As the talking heads pontificate over consequences for sexual misconduct, the real question is being overlooked, seemingly in a very deliberate and unsettling manner.

Sure, sexual misconduct is unconscionable…even actionable, in some cases. And the victims of such abuse always deserve to be heard, and given consideration.

But, do those victims have an incontestable status? Is there no need for burden of proof, when lives or careers of those accused are hanging in the balance?

We all know there are always those who would abuse the privilege such an untouchable status would provide – be it for attention, power, glory, money…or spite. (And we’ve all seen that political Parties are not above the use of a smear to gain partisan advantage.)

In today’s heightened partisan scrum, that’s an important fact to remember. During the height of rancor in Bill Clinton’s escapades, a vile Democrat pundit said if you ‘drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.’ And it’s not beyond the pale to believe Democrats may have been trolling trailer-parks of late.

Knowing the chicanery Democrats are capable of, is it wrong to be skeptical?

They’ve weaponized the intelligence agencies against political opponents, fabricated sleaze documents to smear a Presidential candidate…does anyone think they’re not ready to pad the bank accounts of a few women willing to help smear Roy Moore?

We are not to blame for a healthy cynicism that Democrats created through misdeeds.

Having seen the depths that Party will sink to for political advantage, to accuse as being insensitive or callous those who ask for proof from Moore accusers IS beyond the pale.

Yes – those who claim abuse deserve to be heard…as do those they accuse. Any less a standard opens the door for the manipulative, to many levels of mud-slinging tactics.

Who among us is willing to let their lives be smeared, ruined…without challenge?

Chicago was once a great city – and now it’s a place to shun.

The NFL was once a great sport venue – and now it’s been Chicago-ized.

Congratulations, thugs – you’re welcome to both.

As the media’s no-proof-needed lynching of Roy Moore continues apace, it goes without saying the difference between ‘presumed innocent or guilty’ is a (D) or (R).

While many scratch their heads over why so many still support Roy Moore, we’re not surprised…considering growing distrust of the ‘give-a-Democrat-a-pass’ media…

…and the fact it’s the SAME biased media trying to torch Roy Moore now.

Whether the issue is personal, political, or criminal, one standard should be golden…

…burden of proof.

We have several reasons to doubt some of Moore’s accusers (one had a divorce action dismissed when he was the judge, another has a dubious personal history of failure, he wasn’t banned from a mall, the parking lot where activity occurred seems non-existent, and Gloria Allred has a problem with verifying a Roy Moore signature)…

…but we have no reason to doubt other accusers…

…just as we have no reason to doubt Roy Moore.

Burden of proof will provide the reasoning – so bring it on, ladies.

Talk about shooting yourself in the foot…

“Al Franken’s Brother Was USO Tour Photographer When Groping Photo Taken“

Sure – now that they want to tear down a Republican Roy Moore with unfounded (and in some cases possibly fraudulent) sexual misconduct allegations, they’re suddenly ready to talk about (and make noises of condemnation) over Bill Clinton’s misconduct.

Today’s ‘kick Bill Clinton he‘a-culpa-fest’ is just a momentary opportunistic ploy in their continued battle against Republicans…clearing the way so they can stomp Roy Moore into the mud without (as of today) a shred of evidence or proof he did anything wrong.

But Bill-the-Zipper’s decades-old misconduct is not the issue, at this point…unless you look at it in a larger scheme of WHERE THE HELL WAS THE MEDIA for years?

Because, let’s face it – when the temporary faux-angst over turning a blind eye to the Democrat Bigs like Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy ends, and the  ‘hate-all-things-Roy-Moore/Republican’ mushrooms…it’s gonna be blind-eye time again for Democrats.

EVERYONE knew Clinton’s predatory game…

…the Democrat-Left media gave him a pass to PLAY it.

The real culprit here isn’t a pathetic low-life Democrat – it’s his media enablers.

Tone-deaf…? You make the call.

“NFL steps into politics, fights tax cut bill with no stadium bond breaks“

Yeah – they disrespect our flag with ‘racist’ lies about over-aggressive police and an over-oppressive nation, then scream when federal tax-break handouts are cut off.

Who needs the ThugFL?

Some enterprising backers should think about starting a Patriot’s League.

(Otherwise, BlueCollar doesn’t watch professional football.)

“A majority of Hillary Clinton voters say the sexual misconduct accusations against Bill Clinton are “credible,” according to a new poll.“

Of course they say that…now.

They have to – they’re trying to bring down Roy Moore…without a shred of evidence.

Even a Democrat can’t be so hypocritical, when there was solid evidence against Bill ‘the Zipper’…and they gave him a pass for 20 years anyway.

“More than 100,000 convicted felons or other “prohibited persons” tried to buy guns each year during President Barack Obama’s administration by lying on their applications, but the Justice Department only considered prosecuting about 30 to 40 people each year, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.“

Odd behavior, wouldn’t you say, for an anti-gun administration? (emphasis added, btw)

As with the Fast-&-Furious plot to make it easy for American guns to get into the hands of murderous Mexican cartels so they could justify stricter gun control, looks like the Obama team refused to prosecute felons who lied on applications to illegally get guns…

…and the only possible reason why is to enable more gun-violence. We can hear their lament now – ‘We need more gun-control, our system is broken’…and they broke it.

Not a pretty picture…encouraging escalating gun-crimes to help their anti-gun agenda jeopardized American citizens who would be caught in their murderous crossfire.

Did Obama think, if America became Chicago, they could take our guns more easily?

Hard to believe an American president could be so callous.

Ted Kennedy; Chris Dodd; Al Franken; Bill Clinton; Hillary Clinton; Joe Biden; all of them leading Democrats (except the Franken buffoon) who have provably disgraced their political Party, and the political offices they’ve held (or continue to hold).

When will the Congress pass a joint Condemnation Resolution?

Just askin’…

Regardless of their blustering rhetoric, feckless congressional Republicans cannot credibly oppose a tax-cut bill they have the power to improve over time.

This is beyond letting the perfect be the enemy of ‘good enough’ since, with Republican majorities in both the House and the Senate…ANY bill can be improved along the way.

There’s no legitimate reason a GOP politician can oppose serious tax-cut legislation.