8 western states…WuFlu stats (as of Apr 05)

(8 western states: HI, CA, WA, OR, ID, NV, AZ, UT = 21% U.S. population)

Combined WuFlu data for 8 western states, based on (Apr 05) Worldometer stats:

  • Ttl cases – 29556 (9.0% of ttl US cases reported)
  • Ttl deaths – 794 (8.5% of ttl US deaths reported)

California, with over 5X the population, has had 322 deaths compared to Washington, which has had 314 deaths. (Remaining 6 states accounted for the other 158 deaths.)

Take from this what you will, but data may indicate large-populous states of California and Washington, among these 8 states, may have actually spiked months ago.

If bogus WuFlu data justifies economy shutdown, HONEST data justifies its ramping back up – NOW

At RedState.com:

“Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist, took a serious look at the IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) Coronavirus model and called it ‘garbage’…Davis found that the actual numbers of hospitalizations on April 1 were a fraction of the numbers projected by the IHME model. The problem with the model, he discovered, is that it uses New York and New Jersey data and applies it to the rest of the states.

(New York and New Jersey are reporting hugely disproportionate WuFlu numbers. The IHME model is being used by the states and federal gov’t to set our health guidelines.)

Prediction modeling is only as good as the honesty of data being used; if it relied on heavily skewed states to predict otherwise lightly affected states, it’s clearly bogus.

If unwitting, shame on them for such ignorance. But, if deliberate…and relentlessly skewed climate modeling leads us to believe that’s typical…why fall for it any more?

Add to that the news that New York was reporting any death where Wuhan Flu was present to that flu, even when it didn’t cause the death, and the picture gets muddier.

Then there’s the (?) suspicious lack of reporting on standard seasonal flu data (which might reveal – once the WuFlu’s added in – there’s no dramatic seasonal increase).

Bogus prediction modeling; over-inflated WuFlu death data-reporting; news footage of American hospitals at a breaking point using Italian hospital videos…what’s going on?

We’ve said it before, we’ll say it again…

…if they have to DECEIVE to make their point…THEY HAVE NO POINT.

We’re not sure what’s worse…media’s sky-is-falling WuhanFlu hysteria reporting, or a gullible American public willing to buy this LIE and watch their Nation go down the tube.

Anyone notice the lack of ‘seasonal flu’ reporting during this hysteria?

Can’t help but think that lack of reporting is because it doesn’t help the panic-mongers.

After all, if ‘regular’ seasonal flu cases/deaths are down, it makes this WuFlu just an added – but not panic-worthy – issue that blends with the seasonal flu norms in the U.S.

Now, what about the usual death-from-other-health-causes reporting? Are individual states reporting lower-than-normal rates, which indicates WuFlu unnecessarily blamed?

Where’s the objective media reporting when it’s needed?

Aircraft carrier Captain jeopardized its mission, that’s why he deserved removal

This headline at the Washington Examiner…“Navy draws heavy fire for sacking skipper of coronavirus-infected aircraft carrier”…doesn’t tell the whole story.

That carrier skipper revealed weaknesses in our defenses, jeopardizing the mission.

Sure, he had every right to want his crew protected…but publicly releasing a letter that revealed mission-critical information to our adversaries wasn’t the right way to do it.

PERIOD.

FULL.STOP.

…and now, we’re hearing WuFlu death-counts are being over-inflated?

“New York City is lying about Chinese virus death rates”

In brief, they’re counting deaths from Wuhan flu…even when flu didn’t cause the death.

At the AmericanThinker: “In New York City, the death of anyone who dies who tests positive for COVID-19 is counted as a coronavirus death.  This is the case even if the coronavirus failed to play a significant role in the person’s passing or illness.”

Which begs the question: has all this hype over the Wuhan Flu been a deliberate hoax, meant to dampen an explosive economy and influence the November election…

…or, even worse…

…to further promote the Left’s ‘progressive’ agenda using a Cloward-Piven strategy, which proposes overwhelming the system (creating a crisis) to push gov’t control?

