…just look at what they’ve done to the Rule of Law over 8 years!

The Left’s caterwauling increases with a looming Electoral College vote mid-Dec.

They rant about the ‘popular vote’, which appears to have been won by Hillary Clinton, claiming that Trump is illegitimate since he didn’t get the majority of votes.

But, set aside the fact illegal immigration and sanctuary locales are a breeding ground for voter fraud; forget the fact that dead people have cast votes in the past.

Every state IS decided by popular vote, and Trump won a clear majority of those states…as an ‘invisible entity’, states need representation just as much as citizens.

Legislation favoring highly populated states could hurt lesser populated states…

…a ‘tyranny of the minority’ (of states) would be an inevitable result.

National elections can only have national consequences if every state is given an opportunity for skin in the game; the brilliance of the electoral process does that.

The Founders recognized each state as an entity that needed protection just as much as citizens did…the electoral process is a mechanism that makes it happen.

And, take note – corporations are given ‘special entity status’ in law.

You can bet the Sham-stream media would scream bloody murder if their corporate protections were removed…

…yet they fuel the ‘popular-vote’ rant that would strip states of protection?

The irony drips…

Even Liberal leaders aren’t THAT stupid…evidently the Pennsylvania recount deadline was Nov 21st, which means they missed by 7 days.

But they have been sending out fund-raising requests bolstered by a recount stance, so it appears their recount ploy was just to dupe the masses into sending them money.

With Michigan favoring Trump, his electoral total is now 306. It takes 270 to win.

So, the Left fever-swamp screams for recounts in Michigan (16 electoral votes), Wisconsin (10 electoral votes), and Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes).

Even if recounts could negate 11,000 Michigan votes, or 27,000 Wisconsin votes (both highly unlikely), Trump would still win with 280 electoral votes.

In the Left’s recount madness, Pennsylvania (with 20 electoral votes) is key…but Trump won that state by 68,200 votes. 68,200 votes, people.

No way a recount negates 68,200 votes: Trump still has 280…Trump wins…

So, what’s the point?

Many doubt a recount can be done before the electoral vote…Trump wins…

So, what’s the point?

If a recount isn’t done in time, a Congress GOP chooses…Trump wins…

So, what’s the point?

Smearing Trump as illegitimate seems the only thing the Left gains with such tactics.

What’s a Republican to do? USE DEMOCRAT TACTICS AGAINST THEM!

Trump can negate their effort, by demanding a recount of Minnesota (lost by 43.8k votes), Maine (lost by 20k votes), and New Hampshire (lost by 2.8k votes)…

…thus, Hillary’s electoral count is illegitimate.

Even if Democrats maintain such recounts aren’t feasible because those totals have been certified, Trump can dismiss their claims using another Democrat tactic…

… where they claim ‘seriousness of the charge offsets the nature of the evidence.’

Lest we forget, when it comes to acting, even in political theater…

…Trump is the Maestro.

Let the games begin.

News media report what Trump DIDN’T say, to alienate him from his supporters.

Expect this dishonesty from the media throughout his presidency.

When it comes to deceit, trust the Sham-stream media to be front and center.

An interesting article in The Weekly Standard provides a laundry list of elected office losses for Democrats during Obama’s reign…even as his popularity remains high.

But…does it? How is it Obama’s popular, but Democrats keep losing due to policy?

BCP suggests that the popularity polling is skewed by Obama’s race – continual rants and wails of ‘racism’ by the Left makes those polled less inclined to honesty.

As a result, terrible policy decisions continue, everyone smiles…then votes GOP.

Thanks to their relentless race-card rhetoric, Liberalism is being thwarted.

Irony drips.

Hopefully, a similar dynamic will result if Libs keep up their election-riot nonsense.

As of this post, Clinton’s popular vote total is 62,523,126. Trump’s is 61,201,134.

Screams from the Left about popular-vote-vs-electoral inequities are ridiculous, considering Trump won a majority of states AND the popular vote…

…if you discount California, a HUGE sanctuary state.

It’s a large illegal population, rife with vote fraud potential. Deducting California from the popular vote count, Trump overshadows Clinton by 2 million votes.

The electoral process puts all states in play during national elections, and as such, is a perfect solution for our voting process that affects ALL states with its results.

Even without that argument, no reasonable person would want one state to so heavily skew results, which would be the outcome with a popular-vote system.

As we noted previously, Republican-with-Libertarian votes would have carried 35 of the 50 states with an anti-Democrat policy mandate.

Besides…

…sanctuary-locales should have their votes independently audited before counting.

Whether you’re part of the crazed Left, or a rock-ribbed conservative, getting panties in a bunch over what Trump might or might not do…

….pre-inauguration…

…is an exercise in futility.

Who in their right mind signals intent when the opposition is still in a position of power?

For those arguing Trump should leave Hillary Clinton alone now that he’s been elected, we offer unassailable logic:

If enforcing National Security laws doesn’t justify the objective use of Rule of Law…nothing does.

Setting up a private email server which handled classified National Securiy issues while she was a Secretary of State was illegal.

BCP urges a thorough investigation of ANYONE involved in activities that jeopardize National Security.

And, yes, sorry media, that includes DEMOCRATS.

Trump nominates Jeff Sessions for Att’y Gen’l, a man who helped desegregate schools and successfully prosecuted KKK leaders…

…and Democrats – the party of the KKK and Jim Crow laws – rise out of fever swamps to call HIM a racist?

You would think a Party steeped in racism would be more familiar with its attributes. Desegregating, and prosecuting KKK ilk qualifies?

We don’t think so.