Rush Limbaugh tried to explain how ridiculous it was for Mueller to claim he ‘could not exonerate’ the President, by explaining the presumption-of-innocence legal concept.

He noted, in legal proceedings, guilty or not guilty are the standard; the accused pleads ‘not guilty’…never ‘innocent’ – and a prosecution’s job is to prove the accused’s guilt…

…not ‘we can’t exonerate’ when they can’t prove guilt.

But, using an example of a ‘Scumbag B’ being charged, tried, yet found not guilty as a result is an unfortunate verbiage, as it will open FakeNews to the opportunity of claiming Rush has equated President Trump as a scumbag by use of that term in his dialogue.

Rush Limbaugh is normally sensitive to how his statements can be twisted, which adds to the mystery of why he’d use such a term so obviously exploitable by FakeNews.

Just sayin’.