Winning an argument doesn’t mean winning the ‘War of Ideas’

Anyone who needs proof that winning arguments doesn’t mean winning the War of Ideas need look no further than California, or Hillary’s Benghazi hearing aftermath.

California is the poster-child of inequality, due to one-party Democrat control.

As Victor Davis Hanson notes: “…a third of America’s welfare recipients reside in California, one quarter of the population lives below the poverty line, (yet) nowhere in America are there more billionaires.” But this 1-party state remains Democrat.

Why? Bad policy is veiled by a Liberal-leaning media, while inequality reigns.

Hillary Clinton is the poster-child of lying/calculating politicians.

Once again demonstrating that dubious distinction, in her testimony during a House Benghazi hearing she provably lied under oath…while blaming the death of Ambassador Stevens, Woods, Doherty, and Smith…on Ambassador Stevens!

Yet, by Liberal media standards, Hillary emerged ‘unscathed’ and ‘victorious’.

Message?

Clearly, the facts show Democrat policies fail…Democrat politicians lie/evade. But winning the argument means nothing if Liberal media controls the messaging.

Republicans need to understand this, and step up their game.

It may be too late for California, but not necessarily for America.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *