Profiles in…DECEIT

The House committee investigating abuses of our legal system has voted to release the memo documenting those abuses, and, surprise, Democrats voted against the release.

The reason is simple…the abuses were committed by Obama and his Democrat cohort.

Since the special counsel was appointed to investigate a bogus Trump-Russia collusion narrative, BlueCollar has maintained its real purpose was to hide/destroy evidence of chicanery and abuses – some claim potentially criminal – committed by Obama-&-Co.

It’s been a frantic hysterical smokescreen, to deflect/obscure what transpired, but even herculean efforts of a duplicitous media can’t cover up this pile of Democrat excrement.

Victor Davis Hanson provides a definitive list of the Left’s chicanery.

His article explains what BlueCollar has posted for months – Democrats expected to win so they had no problem going to extraordinary illegal lengths to support Hillary.

And, it’s summarized brilliantly in his headline and sub-headline…

Hillary’s ‘Sure’ Victory Explains Most Everything…Stretching or breaking the law on her behalf would have been rewarded by a President Clinton.” (emphasis added)

The only point we disagree with Mr. Hanson over is why so many went to extraordinary effort to help a ‘guaranteed victorious’ Hillary. He asserts it was to humiliate Trump…

…but we see more self-serving motivations. It’s obvious these partisan ne’er-do-wells are prime examples of an ‘all-about-me’ mentality. They’re seekers of favor and status.

But now, they’re scurrying for the dark corners.

So, release the memo of abuses – let the American people see how Democrats work.

Let the sunshine in.

There are liars, damn liars…and then there’s Eric Holder…

Talk about lame: former U.S. attorney general Eric Holder has just come out in defense of just-resigned (and soon-to-be-disgraced) FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe.

And, while doing so, flat out LIED about the special counsel probe, calling it a ‘criminal investigation’ when all along it’s been portrayed as an intell investigation to work around the pesky criteria requirement that justifying a special counsel demands citing a crime.

Referring to ‘bogus’ attacks against the FBI, Holder lies by citing a false investigation context. The only thing bogus here is Eric Holder. There is no CRIMINAL investigation.

There never has been, and never will be –  ‘cuz there was no crime committed.

Holder’s a pathetic example of what the Left hails as top legal leadership.

He’s a partisan joke…and a liar. Always has been, always will be.

And, of course, always lurking behind these partisan liars are the media masters willing to push a subtle lie – such as a ‘criminal’ investigation exists where there’s…nothing.

This is how they do it. This is FakeNews at it’s most innuendoed, vile worst.

Insidious doesn’t begin to describe their deceit.

The corporate tax-cuts mean a great deal to America’s small businesses

There are, and will be once again, great examples of how a larger corporation provides job opportunities over a wide variety of small businesses throughout America.

Democrats relentlessly attack Republicans for favoring corporate legislation that makes the gears in our great American machine hum, but business drives a Nation toward the goals that create opportunities, and improve the lives of millions directly and indirectly.

The corporate elites at Davos gave the President a rock-star welcome, for good reason.

First and foremost, American growth creates global growth.

Then, if government gets out of the way and lets businesses compete with favorable terms FOR ALL, it unleashes the greatest, best trained, most technologically capable and innovative dynamics in our work-force…unparalleled in the world today.

Stated bluntly, Democrat politicians LIE when saying low corporate tax rates are a bad idea. They lie because their policies favor targeted huge corporations, that, in turn, shower politicians with big cash donations to keep their unfair, most-favored status.

Here’s a first-hand look at how symbiotic relationships with corporations work:

Fifteen years ago, as part of an economic burst of corporate growth, we witnessed the wide-spread benefit it spawned with job opportunities throughout the private sector. A huge U.S. corporation partnered with a European powerhouse that built gas-powered turbines for energy production, competing with coal-powered facilities for market share.

A small local So-Cal corporation specializing in high-tech machining captured a large contract to machine the cooling jackets those gas-powered generators needed. At the time, the small business was struggling to keep its doors open, and this was a big deal.

The contract meant around the clock shifts; the business actually had to go out and hire more people. Specialty metal sheets would need to be machined; that metal had to be made, cut to size, packaged, warehoused, and ultimately transported for machining.

After machining, the fabricated parts needed to be plated. A metals finishing company provided that service locally. Workers were needed to pre-clean parts, prep and plate  them, inspected after, and packaged to protect that finish during return transport.

The contracting corporation bonded components together, final machining was done, a local area business provided non-destructive leak testing, requiring materials handling personnel, more inspection services, administrative documentation, and transport.

