What Hath Republicans Wrought?

“Dec 6 – On this day back in 1865 the 13th Amendment ending slavery is ratified”

The Republican Party was founded in 1854, with an anti-slavery platform. Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican President, championed Emancipation Proclamation.

“The Emancipation Proclamation, or Proclamation 95, was a presidential proclamation and executive order issued by United States President Abraham Lincoln effective January 1, 1863.” One of the most impactful executive orders ever written.

Today’s Republican Party, with President Trump as its leader, has reduced black unemployment to record low numbers; increased net income; and push for programs that will guarantee the future of the black American community, such as school choice.

It’s high time black Americans recognized which Party truly is worthy of their support.

Seriously, libtards…if Ukraine corruption & election meddling is an issue, your guys will go down

Screams from the Liberals emanate seconds after our previous post, challenging the concept that – if anyone is at risk – Democrats with serious background problems are.

Think about it: at issue is the call President Trump made with the Ukrainian president, asking him to investigate corruption and 2016 election meddling. If Liberals believe that somehow, Democrats are immune from those issues, we have a bridge we’ll sell them.

Democrats allege the request for investigations were meant for Trump’s political gain; it doesn’t take a legal expert to know that opens the door to ‘what occurred, and when’?

Does anyone believe Obama, Biden, or Clinton want this to go to the Senate?

Was there corruption, extortion, quid-pro-quo? Even Biden admits there was…on video.

Was there 2016 election meddling? Even our media and the Ukraine admits there was.

Can the President justify asking Ukraine to investigate this? YOU BET.

Corruption and election meddling is troubling: it needs to be…it must be…investigated.

But, think about this for a minute…such an investigation can only be ‘politically beneficial’ for a Republican president or Party if Democrats are GUILTY.

Democrat-fawning media can only obscure so much – being under investigation will be inevitably downplayed or ignored…but PROVEN GUILT can’t be swept under a rug.

It’s too late to be careful what you ask for, libtards…looks like you’re gonna get it.

Defined: Arrogance & Elitism…before the fall

In a baffling display of detached, clueless behavior, elitist and arrogant Democrats bring 3 elitist and arrogant Left-wing lawyers to the SHAMpeachment hearing for all to see.

It was soon established that not one of these so-called legal ‘experts’ had personal knowledge of a single material fact that makes up all the Democrats’ ‘charges’…

…yet, all three of them said…based on NO EVIDENCE OR PROOF...’yes, impeach’.

One went so far as to claim ESP, implying that, when the President asked the Ukraine leader to help ‘us’, that meant ‘the Royal We’ (Trump)…rather than America as a whole.

This is what they’re reduced to…ESP and opinion…as opposed to material facts.

There’s not one material fact in Democrat charges…3 Left-wing proven Trump-hating lawyers just confirmed that fact on LIVE TV…but that won’t convince the rabid mob.

(And, we sure as hell won’t hear about it on CNN.)

The single GOP ‘witness’ – himself, a Left-wing lawyer – said it best: (paraphrasing) ‘…if this is the best you Democrats have, YOU yourselves are guilty of abuse of power…’

We agree with the President – let’s wrap this SHAM up, impeach, then open the bag of real corruption, abuse-of-power, bribery, and extortion for all to see…in the Senate trial.

On all those charges they have opinion; but Republicans have material facts PROVING the previous Obama administration, and many current Democrats, guilty as charged.

Ironically, the arrogance and elitism Democrats are trying to use to obscure those facts are the SAME characteristics that energized American citizens…to vote ‘Trump’ in 2016.

By all means…let this SHAMpeachment play out.

Pelosi and Democrats think their media can carry the water for them in this process, but if current public opinion is any factor, they’ll soon discover that thought is a forlorn hope.

Biden, Clinton, Pelosi, Obama – all are wrapped up in past Ukraine shenanigans, and in the Senate…where the President will be allowed to make HIS case…it will come out.

And, then…please God…the American WE can get on with our lives.

Faster, please.

The one HUGE item missing from Dem hearing ‘witnesses’ certitude

Surprise, surprise…3 of Nadler’s legal ‘experts’ proclaim Trump impeachable.

