Is this Kabuki theatrics or serious dialogue going on in Congress?

Those who advocate gun-control should be allowed to make their argument.

That does not mean they should be allowed to contravene our U.S. Constitution.

We are a nation founded and built on the Rule of Law. The very document which gives us that foundation also gives us the means to amend it democratically.

That said, any law Congress proposes must adhere to Constitutional principle, because every elected member of Congress took an oath to uphold that document.

Our U.S. Constitution makes the election process that puts Congressional members in office possible. To rely on the document in order to achieve high office, then shred that same document at will once in office, is the height of hypocrisy, bad faith, and fraud.

So the question remains: Are we witnessing Grand Kabuki or serious dialogue?

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Open message to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi – fish or cut bait!

Present your legislation to change the 2nd Amendment, and follow the process.

To legislate otherwise violates your Oath of Office, and constitutes fraud…

…a crime which should then void your claim to public office.

Congressional Oath of Office:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.“