The Supreme Court ruled Obamacare can’t force businesses to violate religious belief.

Several business owners objected to being forced to provide free contraception, which violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act…SCOTUS agreed, on a 5-4 ruling.

Guess Sandra Fluke should forget about working at Hobby Lobby.

Of course, Liberals don’t agree, including Justice Ginsburg…because, you see…

…only a Liberal should decide WHICH religious beliefs are protected by law.

(Is it cruel to wish THEIR parents had chosen the birth control route?)

(Just wonderin’)

Seems fair to ask Democrats to lead the way on this.

If they want open borders, let them be the first to open their homes to refugees.

Roughly 33% of the electorate register as Democrats…that’s a lot of homes.

It’s only fair to ask those who support open borders to be first to lead the way.

Another day, another global warming ‘scientist’ warning the ‘CO2 balance is tipped’.

Before the Industrial Revolution began in the late 17th Century, atmospheric CO2 levels were 280 parts per million…today it measures 400 parts per million…

OMG…cue Chicken Little! Filthy modern man is destroying the Earth!

But, before you send your donation to Al Gore, you might consider this…

…during the Carboniferous Period 300-360 million years ago, measurements of rock layers revealed CO2 levels were as high as 8000 parts per million!

And, oh, did we mention…that period lasted 60 million years, nonetheless?

We understand the sea floors were rich with brachiopods and surface life was rich with diapsids (eventually, reptiles)…no doubt the filthy scum responsible for so much CO2.

Yet the world we know evolved, though CO2 levels were often 20x greater than today.

(So, human polluters, it’s okay to exhale…you did know that was CO2 you emit, right?)

Makes you wonder what the EPA and Al Gore think they’re protecting us from now…

…brachiopods?

(Just think…if the EPA and Al Gore had been there then, we might not be here now.)

Shouldn’t it humble Al Gore and enviro-whackos to know, when it comes to CO2…

…brachiopods outproduced humans?

But Al doesn’t care…for him it isn’t about climate…it’s about portfolio investments.

News reports indicate Obama wants $2 billion to deal with the border crisis.

He should send that bill to Mexico. If they can’t pay it, take it from their foreign aid.

(We give that government over $750 million a year in foreign aid.)

Mexico let the illegals through; it’s that nation’s border they’re crossing. It’s patently ludicrous to absorb billions in costs because Mexico won’t control its border…

…while we send them $760 million a year in foreign aid.

If Democrats feel that’s way harsh, let them fund it from their campaign funds…

…after all, they’re the ones who feel so strongly about open borders.

Besides, it gives them a chance to put their money where their mouth is….

…and…pay for the chaos THEY created.

Fining a government agency for violating personal freedoms doesn’t solve the problem.

Your tax dollars pay fines levied against government agencies, but agency wrongdoers must be punished as well, otherwise there’s no incentive for stopping bad behavior.

Think about it…if it’s tax dollars paying the fine, we taxpayers foot the bill. Besides, if government won’t hold its malefactors accountable, bad deeds will continue.

The present-day IRS scandal is a good example. For several years, its legion has been using obstruction and intimidation tactics to attack or stonewall conservative groups.

A traditional-marriage-defense group was just awarded a $50k settlement from the IRS. An IRS worker unlawfully gave confidential information to a gay marriage group, which used the donor list to harass and intimidate private traditional-marriage supporters.

But merely fining a government agency doesn’t solve the problem, since it’s our tax dollars picking up the tab. Government workers in sensitive positions, who violate the public trust, must be punished a-s-a-p, and made to pay back those tax dollars.

So, how does that happen, when agencies involved, including law enforcement, are all run by an administration bent on thwarting the very laws being broken?

Congress. They have the power to freeze bank accounts, and withhold agency funding.

The House of Representatives controls spending. If an agency won’t hold accountable those who break the law, Congress can use financial pressure to force accountability.

Start at the top, freezing all their personal assets and salaries, and give those pressured 72 hours to comply or face commensurate extended financial pain and house arrest.

Some might argue that agency directors may not have been aware of the problem…but failing to hold accountable those responsible makes them part of the problem.

And after all…isn’t that where the buck always stops?

Quit playing games…exert financial pressure. Watch how fast they comply.

Couldn’t resist…sung to the tune of ‘Send in the Clowns’…

…report says George Clooney is thinking of running for California Governor.

Isn’t it rich?

$76 million to put an anti-suicide net under the Golden Gate Bridge. But it begs the question…what will stop someone bent on suicide who simply jumps from that net?

Will they put another net under the first one…?

And so on…and so on…and so on…

Just wondering.

So the Speaker of the House is suing Obama for NOT executing the law…

How stupid is that? If the court finds judgment against Obama, any guesses as to who has to execute the law and enforce the judgment?

The same guy who won’t ‘faithfully execute the law’ now…Obama.

This lawsuit classically defines ‘theater of the absurd’.

Our U.S. Constitution provides the method for reining in out of control gov’t branches.

Maybe Speaker Boehner should read up on it.

BlueCollar’s been blogging this for over a year…how can you work with a lawbreaker?

You can’t deal with this ‘OathBreaker-in-Chief’. By his failure to ‘faithfully execute law’, the congressman has finally articulated what we’ve been saying for over a year now…

…because there’s no guarantee Obama will keep his word and enforce the law.

Even a Democrat should understand that.

During the time from 2000 to 2014, native-born American job holders have declined slightly, but the U.S. has added a net 6 million jobs…obviously, for immigrants.

Numbers don’t lie…but politicians will.