Recognizing an ally’s capital is a no-brainer

It’s about time an American president had the nerve to do what needed to be done.

Israel is our ally. Jerusalem is the capital of Israel…

  • failure to acknowledge that basic fact leaves Israel as less than a nation;
  • failure to acknowledge that basic fact encourages the anti-Israel Muslim sentiment to more dangerous acts of violence.

Thank you for having the courage to do the right thing, Mr. President.

Imploding special counsel probe bringing down…nothing but Democrats?

Latest revelations make the entire ‘collusion’ probe look like a partisan hit

Democrats used a phony sleaze-doc to push a Russia collusion probe that, if anything,  has done a fine job…exposing Democrats – from lackeys to lawyers to leaders.

Pay-to-Play UraniumOne; FBI email NON-probe; DNC aide chicanery; Fake News hit jobs; partisan FBI-lying bias; what’s next? The whole thing’s blown up in their face.

Unintended consequences? Or, self-immolation – writ…LARGE?

With every new story about UraniumOne deal, the more it seems likely destroying evidence is a high priority for Democrats

With every new story about a crooked UraniumOne deal, it becomes increasingly clear that a main objective for Democrats is ensuring evidence goes down the memory hole.

We know many are convinced Mueller’s special counsel probe is all about impeaching or otherwise delegitimizing President Trump, but the scope of UraniumOne is huge…

…and a great many Democrats are potentially at risk.

The special counsel Russia probe keeps Mueller in a position where access to that data is possible, and as FBI director he was a principle in the investigations at that time.

That’s why we’ve been saying for a long time now that, in our opinion, this is also about dumping evidence…’cuz key Democrat leadership was in peril with Trump’s election.

Primary players in the FBI – Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, and McCabe – as well as AG Holder and Lynch, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama were all at risk. Had Hillary been elected, no doubt hard evidence would’ve gone down the memory hole, but now…?

Who’s watching the watchers?

ThugFL deal with take-a-knee players funded by take-aways from existing REAL issues

Reports say the deal the NFL tried to pitch to the thugs in the league would be funded by taking funds away from existing breast-cancer awareness and military issues.

That’s right – thug players, backed by Leftie George Soros as they protest bogus issues of imaginary injustices, would result in the NFL alienating women’s and military groups.

Proving, once again, how tone-deaf NFL management really is.

Enlightening those who already know, trying to wake those pretending to sleep

And the question is – what’s more maddening…

…enlightening those who already know, or trying to wake those pretending to sleep?

As Ed Rogers notes in his Washington Post op-ed “The quest for collusion is over as the desperate shriek for impeachment begins”…

…”The Democrats know their faux-outrage over collusion is hollow and spent. Given that Mueller’s investigation hasn’t found the holy grail or produced anything that rises to the level of criminality on the part of Trump, liberals in Congress and in the media are now transitioning to an obstruction of justice story-line.”

They want him impeached for firing Comey…

…but it’s within his constitutional authority to do so.

Or, they want him impeached for pressuring Comey to ease up on Flynn even though Trump knew Flynn lied to the FBI…

…but he didn’t know, the acting attorney general confirmed the White House wasn’t told about how Flynn’s FBI interview went…and Comey says he wasn’t pressured.

(Frustrating to be a Democrat-Leftie nowadays, isn’t it?)

Bottom line, all else fails – they want Trump impeached…because he’s Trump.

Good luck finding a basis for that in the Constitution.

So far, Mueller’s spent $7 million of tax-payer money on a collusion meme the Leftknew was bogus, and they now push to spend more for obstruction – where none occurred.

How long will tax-payers put up with this blatant, unnecessarily costly derangement?

(UPDATED) How far down an obstruction rabbit-hole will these idiots go?

Those aflutter over the weekend Trump tweet that he fired Flynn “because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI” are trying to make the obstruction case that, if Trump asked Comey to not prosecute Flynn (knowing he’d lied to the FBI) that’s the smoking gun.

Seriously?

According to a report, the President spoke about this with Comey on Jan 27th, three days after Flynn’s FBI interview. But Andy McCarthy notes the acting attorney general, Yates, declined to tell White House counsel how that interview with Flynn went.

And she’s on record – she testified to that during a Senate subcommittee meeting.

Now, top that off with Comey admitting during congressional testimony that 1) he didn’t feel pressured, and 2) CNN reported “FBI interviewers believed Flynn was cooperative and provided truthful answers” during the interview.” 

Not exactly ‘obstruction’ stuff, people.

What’s most amazing here is how far Democrats and their Left-wing media masters will go down a rabbit hole, trying to make something out of nothing against Republicans…

…yet fail to get even a tad worked up over a proven liar to the FBI and Congress when it comes to Hillary. Impeachment’s in order – but the only provable obstruction to date…

…is none other than a Democrat crime.

How far down the ‘obstruction’ rabbit hole will these idiots go?

Those aflutter over the weekend Trump tweet that he fired Flynn “because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI” are trying to make the obstruction case that, if Trump asked Comey to not prosecute Flynn (knowing he’d lied to the FBI) that’s the smoking gun.

Seriously?

According to a report, the President spoke about this with Comey on January 24th27th, the same day Flynn was testifying to the FBI. But Andy McCarthy notes acting attorney general Yates declined to tell White House counsel how that interview with Flynn went.

(Correction: one report said the 24th, but other reports show the 27th. We had linked to the properly dated reports, but based the incorrect segments of this blog on an incorrect report. We apologize for the confusion.)

And she’s on record – she testified to that during a Senate subcommittee meeting.

So, if President Trump spoke to Comey the same day Flynn was testifying to the FBI, he couldn’t have known Flynn lied to the FBI during that interview. (Correction: the Flynn-FBI interview was held Jan 24th – we apologize for the error)

Now, top that off with Comey admitting during congressional testimony that 1) he didn’t feel pressured, and 2) the Wall St Journal and CNN reports “FBI interviewers believed Flynn was cooperative and provided truthful answers” during the interview.” 

Not exactly ‘obstruction’ stuff, people.

What’s most amazing here is how far Democrats and their Left-wing media masters will go down a rabbit hole, trying to make something out of nothing against Republicans…

…yet fail to get even a tad worked up over a proven liar to the FBI and Congress when it comes to Hillary. Impeachment’s in order – but the only provable obstruction to date…

…is none other than a Democrat crime.

(Updated, with corrections)

Why look at tax-reform as a zero-sum issue?

Those claiming the financial growth from tax-reform as not enough to ‘pay for’ tax cuts should be required to answer several very relevant questions…

  • why aren’t spending-cuts ever thought of as part of the solution?
  • why ignore the possible continuing legislative process as part of the solution?

Spending has been out of control for a long time, but those who oppose tax-cuts never think the need to rein in spending is part of the answer. And they always object as if there’s no possibility of further legislation that can tweak tax codes along the way.

They treat any solution Republicans advance as zero-sum losing propositions by low-balling revenue benefits (intentionally) and ignoring spending-cut alternatives completely, which is a  deliberate dishonesty FakeNews media helps them perpetuate.