Romney regrets the emergence of conservative media?

Is Rush Limbaugh right? Would the GOP prefer a permanent minority role, rather than do the really tough work and lead?

Sorry Liberals, claiming that, under Obama’s administration, the gap between wage earnings between men and women has shrunk doesn’t mean his policies are good.

Women’s wages didn’t move higher because they’re earning more. It’s a result of the work force deterioration for women, whose wages no longer affect averages.

Look, low-income jobs are typically first to go, and women have been hit hard in this category. When low-income women lose their jobs, the wage average moves up…

…because jobless women no longer get included in the average!

Example:

110 women earning $1925/hr collectively have an average wage of $17.50/hour. Ten women at the bottom of the wage scale (avg. $8.50/hr) get laid off. The 100 women working earn $1840/hr collectively. The new average for women: $18.40/hr.

Claiming a higher wage rate for women is a good thing while ignoring the cause is more women losing their jobs, is like applauding a lowering unemployment rate because many of the jobless have stopped looking for work and aren’t counted.

(Oohhh, wait…Democrats keep doing that too. Do we detect a trend?)

Read Stephen Moore’s article – he knows what he’s talking about.

Declining take-home pay and employment, a faster rise in poverty among women; the sad results of an Obama administration effect on working class women.

From job-killer tax policies to over-regulation, Obamacare to massive trillion $ debt, the last 6-1/2 years of Obama-nomics have devastated working class women.

Single women with children are especially hard hit – add up the above statistics with the high cost of electricity and gas-pump prices caused by Democrat energy policy.

The numbers are staggering…and back-breaking.

So, ladies, when Hillary says ‘vote for me ‘cuz I am a woman’…remind yourself…

…first and foremost, she’s a Democrat.

Then, ask yourself and the ladies around you…

‘4 MORE YEARS OF THIS?’

You..get..what..you..vote..for.

Anyone who needs proof that winning arguments doesn’t mean winning the War of Ideas need look no further than California, or Hillary’s Benghazi hearing aftermath.

California is the poster-child of inequality, due to one-party Democrat control.

As Victor Davis Hanson notes: “…a third of America’s welfare recipients reside in California, one quarter of the population lives below the poverty line, (yet) nowhere in America are there more billionaires.” But this 1-party state remains Democrat.

Why? Bad policy is veiled by a Liberal-leaning media, while inequality reigns.

Hillary Clinton is the poster-child of lying/calculating politicians.

Once again demonstrating that dubious distinction, in her testimony during a House Benghazi hearing she provably lied under oath…while blaming the death of Ambassador Stevens, Woods, Doherty, and Smith…on Ambassador Stevens!

Yet, by Liberal media standards, Hillary emerged ‘unscathed’ and ‘victorious’.

Message?

Clearly, the facts show Democrat policies fail…Democrat politicians lie/evade. But winning the argument means nothing if Liberal media controls the messaging.

Republicans need to understand this, and step up their game.

It may be too late for California, but not necessarily for America.

Being a successful Democrat is defined as calmly sitting before a congressional hearing and lying with impunity even as the lies are exposed, not batting an eye.

What does it say about a political Party, that Hillary Clinton is the best they can do?

What does it say about a media that champions such low-life?

For those who missed it, the Senate held hearings on high incarceration problems, in conjunction with discussions on the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act.

Obama and the Democrat cohort have pushed a ‘racist’ narrative on incarceration rates, blaming an aggressive war on drugs unfairly targeting the black community.

They would have you believe harmless pot-heads clog up the prison system.

But that’s not true, says an expert on law enforcement and criminal justice.

Statistically, violent crime is the driving factor. The pull quote: “Since 1999, violent offenders have accounted for all the increase in the national prison census.”

Facts are a stubborn thing…trust Democrats trolling for votes to ignore them at will.

The article about Ms. MacDonald’s testimony is concise, and factual; give it a read.

An hour or so into the House Benghazi hearing, Clinton asserted “there was no credible threat known to our intelligence community” the morning of September 11, 2012.

But as the Washington Times reported Monday “The lack of preparation and resources persisted, even as CIA produced more than four dozen pieces of confirmed intelligence that reported on increasing threats against Americans and Westerners in Benghazi and documented more than 20 attempted attacks in the area just before the fiery assault on the compound on Sept. 11.”

Further, the morning of the day he died Amb. Stevens cabled Clinton on his concerns.

(Ironically, only minutes into her opening statement, Hillary Clinton declared that “nobody knew the dangers of Libya better” than Amb. Chris Stevens. H-E-L-L-O?)

Finally, this last May watchdog group Judicial Watch reported the Obama Administration knew “Al-Qaeda terrorists had planned the Benghazi attack 10 days in advance”.

If the DIA made that assertion the morning after the attack, they knew beforehand.

So how did Judicial Watch find out? From State and Defense Department documents forced in disclosure as a result of a Freedom-of-Information-Act court order.

‘No credible threat’? Sure…and al-Qaeda’s still on the run, right Hillary?

In her closing sentence before the House hearing commenced, Hillary said “Let’s be worthy of the trust the American people have bestowed upon us…”

…she just ‘forgot’ to mention it takes a court order for some politicians to do so.

Democrats can spin the ‘Hillary was in command’ meme as long as they want, but facts are very stubborn things…and are (ever too slowly) becoming a matter of public record.

What’s obvious is that Hillary Clinton will be a ‘credible threat’ to any American…

…whose life is in her hands.

Is this Nation so far adrift it can’t understand how a strong family structure is important?

Just askin’.

“What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Clinton apologists notwithstanding, Libya and Benghazi tell you all you need to know.

As Secretary-of-State, she made a mess of it from the start; failed to protect Americans with tragic results, has lied and stonewalled after…

…and denies all responsibility now.

Representative Jordan, today, confronted Clinton with newly-discovered emails that clearly indicated she knew Benghazi attackers were al-Qaeda, not video-protesters…

…then, told Americans the opposite…because it fit an ‘al-Qaeda on the run’ narrative that the Democrats needed to push, in order for Obama to win re-election that November.

Worse still, Clinton and Obama used the ‘video-protest’ lie to justify their lack of support for the Americans under siege that night! They knew it was an al-Qaeda attack, but refused to provide any military support that might have saved lives.

Libya, & tragically, Benghazi, symbolize Hillary’s foreign policy incompetence…worse, it reveals the depths they’ll sink to…trading American lives to achieve political gain.

Obama’s exposed, and so is Clinton…they left Americans to die at the hands of terrorists.

How can any Democrat suggest she qualifies to be president?

Leave it to a Democrat to offer something useless to voters.

Bernie Sanders wants everyone to get free college, yet the administration just released numbers indicating that available jobs for 6.5 million with degrees don’t exist…

…and won’t THROUGH 2022.

Yeah, yeah, more degree’d graduates for nonexistent jobs…that’s the ticket.