Hundreds of permanent jobs were locally created, just for this one annual contract.

So, the next time you hear someone sneer at lowering U.S. corporate rates, suggest to them that they need to hear what global leaders in Davos are planning

“In a stunning moment, one by one, European titans of industry from companies like Adidas, Siemens and Bayer went around the table to thank Trump for the passage of tax cuts and the easing of corporate tax burdens. Almost every CEO had a new US-based investment or strategic business to announce.” (emphasis added)

And guess what?

“The president of Seimens, Joe Kaeser, said, “since you have been so successful in tax reform we…decided to develop…next generation gas turbines in the United States.””

We know a southern California specialty machining company that will be glad to hear it.

An uproar over ‘1.8mn pathway to citizenship’ offer by Trump is premature

Washington Times headline today…“Trump offers to triple Obama’s amnesty number in exchange for tougher security laws” and the talking heads assume the number has just jumped from 600k+ to over 1.8 million illegals gaining citizenship.

And, right on cue, the never-Trump’ers on the Right begin with their ‘See, I told you so’ narrative, in an effort to – once again – prove they’ve been right about their opposition.

But any true Trump-supporting Republican filters such news as the above headline with a trust that he will only accept a criteria for legalizing those who benefit America.

‘Make America Great Again’ colors every decision he’s made. His proposal to allow a greater number access to legal status means they must actually pass his criteria.

Agreeing to a legal status pathway, on his terms, is no threat to his original vows.

Message to never-Trump’ers…take some deep, cleansing breaths.

Is it ‘anger’…or fear…that has DOJ-FBI deepstaters in a hissy-fit over summary memo of abuses?

After months of stonewalling, the Dept of Justice and FBI turned over documents that could be a huge embarrassment, maybe even with legal overtones, for the deepstate.

Republicans created a 4-page ‘summary’ memo from the information provided.

News that DOJ-FBI leadership is ‘angry’ the memo isn’t available to them is inevitable (and ludicrous, considering Democrat congressman probably leaked it by now).

But, how can anyone be angry over not seeing a summary of info they have?

So, now, there’s accusations of ‘partisan attacks’, by the Left and its media masters.

It’s all much ado about…something.

Because, make no mistake – when Democrats attack someone or something with the viciousness they’re addressing towards the GOP memo, that shows what they fear.

DOJ-FBI partisan hacks aren’t angry – they’re scared.

We believe, with good reason.

Do people know February is Black History month ‘cuz it’s Abe Lincoln’s birth month?

Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president. The Republican Party was started based on an anti-slavery platform…and is the reason this Nation’s slaves were freed.

Abe’s birth month is February…that’s why the month is chosen as Black History month.

The irony? The Party opposed to freeing slaves gets black Americans’ support.

So much for our American education system.

If he chooses to talk to Mueller, do it on live TV, and demand his resignation

Our opinion stands: Trump shouldn’t talk to Mueller, but if he does, do it live.

Lay out the LEGAL reasons this special counsel should be dismissed, lay out the many instances of Mueller’s involvement in the chicanery, and why he should resign…

IF Mueller believes himself to be an honorable man.

In light of the preponderance of information, re, Democrat chicanery, that’s surfaced as a result of the Russia kerfuffle to date, the President could ask Mueller to explain…

  • why Democrats PROVEN to have colluded with Russia are not under scrutiny;
  • why Obama’s DOJ officials and FBI guilty of obstruction are not under scrutiny;
  • why Comey and AG Lynch’s collusion to exonerate Hillary are not under scrutiny;
  • why Obama and Clinton’s weaponizing of intel agencies  are not under scrutiny;
  • why Mueller’s boss Rosenstein, exposed as a co-conspirator, isn’t under scrutiny;
  • and why Mueller, exposed as well, hasn’t done the honorable thing, and resigned.

You know – just for kicks and giggles.

Assuming, of course, that Robert Mueller is really interested in transparency.

Bad faith acts don’t justify Pres Trump talking to Mueller…only 1 reason does

We could go on, but the point is made.

Every item noted above is proven with an abundance of supporting evidence to back up the assertions. Mueller has been exposed as part of the problem, not the solution.

Any honest lawyer would have recused himself after any one of these assertions were made public. Any honest lawyer would acknowledge the premise built on this position is a faulty one, based solely on opposition Party research used to weaponize the DoJ.

There’s not one shred of a reason for President Trump to talk to Mueller…

…unless it’s to ask for HIS resignation.