‘Experts’ need to spend less energy on ‘what was’, and more energy on (finally) lawfully dealing with ‘what is’

Enough with speculation on motivations behind what has been identified and proven to be illegal activities of the Party that was in power…spying on the Party coming to power.

Motives are either altruistic or selfish – in cases of unlawful activities, courts are there to decide which is which, when it’s evident that laws were broken…and who broke them.

Crimes aren’t based on what we think, they’re based on what can be proven.

So, let’s end the ‘what-if-&-why’ games, and move on with the legal process.

Attorney General Sessions – DO.YOUR.JOB.

PERIOD.

FULL.STOP.

Douglas MacKinnon lays it out for us in an IBD op-ed today…“This Is What A Police State And ‘High Crimes And Misdemeanors’ Really Look Like”

Summary pull quote: “When you collude with foreign espionage agents to manufacture evidence to obtain a warrant to spy on citizens of the United States for purely political and ideological reasons, you are not only breaking the laws of the United States, but are introducing those very questions of treason, bribery and high crimes and misdemeanors into the conversation.” (bold emphasis added)

What the hell are they waiting for?

Trying to snare Comey over lies about meeting w-Obama serves no purpose

As the conservative news organizations go viral trying to paint former FBI Dir Comey a liar over the recent discovery that Comey met with Obama Jan 05, 2017, it would be wise to read very carefully his June 08, 2017 testimony (in question) to the Senate…

…because what he said in specific is very important to the question of perjury.

“I spoke alone with President Obama twice in person (and never on the phone) – once in 2015 to discuss law enforcement policy issues and a second time, briefly, for him to say goodbye in late 2016…” (bold emphasis added, to identify a qualifier)

The just-discovered meeting Comey had w-Obama on Jan 05 included other attendees.

Call him sneaky and misleading, but that Senate testimony doesn’t qualify him a liar.

There’s enough hypocrisy, lying, and double-dealing going on without having to try to paint this partisan hack Comey into an ever-shrinking corner – we don’t need this.

Too big to JAIL…?

With the ongoing discovery of one illegality after another, the question needs asking…

…will Justice be served, or are these criminal Democrats too big to jail?

Victor Davis Hanson, ever the optimist, thinks Justice will be done.

He thinks the tipping point will be if Trump nears the magic 50% popularity rating, and in that eventuality, the Democrats will back off the Trump-Russia thing and try to recoup before this years midterm elections; if so, the Democrats may have waited too long.

If Mr. Hanson’s speculation is on target, they have a big problem, because the usual polling Democrats key off are massaged numbers, used to drive opinion.

So, we would submit to you that given the President’s REAL poll numbers which would normally be 10-15 points higher without the FakeNews media influence, Trump is over that magic point…has been for a while now…and will only get better by November.

And, if Democrats stall or lose ground in the midterm elections, the message is clear…

Americans are tired of deceitJustice MUST be done.

Victor Davis Hanson lists the various Democrat chicanery: “The wrongdoing probably includes attempting to warp a U.S. election, Russian collusion, repeatedly misleading and lying before the FISA courts, improperly surveilling American citizens, unmasking the names of citizens swept up in unlawful surveillance and then illegally leaking them to the press, disseminating and authenticating opposition smears during a political campaign, lying under oath to Congress, obstructing ongoing investigations, using federal funds to purchase ad hominem gossip against a presidential candidate, blatant conflicts of interests, weaponizing federal investigations, trafficking in and leaking classified information… The list goes on…”

(bold emphases added)

Yeah – Justice MUST be done.

Put the spotlight on deceit – make Congress responsible for ok’ing release of Dem memo that hurts nat’l security

After reading several articles on the advantages and disadvantages of the President’s redacting the memo Democrats deceitfully mined with classified intelligence (so they can falsely scream ‘cover-up’ afterwards), we have revised our opinion on the matter.

President Trump should redact highly sensitive intelligence data from the memo, then send it back to Congress, for them to decide whether to release it…or the original.

The fact that political appointees in the FBI-DOJ hierarchy abused FISA standards by using an opposition research dirt-dossier, without properly noting it was, is irrefutable.

