It’s a legitimate question.
Arguably, if a state is providing sanctuary to illegal immigrants it’s a federal offense – a felony, by definition of law. Obviously, a state’s governing body acts unconstitutionally.
(You know – that document they swore as an oath-of-office to support and defend.)
Just askin’…
O-M-G: the Left is ecstatic that Mueller will testify at a House hearing.
Can you say ‘NOTHING-BURGER’?
There’s ONLY ONE QUESTION that needs answering at that hearing…
Mr. Mueller – can you justify an investigation, and establishment of a special counsel, based on unsubstantiated opponent research completely funded by Democrats?
‘Hacking’ claims? A CrowdStrike analysis…funded by Democrats.
‘Collusion’ claims? A dirt-dossier analysis…funded by Democrats.
We repeat, for absolute clarity…
Hack analysis, Trump campaign foreign collusion unsubstantiated by federal agencies.
N.O.T.H.I.N.G.
B.U.R.G.E.R.
But, okay, let’s put the Hearing into overdrive with one more question…
Mr. Mueller, if Russia ‘meddling in the American election process’ was your focus, why wasn’t the provable Democrat collusion included as part of your report?
The ‘mouth that mewled’ Ocasio-Cortez bemoans detention centers as torture facilities, but ignores the fact Democrat rhetoric is luring the illegal immigrants into them.
It must be so comfortable – creating a crisis with bad legislation, expanding the crisis with enticement rhetoric, extending the crisis by refusing to fix the legislation, then…
…blaming Republicans for the crisis DEMOCRATS create, expand, extend, and exploit.
A comfort that only a deceitful, enabling news media provides.
You can’t make this stuff up.
Hollywood continues pushing the Democrat Russia hoax as “Alyssa Milano, Sigourney Weaver Among Actors Starring in Mueller Report Play”
Savor the irony: actors (paid pretenders) playing out a paid pretend Democrat ploy.
And, sadly, they take themselves so seriously.
“Rutgers to Host ‘Dismantling White Organizational Culture’ Event”
Another day, another attack against whites. When did it become necessary to apologize for achievement? And, when did failure of others become the fault of the achievers?
Some of the oldest civilizations identified have been in Africa. As a continent, it has a massive 20% of the world’s total land area, with all the natural resources that entails.
(Got that? The African continent is 3x the land mass of the USA.)
Arguably, it’s head start on civilizations and natural resource abundance could’ve been the impetus to make Africa a world leader, a super-power…yet it remains what it is.
Well, but they were colonized, occupied by European nations, some will argue.
Yeah? Well, America was ruled by England before throwing off the yoke.
At risk of being labeled ‘racist’, it has to be said – Africa’s failure isn’t America’s fault.
‘Dismantling a white organizational culture’? WHY?
How does destroying success solve the problems of other nations’ failures?
Here’s a thought…
…isn’t it more constructive to BUILD a successful non-white organizational culture?
And, maybe it would help if non-whites realized they were a part of America’s success.
Our schools, media, and political landscape should reinforce that understanding, rather than rushing to destroy the model of success they should be taking credit for building.
Incivility, rioting, and violence have become the norm in political discourse.
But it’s only practiced by ONE side. Antifa, BlackLivesMatter, OccupyWallSt all practice violent unrest and chaos in the streets to put their point across…that being HATE.
(And, before anyone invokes Charlottesville, we note that the orchestration of the White Supremacist rally in that city was by Left-wing activists posing as alt-Right extremists.)
That said, while violent, they may make up a small part of the Democrat Party, so is it fair to say moderate, thoughtful Democrats are to be lumped in with the ne’er-do-wells?
Let’s answer this way: moderate? How is justifying killing a new-born ‘moderate’?
Thoughtful? How is allowing faulty immigration legislation that ENCOURAGES abuse of thousands of illegal immigrant children by force-marching them 1000 miles ‘thoughtful’?
Why go any further? Just those two issues expose HUGE moral failures on the Left.
And when Life begins is splitting a hair no Pro-Life advocate condones. Logic dictates: without conception, there is no Life. Logically, Life begins at conception. As for illegal immigrant child abuse…it started when the journey started. Logically, if the child never left their home to make the 1000-mile trek, there wouldn’t be a problem at the border.
NO AMOUNT OF DEBATE CAN ALTER THIS LOGIC.
