1.) Have you met with Democrats to prep for this hearing?

2.) Why did you change the special counsel mandate to ‘proving collusion wasn’t done’ when your special council mandate was to find whether collusion WAS done?

3.) What Justifies A Probe Based Solely On Opponent-Funded Allegations?

It’s all about agenda…Democrat agenda…from start to finish (if ever there’s a finish).

These last three years have been all about undermining, hamstringing, and otherwise delegitimizing Pres. Trump…tomorrow’s meeting is just one more effort in that regard.

If Mueller honestly believes his report should stand on its own, there would be no need to meet with Democrats to prep answers…unless it’s a furtherance of their agenda.

It was Mueller’s task to determine (with proof) if collusion occurred, and not his job to determine collusion wasn’t done. Mueller contorted a possible task, to an impossible one…proving a negative. Why? Twisting that mandate furthers a Democrat agenda.

BlueCollar has previously noted ‘hacking’ was concluded by CrowdStrike, a Democrat-contracted private firm. The allegation of ‘collusion’ meetings was based on a dirt-dossier fabricated from ‘sources’ of Steele, and Democrat-funded through FusionGPS.

(As of this posting, none of the collusive-meeting allegations have been substantiated. Most revealing…Democrats refused to allow FBI access to their ‘hacked’ servers.)

And leads to the most important question of the three…

What Justifies A Probe Based Solely On Opponent-Funded Allegations?

It’s all a farce – a fraud – and has been from the start.

The sickening reality here is that Democrats continue thinking they can pull it off.