In their efforts to sabotage Roy Moore with 38-year old accusations of misconduct, the Democrat-Left may end up having to sacrifice a good deal of their own in the process.

Claiming someone’s unsuitable for Senate office because of conduct from 40 years ago is a dog-whistle for Congress to clean house, in the face of allegations that lawmakers in that august set of chambers paid over $15 million lately to atone for their misconduct.

Joe Biden’s got a reputation; an Al Franken photo means he’s a goner; Bill Clinton will be sure to get lambasted (as should Hillary, with her attacks against Bill’s accusers)…

…and the list goes on.

Granted, we’re assuming Democrats make up the body of the $15 million in misconduct settlements, but we’re confident doing so…since Republican names aren’t mentioned.

(When will the uproar begin, over the fact TAX-DOLLARS make up that $15 million?)

Hey, Jesse Jackson…time to head for cover.

(Better yet – wouldn’t it be sweet to learn this whole anti-Moore kerfuffle was actually a GOP plot to cause sexually-crazed Democrats to implode from their own misconduct?)

Is there ANYTHING a Democrat politician and their media masters won’t do to malign good tax law…and protect the rich they so vociferously claim to despise?

This morning’s Washington Times headline: “Democrats cry foul about loss of deduction to muddle tax bill’s real benefits to middle class“

Pull quote:

“The Democrats’ complaints are overheated…Half of the (state/local tax deduction) benefits go to the richest 5% of earners, and nearly all families who would see their SALT deduction limited would receive bigger tax cuts elsewhere.” (emphasis added)

Got that? Democrats, who scream against ‘tax cuts for the rich’ should be thrilled about the elimination of the deduction for state and local taxes. Those types of deductions overwhelmingly benefit the rich Democrats claim to ‘hate’ so much.

GOP tax-bill bottom line? “Even after losing the state and local income tax deduction, taxpayers in New York and other high-tax blue states would still end up ahead under the Republican tax reform bill, analysts say.” (underline, bold emphasis added)

Funny…Democrats and media aren’t telling anyone that…

What’s more insulting to Democrat constituents – the fact their leaders will try to dupe them with lies…or that their leaders see them as stupid enough to believe the lies?

Those climbing on the ‘no reason to not believe’ Roy Moore’s accusers are simply trying to stay within the suddenly-found politically correct boundaries for sex-assault accusers.

(We say ‘suddenly-found’, ‘cuz when it was Bill-the-Zipper Clinton or Ted-the-Senate-Lion Kennedy in the sex-assault hot-seat you know how the ladies were treated then. Remember, MoveOn.org was an effort to stop everyone from focusing on Bill Clinton’s escapades, enabled with complete and total cooperation by the Left-wing media.)

Anyway, those who have ‘no reason to not believe’ the women accusing Roy Moore now – based on the same standard – have no reason to ‘not believe’ Roy Moore either.

All depends on how the question is phrased…doesn’t it?

(Keep in mind none of the women accusing Moore have signed under-oath accusations, preferring to stay in the television’s focus rather than seek serious legal assistance.)

Now…when the burden-of-proof scenario begins, let’s see how the accusers fare.

Hillary Clinton-&-Co provably took millions of dollars from Russians while in office, Joe Biden took hundreds of thousands from federal agencies for rent of property, yet the President is hammered for his private-owned businesses charging reasonable fees, and hammered – with no authentication – for colluding with Russia?

Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd, all committed provable sexual assault against women…but the Right (e.g. Mr. Trump, Roy Moore) are hammered for sexual misconduct (and, we should note, without evidence or any proof) relentlessly?

Obama provably weaponized federal agencies (from the FBI to the IRS) against the Republicans, but President Trump is hammered for misuse and abuse of power?

Mueller, Comey, et al committed multiple acts of cover-up while in appointed office, yet Jeff Sessions is hammered over conflicts of interest and acts of impropriety?

When will the Right start defending itself, and hammering back?

What’s the use of a Justice System…when they refuse to administer justice?

The Clinton Foundation took in some $145 million during the UraniumOne fiasco, and God knows how much since; Trump’s been given nada…yet he gets investigated.

How much more time will we give this investigation travesty? The longer this ridiculous episode endures, the more evidence of Democrat chicanery will disappear.

We’ve said it before, we’ll say it again – Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, Holder, Clinton, and Obama were elbow-deep in the UraniumOne underhanded dealings…

…it’s our strong belief the real cause for Mueller’s appointment was to eliminate any evidence of wrong-doing during the Obama years, to cover-up Democrat duplicity.

And, we’re talking all the way up to Barack Obama.

(It’s inconceivable to think Obama wouldn’t have received some of the millions flowing in from the Russians…after all, he demonstrated an incredible ‘flexibility’ to turn a blind eye to Hillary violating agreements not to take foreign emoluments while in office.)

Incredibly, congressional Democrats have filed impeachment charges against Donald Trump for taking emoluments…as if Clinton’s $145 million dollar payday doesn’t exist.

Republicans better understand Democrats will never give up on their attacks. The only way to beat them back is to play the same game of hard-ball…relentlessly.

We can only hope the Dept of Justice is quietly investigating these shenanigans.

Surprise – House Democrats display another shocking example of raw hypocrisy.

Hammering on Attorney Gen’t Sessions, Rep Conyers (D) asked “In a functioning democracy, is it common for the leader of the country to order the criminal justice system to retaliate against his political opponents?” (Sessions predictably said ‘no’.)

The AG  should have said – ‘WELL, IT WAS COMMON FOR OBAMA TO DO IT.’

