to…Democrats, who ‘stand tough against Obama, and tall for (fill in the state)’?

Then in Nov elections, Joe Electorate once again votes for the ‘tough guy who stood up to Obama’, who then runs back to Washington DC to (you guessed it) toe the Party line.

(The visual? At home with constituents – a WOLF. On Capitol Hill n D.C. – a SHEEP)

Why else would Obama take Democrat-alienating stances 5 months before elections?

Just askin…

Word is, after deserting his post Bergdahl left a note renouncing his U.S. citizenship.

If true, Obama just turned loose 5 Taliban killers…in exchange for 1 Taliban traitor?

Which, when it comes right down to it, sorta describes Obama’s foreign policy to a ‘t’.

Somewhere in Moscow, Putin is laughing his ass off.

Talk about incompetent.

More negative stories are coming out about Bergdahl.

If this exchange was used to get more Taliban in place for eradication, it was worth it. If it was used as an expedient means to drown stories of VA failures, well, so be it.

Either way, it’s a down side for Democrats.

Their leader just released 5 of the most deadly Taliban back onto the world’s streets, and if it wasn’t to kill them (and more), but only to stop the VA-story bleeding…

…Bergdahl’s iffy status and the fact Americans died looking for him doesn’t bode well.

And God forbid anyone else should die at these Taliban hands in the future.

Even a fawning Obama media couldn’t keep that news off the front pages.

Liberal columnist Richard Cohen laments…

“Obama Has Lost His Golden Speechmaking Ability”

BlueCollar suggests he’s lost his credibility (If you like your health plan…, etc).

His speech-making covers the same old ground…he just can’t sell it anymore.

Without credibility, it doesn’t matter how golden-toned his delivery is.

No-Brainer questions on political ‘energy’ choices

Do you want cheap affordable energy, or do you want prices to ‘skyrocket‘?

Understanding that, when energy costs rise, it affects every aspect of our lives.

Happy with food and electricity prices? Do you enjoy paying over twice what you should have to, at the gas pump? Were you all warm and fuzzy over heating costs last winter?

This is what happens when ‘green energy’ is being hyped unnecessarily. Over the last 18 years, the global temps have remained flat or fell…so, why add more EPA regs?

Earth’s not getting warmer, our seas aren’t rising, glaciers are still here, and polar ice isn’t melting…no amount of Obama/Gore-tastic hype can refute these scientific facts.

But, for Democrats, it’s about lining their pockets, while they enrich their fatcat billionaire buddies like Steyer and Soros, who benefit financially from policies of kept politicians.

So, who do you trust…

…those who want to keep energy costs down, making life affordable for all…

…or those who want to drive costs up, enriching a chosen few…

…while making life miserable for the rest of us?

Maybe the more important question is…

…do you support enriching those who make your daily energy costs affordable…

…or do you support enriching those who make your daily energy costs unaffordable?

And, of course, the Nov-election question, for honest Democrats and Independents…

…do they hate Republicans more than they love affordable living?

Let’s face it…when it comes to energy…someone is always getting rich…so…

…would you rather it be at your expense, or your pleasure?

To attack a non-existent global warming trend, Obama announces plans to cut CO2 energy plant emissions by 30% more over the next 16 years…but wait a minute…

…there’s been no global warming for the last 18 years.

We’re past believing he believes in anything. Our guess…?

Follow-The-Money.

His policies have done more to enrich the top 1% he so vilifies, and consequently done more to increase the ‘income inequality’ he so often laments, over the last 5+ years.

So, follow the money. Either he’s buying advance stocks that will always be positively affected by such inanities, or he’s enriching Tom Steyer, Soros, and Buffett…

…who will take care of him after he leaves office. Either way…

…such unethical acts hurt middle-&-low income earners he claims to champion.

Turns out that Obama may have a ‘no deserters left behind’ policy.

Military members in his unit claim Bergdahl walked off his post, before his capture.

If true, we wonder…Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were left to die in Benghazi while manning their posts defending Americans during the overnight attack in 2012…

…would Obama have sent them help…if they had deserted their post instead?

He’ll break the law for an American traitor…but not for American heroes?

Over the weekend, the much-respected Andy McCarthy penned an article for NRO.

He discusses the challenge of finding strong public support for impeachment, since the Senate is currently controlled by Democrats, where an impeachment would be tried.

But BlueCollar has noted previously how to change that dynamic immediately…

…the Senate won’t be Democrat-controlled if they’re included in the impeachment.

The fraud that is Obamacare was perpetrated on Americans with lies from both Obama and Congressional Democrat co-conspirators using ‘you can keep your plan’ rhetoric.

Impeaching Senate Democrats along with Obama on their breach of covenant with the American people in this massive fraud, immediately swings the Senate to the GOP…

…because impeached Senators cannot sit in judgment on their own impeachment!

McCarthy makes a case that, unless public outrage is enough that their support can swing 2/3 of the Senate, Obama’s lawlessness (abetted by Democrats) will continue.

He explains that political abuses of power which violate public trust are impeachable.

He just didn’t do the math…impeaching Democrat co-conspirators in the Senate, along with Obama, swings Senate trial-control to the Republican Senators.

Including the breach of trust on Americans that is Obamacare, as one of the articles of impeachment (and citing Democrat Senators as co-conspirators), defangs Harry Reid and his Democrat Senate cohort, ending need for protracted public support entreaties.

Mr. McCarthy very succinctly lays out an impeachment justification…

…following a BlueCollar lead, the House Republicans have the means…

…but do they have the courage?

5 top Taliban commanders have been released from Gitmo, for an American hostage.

Army Sgt Bergdahl was taken captive June 2009. America will welcome his return.

And BCP will refrain from accusations of lawlessness by Obama, even though, by law, he was required to notify Congress…but refused to do so, without a second thought.

Some in Congress are concerned about the message this sends the Taliban; that it  encourages more hostage-taking attempts against our American military, not just in Afghanistan…but anywhere around the globe where terrorism runs rampant.

That train has left the station. We don’t see how his releasing Taliban adds more fuel to a Hate America fire, considering weaknesses Obama’s already shown.

BCP notes with some curiosity that the administration says security measures are in place to make sure that those exchanged Taliban don’t pose a security threat.

(The ‘measures’ are extremely thin; he’s releasing these Taliban to Qatar security, and they’re under a 1-year travel ban that’s supposed to keep them in Qatar. Fat chance.)

Making deals with murderous terrorists is never a good thing, but maybe now we can be pleased that our ‘Liar-in-Chief’, Barack ‘keep your health plan’ Obama, made the deal.

If Obama can lie to Americans…surely it’s no struggle for him to lie to a Talibani?

(Many Americans probably never thought they’d be thankful to have a liar as president! But hey, if Obama can lie to pass a health plan, why not lie to save Sgt. Bergdahl? And, besides, who among us thinks he would easily lie to America…but not to the Taliban?)

BlueCollar prays that means as they get off the plane and are welcomed by comrades,  the Taliban 5 will also be met by our signature American Welcome Wagon …

…a.k.a., the drone MQ-1 Predator.

Welcome home, Sgt. Bergdahl…

…we only wish Obama had shown the same executive machismo in Benghazi…

…then Doherty, Woods, Stevens, and Smith could have welcomed you home as well.