An hour or so into the House Benghazi hearing, Clinton asserted “there was no credible threat known to our intelligence community” the morning of September 11, 2012.

But as the Washington Times reported Monday “The lack of preparation and resources persisted, even as CIA produced more than four dozen pieces of confirmed intelligence that reported on increasing threats against Americans and Westerners in Benghazi and documented more than 20 attempted attacks in the area just before the fiery assault on the compound on Sept. 11.”

Further, the morning of the day he died Amb. Stevens cabled Clinton on his concerns.

(Ironically, only minutes into her opening statement, Hillary Clinton declared that “nobody knew the dangers of Libya better” than Amb. Chris Stevens. H-E-L-L-O?)

Finally, this last May watchdog group Judicial Watch reported the Obama Administration knew “Al-Qaeda terrorists had planned the Benghazi attack 10 days in advance”.

If the DIA made that assertion the morning after the attack, they knew beforehand.

So how did Judicial Watch find out? From State and Defense Department documents forced in disclosure as a result of a Freedom-of-Information-Act court order.

‘No credible threat’? Sure…and al-Qaeda’s still on the run, right Hillary?

In her closing sentence before the House hearing commenced, Hillary said “Let’s be worthy of the trust the American people have bestowed upon us…”

…she just ‘forgot’ to mention it takes a court order for some politicians to do so.

Democrats can spin the ‘Hillary was in command’ meme as long as they want, but facts are very stubborn things…and are (ever too slowly) becoming a matter of public record.

What’s obvious is that Hillary Clinton will be a ‘credible threat’ to any American…

…whose life is in her hands.