House Democrats have a HUGE scandal on their hands…and a federal judge may be covering for them…at least, until after the upcoming November midterm elections.

Some 40+ Democrat members of the House of Representatives hired an unqualified group of Pakistanis to run their information technology, giving (as it turns out) illegal access to in many cases very highly classified congressional information.

The aides weren’t properly vetted, would never have qualified for security clearances, have since been exposed (some arrested), and Imran Awan is scheduled for a trial that inexplicably never seems to materialize…in the ‘land of the right-to-a-speedy-trial’.

Turns out the (Bill Clinton-appointed) judge delaying proceedings may be trying to keep all of the scandal this story represents under wraps until after the November elections.

California’s attorney general Xavier Becerra was leading the House Democratic Caucus at the time – it was his server Awan used to stash illegally accessed information. Up for election in California in November, he doesn’t want a bad national security scandal.

For that matter, quite a few House Democrats would be hurt by a trial that exposes the very real story of how seriously they jeopardized our national security, allowing massive data breaches that could even have been done remotely while they were in Pakistan.

Shouldn’t the media be all over this huge scandal?

National security continues to poll as a strong issue among American voters. How long will it take before Republicans start using campaign platforms to expose this failure?

“Clinton Blames Her Loss on White Women Listening to Their Husbands“

Her contention being that wives were compelled to vote Republican by husbands.

Evidently Hilllary’s under the impression that American women are so stupid they didn’t realize they could vote however they wanted behind the polling place curtains.

(Either that, or she thinks we’re too stupid to realize her comments are illogical.)

Joy Behar finally publicly apologized to VP Pence for her remarks about his Christian religion, but we can’t help but wonder about the motivation behind that apology.

In February on ‘The View’ she mocked his Christian beliefs: “Like I said before, it’s one thing to talk to Jesus. It’s another thing when Jesus talks to you,” Behar said. “That’s called mental illness, if I’m not correct. Hearing voices.”

Now she says “I was raised to respect everyone’s religious faith…I fell short of that…”

Did she ‘fall short’…or was it because she heard Oprah’s remark that she’s waiting to hear from God before making any decision about running for office in 2020?

After all, it’s one thing to mock a Republican…quite another to mock The Oprah.

Now the only attorney general ever to be held in contempt by Congress joins the typical Democrat anti-Trump smear effort, over the House Intel report clearing the President of Russia collusion…although GOP Rep. Nunes does say Democrats colluded with them.

Now we’re finding out Obama hired Russia-colluding FusionGPS to dig dirt on Romney.

Russia collusion? You bet…too bad it’s the wrong Party where evidence is available…

…otherwise, FakeNews media would be all over it.

If ethics were a criteria for public office, the Democrat Party would be an empty room.

Pull quote from Andy McCarthy’s National Review article: “The House Intelligence Committee has concluded that there is “no evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy” between the Trump campaign and the Russian regime.”

But, of course, the Democrat Minority Ranking member, Adam Schiff, sees it differently claiming “…the committee’s Republicans had elevated the interests of protecting the president over protecting the country.” (Translation: he doesn’t agree with GOP findings)

Schiff is notorious as a leaker-extraordinaire…if he wants to claim or IMPLY there may be proof, or evidence that supports his innuendo – why doesn’t he just LEAK IT?

The man’s been leaking non-stop since this House Intel committee investigation began,  so if he doesn’t leak evidence that backs up his cowardly implication…?

Short answer? He’s a tiresome, mewling LIAR.

Everyone in journalism knows this to be fact – when a Democrat con-artist like Schiff doesn’t leak proof that supports their case…it’s because they have NO proof.

ANY Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee that implies they know a different story than the Republican findings should be forced to put up…or shut up…and if they insist on continuing innuendo campaigns, absent evidence to support their claims…

…they should be brought up on ethics charges.

It’s time to stop the campaign of cheap, ad-hominem attacks against a sitting President.

One way, or the other.

Fox News headliner: “Trump’s meeting with North Korea’s Kim will be historic…and logistically complicated“

As the Left’s collective heads explode over the concept that Trump has achieved what their glorious leaders failed to manage for decades, it can only be described as hilarious to declare a meeting location between the President and ‘rocket boy’ as…complicated.

(We’d suggest Guantanamo, but Dear Leader Kim might see that as…suspicious.)

As to the substance of such a meeting, is ‘de-nuke’ and ‘verify’ too concise?

Hey, Puerto Rico – you got the government you voted for – for decades…

…and if the result isn’t making you happy since the latest hurricane revealed your lousy crumbling infrastructure due to crony socialism…you only have yourselves to blame.

Voting for the equivalent of a Democrat Party in that island for decades yielded a close look at what socialism does when applied liberally, and Trump’s administration can’t be blamed for the result – or for the ongoing lousy implementation of repairs now.

We don’t need to look at Venezuela to see Socialism’s failure…it’s right offshore.

Monthly savings due to GOP tax cuts are “Crumbs”? Bonuses were a “Scam”?

Republican tax cuts will be an “Economic Armageddon“?

Nancy Pelosi’s nothing if not hysterical, but her claim of ‘Armageddon’ may prove a worthy prediction…if it’s applied against what could happen to DEMOCRATS this Nov.

NOT ONE DEMOCRAT voted for the tax cuts. They damned the cuts, in concert.

And that will hang around their necks more heavily as the mid-terms draw near.

Now American workers are seeing bigger take-home paychecks, bonuses continue to be doled out, and employment is booming as the American economy expands…

…yeah, yeah…rage against THAT machine, Democrats.

Whether it be in California, or the Nation as a whole…

• If you don’t believe in gun-rights to protect yourself and your family…
• If you are okay with schoolkids put in danger with myopic pandering policies…
• If you like lower wages and lost jobs because of illegal immigration…
• If you are happier being dependent on foreign energy imports…
• If you hate the expanding economy and jobs that corporate tax-cuts provide…
• If you would rather not have more take-home pay due to personal tax-cuts…
• If you want crazy leaders of No. Korea and Iran to continue nuke ambitions…
• If you prefer to see black and Hispanic Americans’ joblessness rise…
• If you love the sanctuary open borders policy that jeopardizes nat’l security…
• If you crave more of that lying FakeNews ‘Russia-ate-our-election‘ narrative…
• If you don’t mind higher prices at the gas-pump and in your electric bills…
• If  you have no problem with crony corporate capitalism and pay-to-play politics…
• If you think household net worth increases aren’t really that important…

…then, by all means, vote ‘Democrat’ this November.

Simple, no?

“Dems: Uranium One informant provided ‘no evidence’ of Clinton ‘quid pro quo’“

(Other than, of course, the tens of millions of dollars Russians gave her Foundation.)

Yeah, yeah…nothing to see here folks.