Bbuttttt…there’s one little problem: their opinions are built on hearsay and opinion.

Shouldn’t legal ‘experts’ understand the need for factual proof, and evidence?

Which is the HUGE missing item in the Democrat SHAMpeachment process.

Thus, we’re left with the final legal expert (Jonathan Turley) to explain the problem, telling the Democrats “If you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power.” (all emphasis added)

B-O-O-M!!!

I know you are, but what am I…?

In a classic example of projection…

“Dem Impeachment Report Accuses Trump of Abusing Power, Obstruction, Intimidating, Threatening and Tampering with Witnesses”

House Democrats…

  • abuse their power, with an unfounded SHAMpeachment process;
  • obstruct corruption investigations, by claiming political privilege/immunity;
  • intimidate and threaten, with subpoenas and media harassment;
  • and tamper with their own witnesses, in secret grooming sessions…

…then accuse President Trump of those deeds?

Hmmm…shouldn’t constitutionality of impeachment have been considered first…?

First ‘witnesses’ Democrats call…constitutional lawyers to determine just cause?

So, after months of SHAMpeachment angst and subterfuge in Democrat-controlled House Select Intelligence Committee secret meetings and subsequent ‘hearings’…

…they’ve decided NOW is the time to consider what, exactly, constitutionally justifies an impeachment proceeding? Shouldn’t that have been done FIRST?

They think this tactic will send the public-opinion ball over the impeachment goalpost?

And they’ve got the gall to use blatantly Left-leaning Trump-hating lawyers to do it?

The only thing they’ve done is expose their contempt for American voters.

How hard is it to admire a guy who stands up against a rabid Party, vile Media, & seditious intel agencies?

Seriously.

They’ve thrown everything at him: lies, lures, distortion, disinformation, and FakeNews.

He’s still standing tall, as those attacking him watch their support and approval crumble.

Question for GOP never-Trump’ers: who of your choosing could do this?

Anyone…anyone…?

And he’s right about this: his attackers are really after US…he’s just in their way.

STANDING TALL.

Hail to the Trump.

Anyone need PROOF that Left-wing judges are hopelessly biased?

Any doubt about a hopelessly biased left-wing judiciary is gone, with this latest ruling of an Obama-appointed judge that Trump’s lawyer must appear before Congress, judging by Andrew McCarthy’s take on exactly how that judge’s 120-page opinion was worded.

The lawyer, McGahn, served as a former counsel to Pres. Trump, and it seems likely that Democrats want his testimony to build a case about ‘obstruction…or something’ in relation to activities, rumor, and allegations whirling around during Mueller’s probe.

In McCarthy’s article “There’s Less to the McGahn Ruling Than Meets the Eye” he notes that “What Judge Jackson actually ordered is that McGahn must show up in compliance with the House Judiciary Committee’s subpoena. She did not direct him to provide any actual testimony.(We’re left to wonder how that took 120 pages?)

Got that? Here’s a Harvard-educated lawyer-now-judge…who’s been in the legal end of the DC swamp for 23 years…somehow screwing up a ruling to allow a loophole dodge.

Or…is it a screw-up? We suggest it’s more likely a set-up.

First-year lawyers understand the need for iron-clad contracts that exclude even a mere possibility of loopholes…how can a Harvard cum laude graduate make such a blunder?

Did we mention she’s had 23 years of lawyer/judicial experience?

If the former Trump lawyer takes the bait, ‘shows up’ – then refuses to testify – it will be screamed from rooftops that Trump-&-co. are pulling a dodge, and hiding something.

Doesn’t matter no crime’s been committed…they’ll play up the appearance of one.

(With, of course, willing aid of a FakeNews media bent on destroying this President.)

This is just another game Democrats play, and they’re using a district judge to do it. A district judge who, we suggest, deliberately baited the hook…with a loophole-worm.

If McCarthy’s assessment is right, Judge Ketjani Brown Jackson is a partisan hack…

…or conveniently incompetent (120 pages?)…either way, unworthy of that office.