You can’t make this stuff up – Newsweek.com story last Thursday: “Stormy Daniels: Politics and Donald Trump Have ‘Completely Destroyed’ My Career”
So a woman who signed a non-disclosure agreement that she then violated is now casting blame on the President and politics for completely destroying her career?
We can’t wait to hear how that logic explains itself.
Our Friday blog said it all…“Double down on Russia-collusion probe, order it EXPANDED…to include proven Democrat malfeasance”
As noted, it’s within parameters of Deputy Att’y Gen’l Rosenstein’s instructions to probe “…any matters that arose or may arise…from the investigation.” (emphasis added)
According to the Washington Times “Conservatives and the president ask why…the Clinton campaign has been excluded. It paid money to a foreign agent, Mr. Steele, who had numerous links to Russian government officials and used their information to influence the election and the U.S. political process.” (bold/underline emphasis added)
Pres Trump runs the Justice Dep’t, and can order such an expansion in the probe, even if it means he has to ask his Attorney General to add a second special counsel.
It’s WAY past due.
By definition, foreign actions on our Nation are held at arm’s length suspicion to verify intent…subversive actions made by our citizens in leadership roles are more insidious.
American political leadership is a position of trust – abusing that trust is unconscionable.
Democrats made a serious play at affecting the 2016 elections, using Steele (a British operative), to create and inflict a dossier, sourced through Russians, on Americans.
The special counsel team, Mueller’s Democrat cohort, claim the dossier doesn’t meet the same level of chicanery that Russian troll farms did, as an excuse not to indict.
BlueCollar disagrees.
Foreign activities must always be viewed with suspicion, but American activities such as this…one Party colluding w-foreign agents against another Party…abuses a trust.
Pedophile priests abuse their trust, as do dirty cops…
…how is what the Democrats pulled in 2016 any different?
Indict the REAL colluders.
FakeNews may crow about ‘restoration of a free press’ with this ruling that gave Acosta his press pass back temporarily, but it was the due-process Fifth amendment, not the free-speech First amendment, that resulted in the favorable ruling…regardless of hype.
The Washington Times: “A federal judge ordered the White House to restore CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s press pass, ruling Friday that President Trump and his aides didn’t give Mr. Acosta enough of a chance to explain himself or contest the revocation.”
According to the Times “Judge Kelly did not rule on the big First Amendment questions CNN raised, instead limiting his decision to whether the White House had acted arbitrarily in denying Mr. Acosta a thing of value — in this case, the press pass that CNN says is crucial to him doing his job.” (bold, underline emphasis added)
While many try to portray this as the President overstepping his bounds, it was clearly a correct move on his part to condemn Acosta, and highlight such uncouth behavior.
(Acosta did physically resist a female intern’s attempt to take the mic, acting in a rude and boorish manner, using the edge of his wrist and forearm to push her arm down.)
Anyway, it’s an opportunity to lay out clear rules on press decorum moving forward.
We’re not sure how Acosta could ‘explain himself’ in a way to justify his actions before getting his press pass revoked, but we have a hint for the President, going forward:
A restored press pass doesn’t mean Acosta should get his front-row seating back…
…and doesn’t mean he gets an opportunity for questions during press briefings.
The punk’s an actor, not a journalist – why give him camera time?
For that matter, why televise WH press briefings at all? It just feeds narcissism.
For 2 years, Democrats have used a ‘stop Trump from firing Mueller’ meme to fire up the Left, rake in cash from suckers, and falsely claim obstruction where there’s none.
It’s time to shut down the Left’s faux angst over Mueller’s employment concerns, and time to expose the collusion hoax for what it is…an attempt to delegitimize Pres. Trump.
Effective immediately, President Trump should call for an extended Russia-collusion probe, directing acting Attorney General Whitaker to add Democrat malfeasance to the investigation, reviewing data that Mueller has gathered to date on that side issue.
If Mueller’s probe has ignored the Democrat chicanery, that’s a HUGE indication there’s a partisan agenda in play…and the failure should be denounced in no uncertain terms.
