Hmmm…

$200k Russian ad buy ‘huge meddling’, Democrat $12mn+ disinfo effort…not so much?

Seriously – How do they ignore the millions Democrats spent tampering?

Obama’s director of Nat’l Intel says 2016 Russian meddling was ‘widespread’.

But according to social media giants, Russian ad buys during 2016 presidential totaled tens of thousands…and half of those ad buys actually occurred AFTER the election.

(And half of all ads were negative to Trump.)

And, then, there’s Dept of Justice acting Dir. Rosenstein’s comments after the Russian indictments “…there is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.” (bold emphasis added)

Yet, the DNC & Hillary campaign spent millions through cut-out lawyers, funding the tampering efforts of FusionGPS, Steele’s dirt dossier, and paying off FakeNews media.

And ALL that money was spent BEFORE the election, to tamper with and affect results.

Widespread…

…sure, if you count Democrat efforts with foreigners…where’s the outrage?

While pondering that, let’s use more Rosenstein (same press conference) to crush ‘not exonerated’ talk: “I want to caution you that everyone charged with a crime is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court. At trial, prosecutors must introduce credible evidence that is sufficient to prove each defendant guilty beyond any reasonable doubt to a unanimous jury.” (bold, underline emphasis added)

Collusion evidence? No. Collusion charges/indictments? No.

‘Innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.’ 

BOOM. Mueller’s ‘not exonerated’ meme falls apart.

Homework assignment…

…explain how $12million+ election tampering is less noteworthy than $200k ‘Russia meddling’…and how ‘not exonerated’ instead of presumed innocent is justifiable.

(‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ excuses will not be acceptable.)

Class dismissed.