Felony Child Endangerment is defined as “…(intentional) conduct that places a child in imminent danger of death, (great) bodily injury, or physical or mental impairment…”

Thousands of unaccompanied illegal alien children are lured by Democrat policies (DACA, non-deportation, etc) and rhetoric (Biden – “illegals are citizens too”, et al)…

…knowing full well the implications of those acts (posting bids for escort services of a huge border influx months before the occurrence proves premeditated knowledge).

Yet, guilty of tens of thousands acts of Felony Child Endangerment, Democrats want to now throw the blame and responsibility of such border circumstances at…Republicans?

“Intentional conduct…” If policy, rhetoric, and bid posting doesn’t prove the case…

…WHAT DOES?

It’s illegal for anyone to lure an unknown child into their custody…

…isn’t it illegal to aid and abet luring thousands of kids into a ‘coyote’ smuggler’s?

Talk about pathological…when was the last time you succeeded in working with a liar?

There’s a laugher of an article on a Left-wing site that just typifies the idiocy of Liberals.

The joke lines come almost immediately: “Barack Obama has made clear that he won’t just be concentrating on foreign policy. He’ll be doing whatever he can to achieve domestic goals as well, even if Republicans have made legislating impossible.”

Stopped laughing yet?

With foreign allies scattered by his abuse; enemies going nuclear, and invading nations; al-Qaeda resurgence metastasizing; and the Middle East going up in flames…

…in what Universe has Obama been ‘concentrating on foreign policy’?

He’s deliberately refused to enforce domestic laws he took an oath to faithfully execute; he’s lied about the nature of laws he wants passed (Obamacare, immigration)…

…yet complains ‘Republicans have made legislating impossible’?

Considering current foreign events, it’s a blessing he’ll concentrate elsewhere.

And his complaints of ‘Republican obstruction’ are deceitful. Make no mistake, his actions are deliberate…the last thing he wants is for Republicans to look cooperative.

Polling suggests a majority of the electorate knows he can’t be trusted; the best thing Republicans can do is remind everyone of Obama’s deceit, and lawless behavior…

…and ask those complaining loudest…

…”how can anyone work with a proven (and deliberate) liar and lawbreaker?”

Isn’t it odd that a Democrat-fabricated war-on-women narrative, based on a misleading contraceptive hysteria, amounts to about $30 per month (average) in additional costs…

…yet inflated gasoline costs due to Democrat policy amounts to an extra $120+ per month – minimum – for working women fueling their cars at the local gas station?

(The average American woman uses at least 2 gallons of gas a day to-and-from work, and of course at least that much shopping and transporting kids on the weekend. 60 gallons of gas a month, and paying $2 more per gallon than necessary? Do the math.)

Does that hypocrisy sink in as Sandra Fluke drives to WalMart for her contraceptives?

Shouldn’t women be 3x-4x more angry with Democrats…over their war-on-women?

$30/month for contraceptives = outrage. $120/month extra for fuel = what?…bliss…?

Ms. Fluke says “the Hobby Lobby case is an attack on women.” Really?

If $30/month is a GOP attack (on a few contraceptive-crazed women), then $120/month (on all women drivers) must be a Democrat-waged Thermonuclear War.

Logic is a very inconvenient thing…for Democrats.

Several blogs ago, we suggested Ms. Fluke find a richer boy-toy at K-Mart, who would be willing to finance her $30/month frenzy for contraceptive bliss…

…but, suffering $120/month in over-inflated fuel costs? She needs a WalMart guy…

…and as luck would have it, that’s probably where she gets her jones-fix anyway.

Plainly stated, there is no War on Women…but there is a War on Freedom.

Obamacare wages that war, taking away our freedom to choose coverage and doctors we like (and medicines that work), and push us into healthplan gulags.

Additionally, Obamacare wages a War on Religious Freedom, trying to force coverage of medicines and procedures some religions view as repugnant and anti-life.

The hysteria over a Supreme Court ruling is fabricated to help frantic Democrats across the November election finish line…they desperately want to hold onto Senate control.

Contrary to Democrat hysteria, Hobby Lobby still provides contraceptive coverage…

…they’re just freed from the burden of coverage of religiously objectionable sorts.

Only the foolish, stupid or lazy believe this fabricated ‘war-on-women’ Democrat hype.

News of illegal immigrants dying to get here is sad…when it’s a child, especially so.

The man who orchestrated this border chaos of unaccompanied illegal kids is to blame. And the Democrats who aided and abetted such tragedy share equal responsibility.

Hispanics especially should be outraged that such flagrant disregard for young children is at play in a deadly cynical Democrat effort to pry votes from their electorate.

59% of Americans see this border chaos as Obama’s doing…

…which means the other 41% of Americans are idiots.

A Democrat toadie…errr…Senator says Obama will ‘borrow the power’ to change law.

Unhappy with current immigration law he refuses to enforce…

…now he wants to write law he’s not empowered to write? That’s not his job. His job is to enforce laws that are already written and in place, as legislated by Congress.

He knows that.

