‘No reason to disbelieve’ doesn’t mean there’s no burden-of-proof necessary

Those climbing on the ‘no reason to not believe’ Roy Moore’s accusers are simply trying to stay within the suddenly-found politically correct boundaries for sex-assault accusers.

(We say ‘suddenly-found’, ‘cuz when it was Bill-the-Zipper Clinton or Ted-the-Senate-Lion Kennedy in the sex-assault hot-seat you know how the ladies were treated then. Remember, MoveOn.org was an effort to stop everyone from focusing on Bill Clinton’s escapades, enabled with complete and total cooperation by the Left-wing media.)

Anyway, those who have ‘no reason to not believe’ the women accusing Roy Moore now – based on the same standard – have no reason to ‘not believe’ Roy Moore either.

All depends on how the question is phrased…doesn’t it?

(Keep in mind none of the women accusing Moore have signed under-oath accusations, preferring to stay in the television’s focus rather than seek serious legal assistance.)

Now…when the burden-of-proof scenario begins, let’s see how the accusers fare.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *