Hmmm…

$200k Russian ad buy ‘huge meddling’, Democrat $12mn+ disinfo effort…not so much?

Seriously – How do they ignore the millions Democrats spent tampering?

Obama’s director of Nat’l Intel says 2016 Russian meddling was ‘widespread’.

But according to social media giants, Russian ad buys during 2016 presidential totaled tens of thousands…and half of those ad buys actually occurred AFTER the election.

(And half of all ads were negative to Trump.)

And, then, there’s Dept of Justice acting Dir. Rosenstein’s comments after the Russian indictments “…there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.” (bold emphasis added)

Yet, the DNC & Hillary campaign spent millions through cut-out lawyers, funding the tampering efforts of FusionGPS, Steele’s dirt dossier, and paying off FakeNews media.

And ALL that money was spent BEFORE the election, to tamper with and affect results.

Widespread…

…sure, if you count Democrat efforts with foreigners…where’s the outrage?

While pondering that, let’s use more Rosenstein (same press conference) to crush ‘not exonerated’ talk: “I want to caution you that everyone charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court. At trial, prosecutors must introduce credible evidence that is sufficient to prove each defendant guilty beyond any reasonable doubt to a unanimous jury.” (bold, underline emphasis added)

Collusion evidence? No. Collusion charges/indictments? No.

‘Innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.’ 

BOOM. Mueller’s ‘not exonerated’ meme falls apart.

Homework assignment…

…explain how $12million+ election tampering is less noteworthy than $200k ‘Russia meddling’…and how ‘not exonerated’ instead of presumed innocent is justifiable.

(‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ excuses will not be acceptable.)

Class dismissed.

Jul 25, 1954 to Nov 01, 1999

BlueCollar has long been Pittsburgh Steelers black-&-gold…

…but Walter Payton was the Epitome of a Running Back.

You are missed, Sweetness.

Democrats use of Bob Mueller yesterday should be categorized as Elder Abuse.

That said…

Yesterday several things became glaringly obvious: Mueller didn’t write the report, and didn’t hire the special counsel team; lack of awareness proves he didn’t run the probe.

Since this farce began, BlueCollar has made the case that this whole thing was a cover-up effort to shield Democrats…the real perpetrators, their misdeeds, and illegalities.

Because, when it comes to ‘election-tampering’, everything was there to see: arranging foreign disinformation, setting up lures to entangle the opposition, and more important…

…exonerating Hillary from her email scandal with a non-credible ‘intent’ scenario.

Because, don’t forget – Hillary was the Democrat presidential candidate: the first act in their false-flag operation was to inoculate her from legal misdeeds…felonies, actually.

Once that critical first step of the election-tampering process was accomplished, setting  up the opponent was the second step…to use in an election-affecting October surprise.

Obama ran the federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies putting the process in motion; lures (Halper, Mifsud, Veselnitskya, et al), disinformation (Steele dossier), etc.

And, when the unthinkable happened – Trump won! – they used that combined FBI-CIA effort to delegitimize and hamstring Trump…and veil what they had been doing.

Democrats have a big problem though: there’s no smoking gun to take down President Trump…all they’ve got is innuendo, a veneer of impropriety, and flimsy ‘obstruction’.

Nothing culpable; no damning phone/conversation recordings, no emails, no letters…

…NOTHING.

But, wait…there is OVERWHELMING available evidence – against Democrats.

Hillary’s private server WAS a felony; FusionGPS/Steele were paid by Democrats; lures were used for entrapment; FISA warrants were illegally obtained…to affect an election.

Funny thing is, the ‘Mueller’ probe never went down that road…

…even though he was instructed to investigate ALL MATTERS that may arise from an election-tampering probe. How is the provable Democrat activity not probe-worthy?

Can’t wait for Chapter Two…authored by Attorney General Barr.

Painful. Cringe-worthy.

That’s the only way to describe Mueller’s handling of the Democrat impeach circus.

Republicans, with few exceptions, showed him to be a one-sided witch-hunter, failing to indict collusion-hoaxsters for lies…and failing to probe Hillary’s ties to Russian disinfo.

And, revealed him as a Machiavellian prosecutor…willfully distorting legal realities.

They pointed out a prosecutor’s job is never ‘not to exonerate’…but to prove guilt. And just as important, knowledge of one’s innocence eliminates any corrupt intent protesting that innocence, or efforts to get the ‘investigation’ fact-focused and properly directed.

Democrats fell all over themselves in a Volume2 mouth-foaming frenzy that fell short, while leaving Robert Mueller dazed and confused…then refuting his own testimony.

What’s next?

We predict Democrats will now turn on their ‘circus bear’ Mueller, and demand a new probe based on the obvious conclusion that he wasn’t a competent special counsel…

…while blithely ignoring the obvious…

…Mueller’s #1 guy Weismann ran this investigation farce all along.

Rush Limbaugh tried to explain how ridiculous it was for Mueller to claim he ‘could not exonerate’ the President, by explaining the presumption-of-innocence legal concept.

He noted, in legal proceedings, guilty or not guilty are the standard; the accused pleads ‘not guilty’…never ‘innocent’ – and a prosecution’s job is to prove the accused’s guilt…

…not ‘we can’t exonerate’ when they can’t prove guilt.

But, using an example of a ‘Scumbag B’ being charged, tried, yet found not guilty as a result is an unfortunate verbiage, as it will open FakeNews to the opportunity of claiming Rush has equated President Trump as a scumbag by use of that term in his dialogue.

Rush Limbaugh is normally sensitive to how his statements can be twisted, which adds to the mystery of why he’d use such a term so obviously exploitable by FakeNews.

