Reap what ye budget-cut…

Obama’s administration had cut the budget for preventing domestic bombings nearly in half from where it was under Pres. Bush, according to reporting by the Daily Mail.

So when he and his minions begin the slow dance to blame the sequester for their failure to prevent the Boston Marathon bombings, remember…

…the sequester (begun in March) only cut the growth of FUTURE spending…

…and would have had ZERO effect on such existing programs.

$Billions$ for failed Green Energy programs run by Obama campaign donors…

…but only budget cuts for domestic national security…

…resulting in a paltry $11 million to protect our Nation from domestic bombings.

Such is the world Democrats create.

It’s the ‘act’, not the object…

Charlies-angel comments that even a loaded gun can be benign, which is exactly the point we attempted to make in our previous blog.

It’s an evildoer’s ‘act’ of converting a benign object into deadly force that’s the problem.

And no amount of laws will stop such vermin, intent on committing their evil acts.

No law stopped the Marathon-bomber, or the Sandy Hook shooter.

Resulting laws simply disarm law-abiding citizens, leaving them more vulnerable.

(According to eminent conservative economist and ‘factician’ Thomas Sowell, the Cato Institute estimates approx. 100,000 uses of guns for defensive purposes annually.)

Will Liberals now demand trash-can control…?

A Boston terror act Monday further defines flaws in Liberal-think.

Some 2-legged vermin packed explosives into Boston trashcans, which then detonated among spectators during the Boston Marathon as runners were finishing their race.

This despicable terror act provides a stark argument to gun-control…just as a gun is benign until a bullet is loaded, so a trash can is benign until a bomb is loaded within.

In both cases, it takes an evildoer to convert a benign object into deadly force.

But, by Liberal logic, Mayor Bloomberg & Dems will soon be coming for your trashcans.

There’s logic…and then there’s ‘Liberal logic’…

Caution: adult content -some may be offended (if so, blame HBO)

Some love him, some hate him, some could care less, but there’s one thing that can be said about Bill Maher, HBO comedian and dimwit political pundit…

…every time he opens his mouth, he does manage to demonstrate the complete lack of common sense and disdain for our U.S. Constitution that Liberals are noted for.

His latest HBO rant against the Constitution…’the 2nd Amendment is bullshit’.

Funny that the Liberal Left can (out of thin air) construct, then worship at the altar of, a Constitutional ‘right’ to kill 52 million+ babies in America over 40 years through the gruesome methods of abortion

…but when it comes to a written and clearly enumerated right to keep and bear arms…?

BCP suggests that Maher refer to dictionary.com for the definition of ‘bullshit’, because as a noun or a verb, it sure sounds like it empirically defines his Liberal Left following.

(n) Lies, exaggeration, nonsense…(v) to speak lies, nonsense…”

Yep, that’s Bill Maher…if it wasn’t so despicable, it’d be laughable. Let’s summarize:

(Non-existent) Constitutionally-protected right to kill 52 million babies = OK

(Enumerated) Constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms = bullshit

Brought to you live, on HBO…

 

Proof of hyperventilation on gun control

Need proof that certain politicians and the media are over-hyping gun control?

There’s a viral email going around that answers the question…

Accidental gun deaths per year – 1,500 (FBI statistics).

Accidental medical system deaths per year – 250,000 (HHS Dept statistics).

Perspective?

In our ‘Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein’ blog (March 15), we note that ZERO gun laws have been obeyed by criminals guilty of subsequently committing gun violence.

That being understood then, the only gun deaths any new law could possibly prevent would be of an accidental nature…and if accidental deaths are key…

…why isn’t the media hysterical over Medical accidental deaths?

(And, as for homicides, can someone please explain how gun violence against several kids in a classroom is evil and horrific…but, to Democrats and the media, needle-and-scissor violence against millions of them in a womb is not…?)

Gun-control? Follow the Constitution you swore allegiance to…

Is this Kabuki theatrics or serious dialogue going on in Congress?

Those who advocate gun-control should be allowed to make their argument.

That does not mean they should be allowed to contravene our U.S. Constitution.

We are a nation founded and built on the Rule of Law. The very document which gives us that foundation also gives us the means to amend it democratically.

That said, any law Congress proposes must adhere to Constitutional principle, because every elected member of Congress took an oath to uphold that document.

Our U.S. Constitution makes the election process that puts Congressional members in office possible. To rely on the document in order to achieve high office, then shred that same document at will once in office, is the height of hypocrisy, bad faith, and fraud.

So the question remains: Are we witnessing Grand Kabuki or serious dialogue?

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Open message to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi – fish or cut bait!

Present your legislation to change the 2nd Amendment, and follow the process.

To legislate otherwise violates your Oath of Office, and constitutes fraud…

…a crime which should then void your claim to public office.

Congressional Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Who’s next on Air Force One…Ashley Judd?

Talk about ‘political stunts’

Flying Sandy Hook parents to DC to lobby Congress for gun control was bad enough.

But, of course for Obama and Dems looking to 2014, optics are everything.

That said, we predict Ashley Judd may be the next Air Force One passenger.

While the media ignores crimes of illegal surveillance bugging of political meetings, they no doubt will exploit that poor Ashley Judd was being plotted against by GOP meanies.

After all, she’s a girl, and everyone knows the Republican Party has a war on women…

Bringing In Judd on Air Force One an improper use of taxpayer dollars?

Hey…don’t sweat the small stuff…Obama has a political party to destroy

A mockery of what passes for leadership.

During a speech on gun-control in Connecticut Monday, the Alinskyite-in-Chief ranted against ‘political stunts’ in Congress, decrying GOP filibuster threats.

Political stunts?

What would you call using Air Force 1 to jet Sandy Hook parents to DC?

What would you call scheduling a vote Thursday for legislation that is kept concealed?

(That’s right – taxpayers watch their president flying around the country rallying support and misusing Air Force One… for as yet concealed and unwritten legislation.)

Obama evidently calls that ‘leadership’. Lack of a media outcry means they agree.

Republicans in Congress should fly in their rebuttal…Doug Wyllie, PoliceOne.com editor-in-chief…who just completed an exhaustive 15,000-police officer poll.

That huge cop poll of (verified) law enforcement officers overwhelmingly (by 85%!) confirms our position – more gun control laws will not solve the problem!

All together now…How many Gun Control Laws are obeyed by evil-doers? ZERO!

Chances of MORE laws solving the Gun Violence problem? ZERO!

Political stunts?

Obama & Harry Reid seem to have that market all to themselves right now.

The definition of a split second…

Split-second (n) ‘That amount of time between when a BlueCollar post is published and a political editor takes issue when they disagree’

Said editor emailed, citing Abortion to make her point that (decidedly) ideological issues are in fact ‘solved’ from time to time by politicians, contradicting our previous blog.

(?)

BCP suggests everyone keep in mind that the definitive ‘elected officials’ does not include ‘appointed’ Supreme Court justices…who legislated abortion from the bench.

(And, ever since, anyone in America who’s not brain dead knows that one party still exploits women’s fear of losing that abortion ‘right’ during every election cycle.)

We suggest our hypothesis holds true: elected officials prefer exploitation to solution.

First rule of Politics…get elected.

Second rule of Politics…get re-elected.

Both rules require exploitable issues to get the needed Pull vote, which leads to…

…the Third rule of Politics…never solve an issue which can be more effectively used as Exploitable…in order to achieve Rules 1 and 2.