Welcome to the alternate universe of Dueling Logic

When it comes to circular logic…no one does it better than the Left.

“House, Senate leaders strike spending deal, tie Trump’s hands on shutdown”

(underline emphasis added, here and below)

On the other hand…sub-headline to the article above…

“If the president vetoes it, however, he could force the government to close.”

Got that, his hands are tied…but not.

Glad they cleared that up for us.

Secret Letter? WAIT – Are they using Bruce Ohr as the courier?

“Senate Democrats sending a secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI”

Who didn’t see that coming?

So a ‘secret’ source – who wants to remain ‘anonymous’, won’t ‘come forward’, and doesn’t want to ‘press the matter further’ – not so secretly comes forward to press the matter further by sending a letter to those masters of discretion…Democrats?

Which…we’re guessing (but, with high confidence in the accuracy of said guess)…is meant to leave everyone believing the worst about a Trump SCOTUS nominee.

When it comes to slime-by-innuendo…no one does it better than DiFi-&-Co..

‘Slime-uendo’…newest term coined by BlueCollar, in describing Democrat tactics.

All we need to close the circle here is to learn that Bruce Ohr delivered the package.

Invoke the ‘Obama Rule’ for tennis player Serena Williams

Serena Williams had a meltdown while losing a tennis match recently, and right on cue the Social Justice crowd steps up to declare it’s ‘cuz she’s black, a woman, blah…blah.

A match judge deducted a point from her because of her coach…hysteria ensued. And, though it seems the judge was right, turns out Serena was the victim anyway. Go figure.

Now, judges are talking about refusing to work any match she’s playing.

We suggest, instead, judges invoke the ‘Obama Rule’ first utilized by the Nobel team of judges after Obama’s election…just award any/all matches to Serena BEFORE play.

Hey, why not? Obama was given a Nobel prize before he did anything.

Should her most Royal Highness Serena expect any less?

Why are they lying about deaths in Puerto Rico? F-L-O-R-I-D-A

For those who wonder why FakeNews media would lie about ‘hurricane-related’ deaths in Puerto Rico, the answer should be pretty obvious to anyone with political interest.

FLORIDA. A large percentage of evacuees moved to the mainland, mostly in Florida, and – as residents of that state – now have a right to vote in Florida elections.

So, make Trump look bad (FEMA), stigmatize (by association) the Republican Party, add in a little drama based on disproportionate ‘deaths’, and you get Democrat votes.

But, there’s a boat-load of bad logic and flawed reasoning that needs unpacking here.

1) ‘3000’ deaths being widely reported are based on computer modeling. 2) That ‘modeling’ used variations in an ESTIMATED before/after population. 3) It’s for a period of 5 months after the hurricane hit. 4) The margin-of-error was +/- 3852 deaths. 5) The death certificates of many were altered from ‘non-related’ to ‘related’…months later.

But, putting all that aside, even if the worst-case death estimate scenario was true, how can an American president be responsible for the rotten infrastructure of a Democrat-controlled island that, provably, contributed greatly to an above-normal death toll?

Look at it this way…

If you live in a house for 50 years without making repairs or renovations to an obviously crumbling roof, you only have yourself to blame when a storm makes it fall in on you.

If anything, Democrats should hang their heads in shame, but typically, when their failures are revealed (and with FakeNews media support)…they blame Republicans.

Pathetic…but it just may get them the vote turnout they need.