(One way to investigate this possibility is to evaluate overall deaths in New York to see if all other health category death statistics have inexplicably gone down since January. If those numbers were (suddenly) lower, it’s easy to argue they’ve inflated WuFlu deaths.)

Sure, this could be dismissed as ‘conspiracy theory’ reasoning, but think about this…

…given the economy-destroying reaction to date in the U.S., how far-fetched is it to believe adversaries are formulating strategies to exploit similar reactions in the future?

As for Cloward-Piven, a strategy based on 1) controlling Healthcare; 2) increasing Poverty; 3) increasing unsustainable Debt; 4) forcing Gun Control; 5) controlling our daily Welfare; 6) controlling Education; 7) wiping out Religion; 8) exploiting Class Warfare…it’s beyond coincidental that every aspect of that strategy is NOW in play.

Just sayin’…

Media’s gonna need a bigger boat to push this level of deceit…

They mocked WuhanFlu warnings in January; they ranted against President Trump for his China travel ban in January; they spurned risky city-travel warnings in February…

…yet, now, claim the administration didn’t act fast enough, and hasn’t done enough?

When Biden wasn’t defending China, he was lying about Trump’s efforts against the flu.

In the movie ‘Jaws’ a community sheriff (played by Roy Scheider), upon seeing the Great White shark’s size for the first time, said ‘you’re gonna need a bigger boat.’

Does media have anything like that size in stock?

Can the FakeNews media push this much deceit for these hypocrites?

CA has twice the population of NY, and 1/10th the cases & deaths from WuFlu?

We’ve been blogging for weeks that numbers don’t add up on WuFlu hysteria that the media relentlessly inflicts on our American psyche, and CA-v-NY stats back us up.

NY has 19.44 million people; CA has 39.99 million. Having two times the population of New York, logic dictates CA should have twice as many WuFlu cases and deaths.

NOT.EVEN.CLOSE.

NY has almost ten times the cases (92,381-v-10,018), and over ten times the deaths (2,373-v-215) compared to California. Some speculate CA already went through what NY is experiencing now SEVERAL MONTHS AGO…and logic supports that point.

CA bore the brunt of China incoming travel during the time thought to have been the inception of Wuhan Flu (Nov-Dec)…were CA WuFlu cases blended with seasonal flu?

Plus, if experts consider the poor as the most-at-risk in a flu pandemic, CA has over  twice as many poor as NY (6.25mn vs 2.76mn). By all conceivable measures, CA should be a hotspot now, and the fact that it’s so far behind in the WuFlu numbers game…based on all common sense factors…demonstrates the worst is behind CA.

Why panic here?

It may be a good idea to start our economy up, from the West coast, eastward.

Surely this anomaly hasn’t escaped the ‘experts’ monitoring this situation?

Or, maybe this explains why they’re continuing to deliberately ignore the obvious…

“Newsom: Coronavirus an Opportunity to Create a New “Progressive Era” to “Reshape the Way We Do Business and How We Govern” (VIDEO)”

Remember the Democrat motto: ‘Never let a good crisis go to waste.’

Rush Limbaugh channels BlueCollar

One of our previous blogs noted “Left-wing policies exacerbate pandemics”

…from reusable plastic bags to mass-transit to anti-suburban living. When it comes to contagion, nothing feeds a pandemic faster than enforcement of Left-wing policy.

Open borders; globalism…all these Leftie policies put us at risk in pandemics.

Rush covered those same topics today, further validating our blog.

Left-wing ‘control-the-masses’ policies do not survive first contact with Wuhan Flu.

It would be wise to consider that during the November election.

Any bets what political affiliation in IRS posed necessity-to-file for SS recipients to receive stimulus $?

We’re betting the IRS official who specified that Social Security recipients must file a return to get part of the just passed stimulus has a (D) after his/her/its name.

The law as passed stated there was no necessity for SS recipients to file. What are the odds an IRS deep-stater opposing Pres Trump did it to make him look bad with seniors?

Who in their right mind believes this was done at the President’s command?

Just askin’…?

Prediction: an anti-Trump/pro-Democrat election ad-spot is being fabricated as we blog.