Rosenstein’s instructions to Mueller were to “…conduct the investigation…including…(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and (iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).” (emphasis added)
Certainly, the discovery that a Democrat hoax-dossier was used for FISA warrants, and the revelation that Clinton’s campaign and DNC paid cut-out lawyers to fund the dossier which was created by a Brit (Steele) using unsubstantiated foreign sources qualifies.
There’s no evidence Pres. Trump colluded…but PROVEN evidence Democrats did.
End the charade…bring the REAL malefactors on stage.
Then we’ll see how long Democrats and their media masters want this probe prolonged.
We repeat…
Failing to address important key factors when exposing the Left’s chicanery is an ongoing problem for conservative media, especially if factors are singularly crucial to revealing the fundamental cause for their deceit…typically being money, and power.
On talk-radio this morning, a Liberal host spoke of porn-lawyer Avenatti’s latest cameo (involving accusations of domestic violence), bemoaning the ‘porn-lawyer’ descriptive.
He referred to the Stormy Daniels/anti-Kavanaugh-accusers lawyer as a ‘hero, speaking truth to power’ while his conservative (female) co-host sat, not challenging that claim.
She was silent when the Lib host defended CNN’s Jim Acosta ‘speaking truth to power as he badgered the President over the Russia collusion hoax, then was banned.
There’s not been one iota of proof on the Kavanaugh accusations or collusion issue.
What she should have challenged her co-host on was that there’s a huge difference between speaking ‘truth’ to power…and speaking UNFOUNDED allegations to power.
The ‘singularly crucial’ factor here is that anti-Kavanaugh accusations, and Russia-collusion accusations, were…have been…and continue to be…totally unfounded.
It’s astounding that conservative media allow every lying premise to go unchallenged.
Why the silence?
DON’T GIVE THEM AN INCH.
We repeat…
Failing to address important key factors when exposing the Left’s chicanery is an ongoing problem for conservative media, especially if factors are singularly crucial to revealing the fundamental cause for their deceit…typically being money, and power.
The climate change hoax is a typical example.
Investor’s Business Daily reports on the bogus Paris Climate Accord… “Climate Hoax: Not A Single G-20 Country Is Close To Hitting CO2 Emission Targets”…but…
…never linked the most ‘singularly crucial’ factor to the hoax….
…MONEY.
Those pushing the climate-change fraud are heavily invested in alternate energy and the billions of dollars/yuan/euros/whatever in subsidies derived from that hoax.
Why doesn’t respected conservative media like IBD mention that…every time?
Failing to address important key factors when exposing the Left’s chicanery is an ongoing problem for conservative media, especially if factors are singularly crucial to revealing the fundamental cause for their deceit…typically being money, and power.
Take the ongoing Election Deadline issues in Florida, for instance. Those deadlines are established for a reason, a primary one being to minimize opportunities for vote fraud.
But, in Democrat-controlled counties that (amazingly?) ‘can’t’ meet deadlines all other counties meet, is it any wonder that Democrat-appointed judges extend deadlines, where (amazingly?) more ‘uncounted’ Democrat votes are then suddenly discovered?
Did we mention the necessity to meet deadlines were Democrat controlled? Why can’t the conservative voices make that cynical observation when judiciary rulings are noted?
Did we mention all other counties didn’t seem to have a problem meeting deadlines?
Yes, all votes should be counted – but ensuring that it happens is on the shoulders of those who control the voting process within that county by utilizing resources properly.
How hard is it to deduce ‘suddenly discovered’ ballot boxes are orchestrated? It’s from the pages of a Democrat playbook…CREATE a crisis, then apply self-serving solutions.
The lax procedures and incompetent resources were totally under Democrat control.
The ‘singularly crucial’ factor here: DEMOCRATS created this ‘crisis’ to EXPLOIT it.
The choice? Honor deadlines, or let Democrats manipulate the process…again.
Look at it this way – when your kid breaks the liquor cabinet lock…
…the solution is not to let them DRINK the liquor.