There is no ‘executive loan program’ for a president to ‘borrow’ legislative powers…

…but there is a specific Constitutional antidote to prevent such usurpations…

…it’s called ‘impeachment’. And that’s what he wants.

It’s obvious what Obama’s trying to do. His Democrat water-carriers in the Senate are facing a very tough November election prospect…unless their base gets fired up.

If he can force the GOP into talk of impeachment, it might fire up the black voters, who would certainly be upset at the thought of the first black president being impeached.

He’s overloaded the border with illegal immigrants, hoping to fire up Hispanic voters.

He wasted no time using the Supreme Court religious-freedom ruling to fire up women. Already Obama’s flack is saying the ruling jeopardizes women’s health (without noting that women can still buy contraceptives themselves…on average, at $15-$50/month).

He’s probably planning an October-surprise student-loan amnesty, and it wouldn’t be unexpected to hear him promise waiving O’care mandates again, to lure youth voters.

Obama’s playing the only cards he has, with a calculated bluff…in the hopes that his base groups will get fired up enough to turn out in November, so he keeps the Senate.

It’s a balancing act: firing up his base, while not over-heating his opposition’s base.

Republicans need to craft a balanced message that exposes Obama’s cynical efforts.

How hard can it be? The majority of voters don’t like his immigration ploys, see him as a liar, and realize that this sluggish economy – with O’care dragging it down – is his failure.

If the House Republicans wised up and cut off precisely-targeted agency funding, it would be a welcome sign that they’re not going to lay down and take this power abuse.

And they have a powerful closing argument…how does one make deals with a LIAR?

Talk about gall…he threatens to ‘fix’ immigration laws…that HE’S breaking!

Obama obviously doesn’t have Constitutional authority to ‘borrow’ legislative powers…

…and Congress absolutely has Constitutional power to stop funding his abuses.

The House GOP leadership should grow a pair, and start exercising their power.

Just days after data-temp-tampering reports, the NOAA has re-stated 1936 temps.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ‘tweaked’ the numbers to create  a warming trend narrative desperately needed by Obama and ‘warming guru’ Al Gore.

But suddenly and mysteriously, 1936 is now the hottest year on record…again.

Could it be the enviro-whacko billionaires just forgot to make their monthly payment?

Just askin’.

The Washington Examiner pokes fun at Sandra ‘pay-for-my-contraceptives’ Fluke:

“Supreme Court rules in favor of Hobby Lobby; Sandra Fluke hardest hit”

Maybe she just needs a richer boyfriend? How hard can that be?

After all, if contraceptives only cost (average) $15-$50 a month…

…K-Mart should be crawling with possibilities.

For certain politicians, illegal immigration is only about potential voters.

For honest, caring mainstream America, the humanity of the situation cries for solution.

Democrat politicians don’t want border enforcement, and haven’t for decades. Neither are they interested in enforcing anything else that once was ‘immigration law’.

They know that 85-90% of illegal aliens would potentially vote ‘Democrat’ if given that right…until then, they simply keep the issue unsolved…to beat up on Republicans.

Giving amnesty to such a huge group would finish off the GOP…not allowing amnestied immigrants a right to vote gives Liberals the right to scream ‘disenfranchised’.

What to do? The answer is staring us in the face from the Caribbean…Puerto Rico.

BlueCollar solution…designate ‘amnestied’ immigrants as ‘Territorials-at-Large’.

Allow ‘T-a-L’ immigrants the right to vote in local elections, but not statewide or federal elections; in those cases, give them representational status – as we do Puerto Ricans.

After a generation – 25 years – give them an opportunity to acquire full voting status.

America can continue to stumble along, with Democrats blocking border control which threatens our national security (not to mention our health)…or recognize the inevitable.

Offering amnestied immigrants a ‘T-a-L’ status brings them out of the shadows, makes border security possible, drastically reduces disease risks, provides voting privileges on a local scale commensurate with existing national policy, and won’t threaten the GOP.

Republicans should be able to sell this idea to their constituents, as well as any honest Democrats embarrassed by their Party’s sinister use of the destitute for political gain.

And any Democrat politician opposing this plan would be exposed.

Territorials-at-Large…

If it’s good enough for Puerto Rico, shouldn’t it be good enough for amnestied legals?

How is it NOT radical to insist somebody else must pay for their lifestyle?

People who love animals generally don’t choose to work in slaughterhouses…

People who love children generally don’t choose to work in abortion clinics…

People who don’t believe in God generally don’t choose to work as ministers…

…so why is it that ‘radical’ to suggest contraceptive lovers should choose to work at a Planned Parenthood…rather than a business with deeply held religious beliefs?

To do otherwise smells like the atheist who joins the Boy Scouts of America, knowing there’s an oath that includes a belief in God…then sues because they don’t.

Seems like some basic values have been turned around over the last few decades.

In America, we’re free to choose where we work…those wanting free contraceptives are free to choose NOT to work at a Hobby Lobby.

Conversely, if the work environment (or pay structure) of a Hobby Lobby is worth more than your desire for free contraceptives, you’re free to ignore the desire and take the job

Simple, isn’t it?