Enough with the racism.

Condemning America as racist now because of slavery that existed 155 years ago, is like condemning African Americans now for cannibalism that existed years ago.

Give it a rest, people.

As for this National Anthem kerfuffle, few Americans even knew there was a 2nd, 3rd, or 4th verse to the song, let alone knew what the words were to those verses.

Got problems with verses that no one knew existed?

Purge those verses from the Anthem, and then, get on with your life, people.

Let Congress pass a resolution making only the first verse the ‘National Anthem’.

“U.S. Army Mulls over Whether to Give Bergdahl $300,000 in Back Pay“

Back-pay for a deserter?

Is this a joke?

The polls indicate Trump would win by a wider margin if pres elections were held today.

So much for the ‘Russia interfering with elections’ meme we’ve been hammered with.

But, seriously, does anyone understand the significance here?

Despite a year of FakeNews trumpeting a Russia-collusion meme, polling that says they’d still vote ‘Trump’ (or no longer support Hillary) spells out disaster for the media.

Why can’t congressional Republicans grasp that significance?

The one constant over the last year has been support for President Trump.

Yes, blue state Virginia, New York, and New Jersey stayed blue state this last Tuesday. How anyone can interpret what should’ve been a given…as anything but…is lunacy.

But, of course, the FakeNews media interprets the inevitable in those states as a wave,  yet fail to see a wave in the five or six special elections over the last year that WERE.

Virginia went ‘Obama’ twice, and Hillary last year – there’s no way anyone can interpret Tuesday’s results as suddenly representing the rest of America…that doesn’t compute.

What DOES compute is polling that says – a year in – Trump would be elected…today.

Hey, Republicans, here’s an idea…

…try actually cooperating with the President for a change.

Open letter to a Washington Post tweet on ‘universal characteristics of mass shooters’

Your tweet is BEYOND idiocy…and ignores a very salient fact: There actually is ONE constant in every violent crime – a law-BREAKER commits them.

Answer this question, and the gun-control debate is over:

Since it’s obvious that lawbreakers will be the ones involved in criminal activities, what new law, or enhancement of existing laws, will make lawbreakers obey the law?

The Sandy Hook elementary school shooting is a perfect example.

There are existing laws against killing your mom, stealing her guns, transporting guns, breaking into schools, bringing weapons into schools, and shooting people…

…Adam Lanza broke every one of those laws. He killed his mom, stole her guns, drove to the Sandy Hook school with them, broke in with them, and committed mass murder.

Any of the existing laws being followed would have prevented the Sandy Hook shooting.

What new or revised law would’ve convinced Lanza to OBEY the law?

(And, review employment practices…your tweeter should be terminated for stupidity)

DNC’s former chair Wasserman Schulz refused to let the FBI examine the DNC servers as she claimed they were hacked, then claims FBI didn’t try hard enough to view them.

But, of course, that wasn’t until Obama’s FBI director James Comey let the cat out of the bag, testifying under oath in a Senate hearing that the DNC refused to cooperate.

Then she was all aflutter: “How is it that the FBI or DHS or any federal agency that was concerned about a foreign enemy state intruding on the networks of one of the two major political parties did not think it important enough to go higher than a tech support staffer?” she asked. “It is astounding and outrageous.”

No, Debbie, what’s ASTOUNDING and OUTRAGEOUS is that a DNC chair who claims her Party’s servers were ‘hacked’ would wait over a month before telling DNC officers…

…it’s ‘astounding and outrageous’, as DNC chair, you claimed servers were ‘hacked’ by a ‘foreign enemy state’ – yet, somehow, couldn’t make an honest, concerted effort to demand the FBI or the Dept of Homeland Security look at the servers…

…instead insisting a Democrat-paid 3rd party be trusted with the ‘analysis’.

And, it’s ‘astounding and outrageous’ that the FBI would let itself be used this way.

It’s ‘astounding and outrageous’ that a special counsel would be set up to investigate a Democrat claim of Russia collusion based on a Democrat-paid sleaze-document and Democrat-paid ‘analysis’ of a ‘hack’ that wasn’t worthy of being discussed with the rest of the DNC officer group for over a month AFTER the so-called ‘hack’ occurred.

It’s ASTOUNDING and OUTRAGEOUS…

…that Democrats get away with something so TRANSPARENTLY OBVIOUS.

In the Nov 2016 presidential election, Republicans got 44.4% of Virginia votes. In the Nov 2017 gubernatorial election, Republicans got…45% of Virginia votes.

Got that? Republicans picked up 0.6% more votes than they got in 2016. First time we ever heard of an INCREASE of GOP support considered a Democrat wave.

And, yet…

CNN: “Tough night for Trump and GOP sends a message for 2018”

FiveThirtyEight: “Northam’s Virginia win: Is 2016 election finally over for Democrats?”

Bloomberg: “Virginia Win Soothes Democrats and Makes GOP Sweat“

NY Times: “Virginia Rejects Your Hateful Politics, Mr. Trump”

NY Mag: “The Anti-Trump Wave Has Come, and Republicans Can’t Stop It”

Yeah…yeah…GO DEMOCRATS…ride that wave.

Not 45 minutes after we sent Rush Limbaugh a prediction that the Donna Brazile event is a precursor of a Democrat plan for Michelle Obama to run in 2020, he confirmed…

…he thinks so too.

Pretty humbling, to know we out-scooped the Great One – Rush Limbaugh.

(Hey, okay, it was just by 40 minutes or so, but still…)

Donna Brazile is as Left as a Democrat can be, and her anti-Hillary book just released is a clear indicator that something big is being planned for the 2020 national election.

Know this…no one attacks the Clinton dynasty unless a larger story is at work.

We’ll take the first plunge – we think Democrats figure if a businessman can win…

…Michelle Obama can win.

Hillary is being sacrificed on the altar of Democrat clear-the-road strategy. After all, they can play the same drain-the-swamp tunes that Donald Trump played in 2016.

Michelle is (in their mind) not a denizen of the Washington DC swamp and her other definite advantages (First Lady popularity, woman, minority) will be played to the hilt.

You heard it here first.

Buckle up.

Thank you, Nov 8, 2016. It’s been a year, we’re loving the aftermath.

And, good luck, Virginians…you got the governor you deserve yesterday.

The GOP candidate was a swamp-denizen who tried to go Trump-lite without success and got swamped in the process. Republicans can’t beat Democrats with this strategy.

Let the Democrats think the tide has turned…we love the challenge.

Good news is the Republicans will be looking over their shoulder, because one thing was clear based on exit polling – Trump-supporter turnout was way down, and if the GOP reads THOSE tea-leaves, it’s obvious anti-Trump politicians’ days are numbered.

Which, hopefully, will spell out stronger support of the President’s agenda from here on.

The female Russian lawyer who met with Trump Jr. in 2016 should not have been able to get into the country, according to sources, yet did…and met with the FusionGPS  powers-that-be both before AND after that endlessly hyped meeting with Trump Jr.

Yet now, she’s denied immigration papers to get into the country for a court hearing.

Could it be State Dept deep-staters are trying to veil her from investigations?