Just sayin’.

Watching this latest Mueller hearing, we’re witnessing the definition of ‘IMPLODE’.

First, we see Mueller dodging questions of why he didn’t indict the liars that started all this collusion-hoax hoopla, even as he indicted pro-Trump’ers affected by those lies.

(FusionGPS Simpson, and Steele, the dossier author…not indicted. Why? They lied to congressional committees, and probably Mueller. The Steele-dossier is a tissue of lies, it’s unsubstantiated…yet was used as a foundation to indict Trump aides for lying.)

But, somehow, Mueller doesn’t have knowledge of who/what FusionGPS is?

How can that make any sense…to anyone?

And then, Rep. Gohmert (R-TX) dropped a hammer. He noted obstruction requires ‘corrupt intent’…but knowledge of one’s innocence ELIMINATES corrupt intent.

Pres Trump knew he was innocent; his actions were driven by that knowledge.

Democrats are zeroed in on impeaching for a corrupt act that CAN’T BE CORRUPT.

Cue IMPLOSION.

1.) Have you met with Democrats to prep for this hearing?

2.) Why did you change the special counsel mandate to ‘proving collusion wasn’t done’ when your special council mandate was to find whether collusion WAS done?

3.) What Justifies A Probe Based Solely On Opponent-Funded Allegations?

It’s all about agenda…Democrat agenda…from start to finish (if ever there’s a finish).

These last three years have been all about undermining, hamstringing, and otherwise delegitimizing Pres. Trump…tomorrow’s meeting is just one more effort in that regard.

If Mueller honestly believes his report should stand on its own, there would be no need to meet with Democrats to prep answers…unless it’s a furtherance of their agenda.

It was Mueller’s task to determine (with proof) if collusion occurred, and not his job to determine collusion wasn’t done. Mueller contorted a possible task, to an impossible one…proving a negative. Why? Twisting that mandate furthers a Democrat agenda.

BlueCollar has previously noted ‘hacking’ was concluded by CrowdStrike, a Democrat-contracted private firm. The allegation of ‘collusion’ meetings was based on a dirt-dossier fabricated from ‘sources’ of Steele, and Democrat-funded through FusionGPS.

(As of this posting, none of the collusive-meeting allegations have been substantiated. Most revealing…Democrats refused to allow FBI access to their ‘hacked’ servers.)

And leads to the most important question of the three…

What Justifies A Probe Based Solely On Opponent-Funded Allegations?

It’s all a farce – a fraud – and has been from the start.

The sickening reality here is that Democrats continue thinking they can pull it off.

FakeNews Alert   FakeNews Alert   FakeNews Alert   FakeNews Alert   FakeNews Alert

Another day…new hysteria. At the Washington Examiner today: “Justice Department letter to Robert Mueller wasn’t the ‘warning’ the media keep saying it was”

“CNN on Tuesday morning breathlessly covered a letter sent to Mueller by the Justice Department the previous day, which guides Mueller to only testify to the content of the 400-page report he released earlier this year. CNN repeatedly called the letter a “warning” to Mueller from the Justice Department, once again setting Mueller up as the white knight in this endless nightmare.” As usual, CNN wasn’t quite forthcoming…

…and failed to mention MUELLER ASKED FOR THAT GUIDANCE!

“…the letter was nothing more than a reply to Mueller who himself asked the department for guidance on the parameters of his upcoming testimony. The letter notes at the very top that Mueller requested “that the Department provide you with guidance concerning privilege or other legal bars applicable to potential testimony.” The missive then goes on to recall that Mueller had already previously said in a public statement that any testimony he might be called on to provide would pertain only to his written report. It reminds Mueller there are court orders and regulations, though, that prevent him or anyone else connected with the special counsel office to discuss any ongoing legal matters and that it would violate department policy to discuss “the conduct of uncharged third-parties” (i.e. President Trump).” (bold, underline added)

Yeah – more fabricated outrage…over a nothing-burger.

(If anyone thinks this latest hype wasn’t pre-fabbed between Mueller and the FakeNews media w-that DOJ ‘guidance request’, we’ve got Arizona ocean-front property for sale.)

Does anyone else share concern over a Party that turns up the outrage while American prosperity blooms? Their anger increases in direct proportion to Republican success.

Their hysteria leads to one assumption – it’s more about Party than it’s about America.

Who wants to support a political Party that hopes for America’s decline?

Anyone?

Anyone?

“I’m NOT a Democrat”

Arguing when accused of racism is like waking someone pretending to sleep. Absent solid evidence, ‘racist’ accusations imply someone can read your heart…or mind.

Witness ‘open-border’ activists claiming secure-border advocates as racist, despite the inconvenient fact of human-traffickers’, drug smugglers’, and terrorist efforts to get in. National security concerns? You bet. Racist? Not unless they can read minds/hearts.

Not possible; so, the only way to shut down the accuser? Throw it back at them.

The best response to unfair accusations of being racist is “I’m NOT a Democrat”.

Provable acts of racism are: creating a KKK, Jim Crow laws, & Bull Connor tactics. It’s demanding segregation, back-of-bus seating, and violence to subdue black voting.

ALL creations/actions of Democrats…PROVABLY SO.

So, unless there’s solid evidence someone’s in that group…sorry, but…no.

Then there’s this: False accusations relying on mind-reading are racist in their intent.

Contrast solid evidence of racism with someone claiming to be able to read your heart, and it’s obvious – the most provable forms of racism are clearly Democrat-created…

…at least, until such accusers can prove mind-reading skills.

BOOM!