The idiocy of “can’t vote for Trump’ers”

We had a great respect for Stephen Hayes…until today’s column in the Weekly Standard.

Writing in Senator Lee for president was his moral imperative…and nobody has a right to impugn that act.

What is morally repugnant was his choice to write about it publicly, thereby inviting similar futility from other voters.

First…

One political party supports Big Government, entitlement programs, and high taxes.

The other party supports Business…and if anyone isn’t aware of it, Business drives America.

Voting for that party supports what drives America…voting any other way hamstrings that effort.

Second, our Constitution provides checks-&-balances that controls excesses of any one branch of government.

Just because a gutless Congress is afraid to exert controls against a black president doesn’t mean they’d fear exerting it over Trump.

(If anything,they’d over-exert themselves.)

So, to invoke a lawless out-of-control Trump as a reason not to vote for that party’s president is disingenuous at best…deceitful at worst.

If you don’t believe anything else about your gutless Congress Republicans, believe this…

…they’re more afraid of offending Democrats and the media, than offending Trump.

Mr. Hayes…you disappoint.

It’s down to this…

If you want billion$ sent to terrorist-enabler Iran…

…if you want a continued anemic economy…

…if you want higher out-of-pocket health costs…

…if you want Rule-of-Law applied ONLY to non-Democrats…

…then don’t vote ‘Republican’.

When the Party of the KKK brings up the specter of the KKK…that’s desperation

Pretty strange, when Democrats warn of evil tactics they themselves spawned.

Obama and Hillary bringing up the threat that Trump being elected would bring back the KKK is bizarre…considering the KKK was a Democrat creation.

Just as bizarre as warning of a return of Bull Connor tactics and Jim Crow laws…

…also Democrat creations.

 

When it comes to ‘evidence’, the Executive Branch is the one in denial

Obama’s out campaigning for Democrats, complaining (if he gets elected) Trump’s planning to ignore evidence in order to throw Hillary in jail.

That’s rich, considering it’s Obama’s Justice Dept that’s obscuring evidence, and obstructing lawful efforts to get to that evidence.

(He won’t allow his Justice Dept. to convene a Grand Jury, which effectively bars the FBI from issuing any subpoenas for evidence.)

So the guy blocking access to evidence complains Trump will ignore evidence? In the Land of Gall, Barack Obama takes the cake when it comes to faux outrage.

And now we hear a top Justice Dept. official leaked info to the Clinton team in 2015 that her email chicanery was being investigated.

Honest Democrats should be appalled at the despicable tactics of their leadership.

They should not reward such criminals Nov 8.

White House-orchestrated DoJ coverup of Hillary’s email scandal WAY beyond Watergate

Those now comparing Hillary’s email scandal to the Watergate scandal seem focused only on her. But it’s Obama’s Justice Dept appointees doing the dirty work, and it’s really about veiling HIS culpability…

..’cuz he was private-emailing too.

So, yeah, it was about a (President) Nixon cover-up then, just as it’s (not so much a Hillary cover-up as) a President Obama cover-up now.

And before Liberals start asking why it even really matters, remember the FBI did find indications emails were HACKED (which jeopardized national security)…

…including emails revealing Amb. Stevens’s activities JUST PRIOR to a Benghazi tragedy…that claimed 4 American lives….including Amb. Stevens.

And, please remember…NO ONE DIED from the Watergate scandal.

Yeah…it matters.

This is way beyond a Watergate-level scandal…

…Obama’s and Clinton’s unsecured email activities cost American lives.

PERIOD.

FULL STOP.

(UPDATED) Don’t be surprised if Hillary drops out…and Michelle O steps in…

With the latest rumors swirling, sounds like Wikileaks will drop a bombshell on Hillary this next week.

We’ve said it before…don’t be surprised to see Michelle Obama ‘talked into running’ to save the Democrats, when Hillary goes down.

Actually, we wouldn’t be surprised to find out that the Obamas have been behind this Wikileaks effort all along.

Certainly would explain why Democrats were so willing to serve up such a flawed candidate, wouldn’t it? Wait for it…

After all…wasn’t it an Obama-ite who said…

“Never Let A Good Crisis Go To Waste”?

We predicted something like this in our April post, re, Michelle O stepping in…

…Woman? Check

…Outsider? Check

…Minority Vote-Getter? Check. Check.

All it will take is one Wikileaks email dump making Hillary radioactive.

This week is gonna be interesting, folks.

(UPDATE) Another scenario to consider if Hillary is forced out is asking VP contender Kaine to step up to the Presidential slot, then Kaine chooses Michelle O for VP slot.

You’d think a sexual predator’s accomplice would be more newsworthy

For all the media’s focus on dubious claims from adult industry bimbo’s that Trump molested/pawed/innuendoed them decades ago, there’s a perfect comeback…

…why doesn’t a sexual predator’s ACCOMPLICE like Hillary get more scrutiny?

Bill Clinton’s predation is fact, as is Hillary’s coordinated effort to destroy his victims.

Media should be reminded of this whenever they hit Trump with ‘sudden revelations’ that are of suspect origins, since his accusers never stepped forward before.

Such a response from Trump could blunt their tactics and draw blood on this issue.

But, then, would it matter? For media, seems ‘if it bleeds, it leads’ never happens…

…when it’s a Clinton’s blood being drawn.

And, if media protests that Bill Clinton’s not on the ticket, the response is obvious…

…his accomplice IS.