The Democrat position on abortion and open borders ALONE display the vile nature of the Party at its core: how, then, is it possible to be civil with any of its supporters?
Sure, we could go on: their energy policy drives up costs, hurting low-income’ers and poor the most. Their economic policy causes high unemployment, hurting minorities. Their education policy confines the most vulnerable to failed public school systems. Their open-borders policy drives up joblessness, and drives down wages and benefits.
But why go there, anyway?
Allowing the murder of newborns, and encouraging illegal immigrant child abuse is a powerful indictment of a once-proud political group soon heading for extinction…
…we hope.
Otherwise, killing babies and abusing illegal immigrant kids will continue.
Headlined on the Breitbart News website: “Rosanna Arquette: ‘Every Minute, The United States is Abusing Children at the Border’”
See, they’re not abused during a 1000+ mile forced march…just when they get here.
Dangerous open-border/catch-&-release rhetoric, and faulty immigration law that begs drug/sex traffickers to use children to achieve their vile objectives – is REAL abuse.
Such actions encourage bad behavior…which begets MORE bad behavior.
But they don’t care about that – it doesn’t achieve the Democrat objective…which is to flood the United States with illegal immigrants looking for government largesse…
…and with the potential to become Democrat voters (legally – or illegally).
Yeah, they’re not abused during the arduous journey…just once they get here.
It’s disgusting for politicians to use people in this manner…
…and disgusting that Americans aid and abet the process by voting for these vile users.
Puzzled? Don’t be.
The move to hold off for two weeks on deportation of illegal aliens is just one more play by this President that shows his respect for Congress…and his disgust with Congress.
Announcing deportations was an opening gambit; then delaying the act and putting the responsibility for its necessity squarely in Congress’s lap is…well…just brilliant strategy.
Congress made immigration laws with loopholes; they need to fix that. With deportation on the table, giving Congress two weeks to do their job throws it back where it belongs.
By his act President Trump displays respect for rule-of-law and separation of powers while, at the same time (ONE week before their July 4th break) giving them TWO weeks to solve the problem. Going back to their districts absent a solution is, then, on them.
Fixing the loopholes would take one day if Democrats in Congress wanted a fix. And that’s where the President’s respect for the process comes into play. But Mr. Trump knows his opponents, and – you guessed it – that’s why he has disgust for them.
Pres. Trump knows his opponents do not want to give him a ‘win’,..even if it means the Nation as a whole would benefit from their actions. And the Nation is watching…
…with the burden placed squarely where it belongs – on Congress.
Art-of-the-Deal is alive and well in the White House.
Once again, he’s played Democrats like a Stradivarius.
Some weak-knee Trump supporters may go wobbly over his move to hold off for two weeks on deportations: those who know his strategic long game are nodding heads.
When in doubt, remember…it’s just Trump BEING Trump.
Keep the faith; trust the man…enjoy the show.
For years, we’ve made the case slavery-reparation demands are illogical considering black Americans are among the world’s most well-off black demographic…
…especially compared to all the African nations.
An article at American Thinker makes that same case: “The legal theory behind reparations is that if a person had suffered an economic loss as a result of the action of another person, he would be able to seek a civil remedy. Critical to this process is the measurement of the degree of economic loss the first person experienced.”
That said “If one were to contrast the economic advantage of a life lived by a native of Africa whose ancestors had not been taken in slavery with a black American whose ancestors had been taken in slavery, one might be inclined to conclude that there is no advantage to having remained in Africa. In fact, one can make a case that such actions resulted in a benefit rather than a loss.” (bold, underline emphasis added)
Can anyone claim blacks living in America are worse off than if they still lived in Africa?
Reparation hearings in Congress were barely underway before Democrat crazies spoke of black children poverty percentages as a result driven by slavery issues of long ago.
Comparing percentages of white kids living in poverty vs 3-times as many black kids, without considering the single-parent percentages of each demographic, is a convenient dodge for Democrats…because that wouldn’t fit their reparations narrative, at all.
Truth is, black American single-parent families are almost 3-times the number of whites, percentage-wise. Hmmm…3-times as many black kids live in poverty, AND in single-parent homes. Any reasoning adult knows 2-parent incomes solve poverty issues.
Or, are Democrats blaming black single-family percentages on slavery?
How does that work?