…and now Hillary implies that women are too stupid to realize their vote is a secret thing

Clinton Blames Her Loss on White Women Listening to Their Husbands

Her contention being that wives were compelled to vote Republican by husbands.

Evidently Hilllary’s under the impression that American women are so stupid they didn’t realize they could vote however they wanted behind the polling place curtains.

(Either that, or she thinks we’re too stupid to realize her comments are illogical.)

Did the ‘Oprah Effect’ bite The View’s Joy Behar in the butt?

Joy Behar finally publicly apologized to VP Pence for her remarks about his Christian religion, but we can’t help but wonder about the motivation behind that apology.

In February on ‘The View’ she mocked his Christian beliefs: “Like I said before, it’s one thing to talk to Jesus. It’s another thing when Jesus talks to you,” Behar said. “That’s called mental illness, if I’m not correct. Hearing voices.”

Now she says “I was raised to respect everyone’s religious faith…I fell short of that…”

Did she ‘fall short’…or was it because she heard Oprah’s remark that she’s waiting to hear from God before making any decision about running for office in 2020?

After all, it’s one thing to mock a Republican…quite another to mock The Oprah.

Put Up or Shut Up, Part II…Eric Holder exposed as a liar-by-innuendo also

Now the only attorney general ever to be held in contempt by Congress joins the typical Democrat anti-Trump smear effort, over the House Intel report clearing the President of Russia collusion…although GOP Rep. Nunes does say Democrats colluded with them.

Now we’re finding out Obama hired Russia-colluding FusionGPS to dig dirt on Romney.

Russia collusion? You bet…too bad it’s the wrong Party where evidence is available…

…otherwise, FakeNews media would be all over it.

If ethics were a criteria for public office, the Democrat Party would be an empty room.

Open Message to House Democrat Adam Schiff – PUT UP…or SHUT UP

Pull quote from Andy McCarthy’s National Review article: “The House Intelligence Committee has concluded that there is “no evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy” between the Trump campaign and the Russian regime.”

But, of course, the Democrat Minority Ranking member, Adam Schiff, sees it differently claiming “…the committee’s Republicans had elevated the interests of protecting the president over protecting the country.” (Translation: he doesn’t agree with GOP findings)

Schiff is notorious as a leaker-extraordinaire…if he wants to claim or IMPLY there may be proof, or evidence that supports his innuendo – why doesn’t he just LEAK IT?

The man’s been leaking non-stop since this House Intel committee investigation began,  so if he doesn’t leak evidence that backs up his cowardly implication…?

Short answer? He’s a tiresome, mewling LIAR.

Everyone in journalism knows this to be fact – when a Democrat con-artist like Schiff doesn’t leak proof that supports their case…it’s because they have NO proof.

ANY Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee that implies they know a different story than the Republican findings should be forced to put up…or shut up…and if they insist on continuing innuendo campaigns, absent evidence to support their claims…

…they should be brought up on ethics charges.

It’s time to stop the campaign of cheap, ad-hominem attacks against a sitting President.

One way, or the other.

How ‘complicated’ can talks with North Korea be? 1) De-nuke? 2) Verify? Nope…it’s where to meet

Fox News headliner: Trump’s meeting with North Korea’s Kim will be historic…and logistically complicated

As the Left’s collective heads explode over the concept that Trump has achieved what their glorious leaders failed to manage for decades, it can only be described as hilarious to declare a meeting location between the President and ‘rocket boy’ as…complicated.

(We’d suggest Guantanamo, but Dear Leader Kim might see that as…suspicious.)

As to the substance of such a meeting, is ‘de-nuke’ and ‘verify’ too concise?

Forget Venezuela…look at Puerto Rico if you want to see a socialism failure

Hey, Puerto Rico – you got the government you voted for – for decades…

…and if the result isn’t making you happy since the latest hurricane revealed your lousy crumbling infrastructure due to crony socialism…you only have yourselves to blame.

Voting for the equivalent of a Democrat Party in that island for decades yielded a close look at what socialism does when applied liberally, and Trump’s administration can’t be blamed for the result – or for the ongoing lousy implementation of repairs now.

We don’t need to look at Venezuela to see Socialism’s failure…it’s right offshore.

When Pelosi damned GOP tax cuts as ‘economic armageddon’ did she mean…for HER Party?

Monthly savings due to GOP tax cuts are “Crumbs”? Bonuses were a “Scam”?

Republican tax cuts will be an Economic Armageddon“?

Nancy Pelosi’s nothing if not hysterical, but her claim of ‘Armageddon’ may prove a worthy prediction…if it’s applied against what could happen to DEMOCRATS this Nov.

NOT ONE DEMOCRAT voted for the tax cuts. They damned the cuts, in concert.

And that will hang around their necks more heavily as the mid-terms draw near.

Now American workers are seeing bigger take-home paychecks, bonuses continue to be doled out, and employment is booming as the American economy expands…

…yeah, yeah…rage against THAT machine, Democrats.

Building a campaign message for mid-term elections

Whether it be in California, or the Nation as a whole…

…then, by all means, vote ‘Democrat’ this November.

Simple, no?

Have California Democrats exposed themselves to a political revolt?

As the Democrats take up their inevitable racist dog-whistle analogies, a new poll suggests they may have more than a little trouble getting that ‘dog’ to hunt.

Breitbart reports: “Poll: Majority of Hispanic, Black Americans Support Trump’s Legal Immigration-Cutting DACA Deal”

More than 60% of hispanic Americans, 55% of black Americans, and 65% of white Americans support Trump’s stand on the immigration and DACA reform issue…

…which begs the question:

Do the Democrats who attack the President’s plan as ‘racist’ consider the majority of Americans, who support his plan, racist as well?

And, if so, does that mean Republicans have a chance to re-take major political ground in – for instance – California, where sanctuary status defies immigration-polling reality?

Midterm elections may be even more interesting than expected.