Democrats can only try deflection – either by claiming the source (Steele) was reliable, the subject of the FISA warrant (Page) was disreputable, or attacking GOP Rep Nunes.

Which in no way detracts from the fact the FISA process was deliberately abused by submitting a political opposition research document that failed to note its origins.

And, if the Congress is so politicized they will release an unredacted version of a deceit-memo from Democrats that jeopardizes nat’l security, that’s a whole different animal.

President did the right thing throwing the Democrat ‘memo’ back at them

When it comes to avoiding landmines, no one does it better than Mr. Trump.

House Intel Committee Democrats released a ‘memo’, supposedly in rebuttal of a GOP memo that shows Obama’s administration abused the FISA process to spy on Trump.

The Democrat memo was intentionally left full of sensitive information that would have to be redacted due to its nature – as soon as the Republicans did that, the landmine of ‘cover-up’ outrage Democrats would explode would’ve taken all the oxygen in the room.

But, this ain’t Mr. Trump’s first walk through a minefield. He knew the game, knew the players, and so he threw the memo back at them and told them to ‘do it right’…

then tweeted “The Democrats sent a very political and long response memo which they knew, because of sources and methods (and more), would have to be heavily redacted, whereupon they would blame the White House for lack of transparency. Told them to re-do and send back in proper form!” (emphases added)

Well done, Mr. President.

And, if these Democrats on the House INTELLIGENCE Committee don’t understand a need to keep sensitive intelligence information secret, after all this time…

…we question what they’re doing on that committee…or in Congress?

(And, by the way folks, let’s recognize once again that, absent the President’s tweet, his reasons for sending the ‘memo’ back to be done right would have gone unreported. So those who complain about his tweets may want to re-think their objections…otherwise, it’s tantamount to admitting they would prefer media blackouts, rather than truth.)

Glaring dishonesty of Obama’s Justice Dept in getting FISA warrants justify criminal action vs those involved

So…they trusted dirt-dossier author Steele until they had to fire him for lying…but then trusted him enough to hide his unreliability and firing during the FISA renewal process?

3 times…AFTER Steele was fired?

Andy McCarthy lays it out in a concise, damning style.

“In late October 2016, shortly after the first warrant was issued, the FBI terminated its relationship with Steele because he lied to the Bureau about his contacts with the media. But the Justice Department did not report this to the FISA court. Instead, when the first warrant expired in January 2017, the FBI and Justice Department sought its renewal by, again, relying on the credibility of the guy they’d booted for lying.”

“But that was not the half of it. Steele’s agreement with the FBI was that he would not communicate with the press. He made that agreement and then communicated with the press anyway — which showed he was unreliable, notwithstanding the FBI’s continued insistence to the contrary. He hadn’t just flouted the agreement by speaking to the press, though; he had clearly lied about doing so.” (all emphases added)

Yeah – the FBI and Justice Dept people involved in this fiasco need to be in jail.

But even though it was run by Obama, in a Chicago-thuggish fashion, don’t expect any of this to rub off on the Anointed One, after all…he’s the FIRST BLACK President.

His legacy will be that of the most weaponized gov’t in U.S. history, but he’s The One

…and therefore…untouchable.

A major question still needing an answer? Was the FISA court the 4-time unwitting dupe of a deceitful Dept of Justice and FBI…or a willing co-conspirator to their illegal acts?

Convene a Grand Jury, and let the indictments flow.

Considering nat’l security breaches House Dems have caused, a ‘wall’ is definitely a good thing

“House Intel committee infighting so fierce, wall could soon divide staff”

They’re talking about a physical wall, because of the FISA-gate issue, but considering the leaks by Democrats, and their miserable failure exposed last year from hiring totally unqualified Pakistani aide Amri Awan and his cohort, a digital wall would be advised.

Those Pakistani aides illegally accessed thousands of House Democrat Intel emails and we’re still waiting to find out how seriously that intelligence failure will hit America.

What with Schiff’s loose lips…and Democrats’ lousy hiring practices in general…

…we suggest the House Intel walls get built BEFORE the President’s border wall.

WAY BEFORE.

Faster…please.