(Recent discoveries have exposed Obama’s  8 years of weaponizing federal agencies, from the FBI, CIA, and NSA to the IRS and ATF, in his attack against Republicans.)

Conyers was trying to establish a false premise to inoculate Hillary Clinton from any of her actions, falsely asserting any investigation would be political retaliation against an opponent, when the truth is many of her activities during and after office are suspect.

More House Democrats piled on that false premise, but facts are stubborn…especially when evidence shows Hillary’s cozy relationships insulated her from prosecution.

As Gregg Jarrett succinctly points out “This is not retaliation, as Conyers would have people believe, but the enforcement of laws unimpeded by political motivations. Clinton is not exempt merely because she ran for the presidency and lost.” (emphasis added)

Some argue that a special counsel is not required, but the attorney general vowed to recuse himself from Clinton inquiries, re emails/Foundation…so we’ll see.

Bottom line – new revelations on Comey’s questionable conduct during the email probe and $145 million dollars pouring into the Foundation during her official secretary of state reign (with Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein et al elbow deep) beg the question…

…was the AG’s vow based only on the facts as they existed at that time, or…

…does the Sessions ‘vow-to-recuse’ pertain, if new inculpatory evidence is in play?

As for Democrats’ decrying the President directing federal law enforcement agencies, their sad lack of knowledge, vis-a-vis, anything Constitutional, is pathetic. Somebody needs to take their hand, lead them gently off into a corner…

…and tell them “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed“ means what it says.

Finally – Message to Republicans:

Stop letting Democrats ‘set the table’ on important issues with false premises.

For all the anti- and never-Trumpers warn of dark times, loss of freedoms, authoritarian dictatorships, and fascist activities to mushroom…no examples are yet to be seen.

What we have seen from Mr. Trump, quite clearly, is summed up by Roger Kimball, who also has become disillusioned with everyone…and everything…anti-Trump:

“By the time his first term is out, Trump will have remade the judiciary as he promised he would, in the image of Antonin Scalia, that is to say after the fashion envisioned by the Founders…But just think about these subjects: illegal immigration (down by more the 60 percent), energy (America is now the world’s biggest producer of energy), unemployment (4 and a bit percent), growth (3 percent for two quarters running), the market (up more than 5,000 points since November 2016), regulation (huge progress in turning back the counterproductive regulatory environment that has stymied American business), consumer confidence (the highest it’s been in a generation), the military (revitalized), taxes (a bracing if imperfect plan wending its way through Congress), Iran (declining to recertify a deal that paved the way for Iran to become a nuclear power). Et, need I say, cetera. (bold emphasis added)

And beyond the raft of particular accomplishments, Trump has also articulated some important larger principles. In Riyadh, he rallied large parts of the Arab world against Islamic terrorism. At Warsaw, he underscored the importance of defending the values of Western civilization—values that include cultural as well as political values. Before the United Nations, he defended the value of national sovereignty as the most reliable guarantor of liberty. Just a few days ago in South Korea, he reminded the world that when it came to defending America’s interests, his administration had committed itself to policies very different from the accommodationist policies of past administrations.“

So, the question remains…why the continued anti/never-Trump hostility?

What would the Democrat-Left say if they learned BlueCollar has been advised by multiple sources that Democrat Senator Jon Tester sexually harassed young girls?

Or Democrat Senators Joe Manchin and Bill Nelson?

Or that Democrat Senator Heidi Hetkamp had sexually harassed young boys?

Never mind the fact that there’s no evidence or any type of proof…is this enough to call for the senators to step down, or be voted out of office in 2018 mid-term elections?

Has Ohio Democrat Senator Sherrod Brown stopped physically assaulting ex-wives? Is there any reason why he shouldn’t be subjected to the same scrutiny as a Republican?

After all, a la Roy Moore, by Democrat-Left standards, it’s the seriousness of the charge that’s involved, not whether there’s anything like proof (or absence thereof)…right?

Would the Left be so quick to condemn Democrat Senators accused of sexism? Or, do you think maybe…just maybe…retaining Senate seats would be a ‘tad’ more important?

(We should note, at this point, we can’t assert to the validity of the above charges.)

But that’s not the criteria in play here…

You see, it doesn’t matter how long ago (or even IF) it happened…for Democrats and the Left-wing media, if it’s a Republican and they can gain Senate seats…it’s a GO.

But…TURN-ABOUT IS FAIR PLAY.

What say you, Senators…ready for the same treatment?

Odd, how no one on the Left decries the fact 3 young black men on a UCLA basketball team, caught and jailed in China for shoplifting, had put our President in a tight spot…

…we can’t help but wonder if race had something to do with the Left’s ‘discretion’?

Just as odd…the very same people claiming Trump ‘racist’ don’t give him any credit for coming to their defense, even though they put him in a difficult position during his visit.

After all, if he were racist, that’d be an unassailable reason to let them sit in a China jail.

And the President showed class in not jumping on the issue…again, no admiring news about his restraint, or class act – just a dumbed-down Left-wing media embargo.

Guess we’ve got to write it off to the old Double Standard we’ve come to expect…

Make no mistake – sex-smear allegations against Alabama’s Senate GOP candidate Roy Moore are not meant to get him indicted…it’s to get him de-legitimized.

Burden of proof for all these allegations is squarely on the accuser…what proof has been presented that justifies the smears against Moore, to date? NONE.

As with President Trump, the intent here is to hamstring Moore.

Any Republican politician who supports such obvious tactics should be ashamed of themselves…but then, that’s just the latest shameful act for many in Congress.