‘Stupid is as stupid does’...tell that to the voters of failed Democrat-run cities.

Nothing screams failure like Baltimore. “Baltimore has the highest homicide rate among America’s 50 largest cities and the second-highest violent crime rate overall, according to FBI data released in September 2018. There were 342 homicides in Baltimore in 2017, which works out to 56 per 100,000 people residing in the city. On 24/7 Wall Street’s list of the most dangerous cities in the country, Baltimore ranked 3^rd, behind 1^st-place St. Louis, Missouri and 2^nd-place Detroit, Michigan.” (emphasis added)

And, as the President pointed out recently when Cummings insulted border conditions: “Baltimore’s numbers are the worst in the United States on Crime and the Economy. Billions of dollars have been pumped in over the years, but to no avail[,]” the president wrote on Twitter July 29. “The money was stolen or wasted. Ask Elijah Cummings where it went. He should investigate himself with his Oversight Committee!”

When your buddy asks ‘why vote Republican?’ you can respond by citing Baltimore, Philadelphia, Detroit, St. Louis, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta, Los Angeles…

…what better reason?

To ‘reframe’ American history, the NY Times has introduced their 1619 Project, which is designed to establish America’s founding as the year slavery first came to Jamestown.

Never mind that Jamestown was an English settlement at that time; never mind that, as a settlement, it was founded in 1607; never mind America’s founding began in 1776…

…the NY Times project isn’t about accuracy – it’s about stirring up minority anger and resentment before the 2020 election…Democrats rely on victim-hood to get out votes.

Faking history is the only strategy available to accomplish that goal.

REAL history tells us America’s founding was 1776; and abolition began soon after.

An article at the Federalist lays out the case in very clear terms: will it matter?

Does anyone care if Founder documents stated ALL men are created equal; or that legislation by Congress in 1780 banned Americans from employment/investment in international slave trade; or that the 1787 Northwest Ordnance banned slavery in territories that would become Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin?

Congress banned American ship participation in slave trade in 1794; Congress banned importing slaves starting in January 1808; eight eastern-most American states (NY, VT, NH, MA, CT, NJ, PA, RI) legislated abolishing slavery in 1804…

…and hundreds of thousands gave their lives to end that slavery evil in a Civil War.

Our ancestors ended slavery less than 90 years after America was founded. In contrast, it took England hundreds of years, from the 15th century to 1834, to end slave trading.

DEMOCRAT slave states, on the other hand, fought to protect slavery, established the KKK as their militant extension, invoked Jim Crow legislation, fought to suppress black voting and perpetuate segregation…using vile intimidation tactics.

REAL history is a condemnation of EVERYTHING Democrat.

For FakeNews, is it any wonder, then, that Fake history is an essential necessity?

How hard will it be to push back on the NY Times, et al…?

Judicial Watch is still fighting to get answers on Hillary’s emails, and that fight has extended to exactly how her private email system may have compromised Benghazi.

We’ve been posting for three years that very contention, based on inside sources.

Heads should roll, but fighting DeepState delay tactics is a never-ending process.

Hopefully, the real story will finally come out…

…and it won’t be pretty for Democrats because it’s been all about giving them cover on unsecure email usage (allegedly) prompting the Benghazi assault, killing 4 Americans.

Unsecure email usage, we might add, that included Obama’s private accounts as well.

Stay tuned folks.

“Elizabeth Warren Deletes DNA Test Results from Campaign Website”

What about her college degree, and fines for illegally claiming minority heritage?

Her degree obtained under false pretenses should be revoked…

…income, fraudulently obtained as a result of that degree, warrants heavy fines.

It begs the question.

A court ruling (labeled ‘Flores’) says illegals with kids can only be detained 20 days.

We learn today that the Dept of Homeland Security has set up regulatory work-arounds to be able to avoid the necessity of releasing illegal immigrants into the United States.

“DHS Issues Regulation Closing the Flores Catch-and-Release Loophole”

That’s all well and good, but the deeper question remains: Is it really ‘detainment’ when one can leave anytime…if illegals with kids choose to go back home?

After all, ‘detain’ is defined as ‘to hold or keep in or as if in custody’…

…but, if they can leave at any time voluntarily to return to their homeland…

…they AREN’T detained, simply deterred.

But, that said, the ‘work-around’ being set up by DHS involves licensing holding centers.

(The Flores decision specifies 20-day release from non-licensed facilities.)

Heads on the Left must be exploding at this point.

File this under ‘All The News Fit To Print Propagandize’

“We built our newsroom to cover one story, and we did it truly well”

So claims the executive editor of the NY times, in reference to the Trump-Russia hoax.

Pushing a hoax until it collapses under its own weight, without revealing the real drivers behind the scheme, is yellow journalism at its worst…& the NY Times is proud of that?

What about REAL stories not covered: Democrat chicanery; FBI lures; weaponized intel agencies; fraudulent use of FISA courts; illegal surveillance of opposition candidates?

Scott McKay nails that executive editor in his American Spectator article: “Think about that statement for a minute. Baquet says he “built our newsroom” to cover a story which turns out to have been based on a hoax spread by Democrat Party operatives and used by a corrupt Obama administration to spy on innocent American citizens while attempting to prejudice a presidential election. Had the Times actually covered the back half of the Trump-Russia story, in which the abuses by the Obama and Clinton camps turn out to have been the meat of the thing, it might have been justified to “build our newsroom” around it. But of course that’s not what Baquet did.” (emphasis added)

Of course, it all depends on how Bacquet’s ‘covering a story truly well’ is defined.

By Democrat standards…he’s spot on.

By journalistic standards…not so much.

All of the President’s supporters are racist, because of mischaracterized comments.

That’s the stereotyped sentiment of typical anti-Republican Left-wing bomb-throwers; you know – those who scream in rage when there’s any stereotyping done against them.

(Developing…)

*The sure sign their vicious race-baiting canard will continue?

Political data (depending on the state): blacks are 22-40% of Dem primary voters.

These pathetic excuses for candidates are playing to their base, each trying to outdo the other in ‘Trump is a racist/white-supremacist/white-nationalist’ to gain traction.

Which is a definite indication that the race-card play will not let up any time soon.

But while candidates are trying to energize the base against each other to move their numbers up, FakeNews is another story altogether…and a disgusting one at that.

For the disgraceful NY Times et al, it’s all about trying to pull down the President’s poll approval numbers among minorities before the 2020 national election takes place.

Which explains why the Times chief editor wants to push anti-GOP race stories, now that their Russia-collusion hoax has fallen on its face…truth and history be damned.

Enemy of the people? You bet.

*The reason why their race-baiting canard WON’T WORK?

Republicans can push back hard: racist history is Democrat-owned.

They’ll try to guilt us because slavery existed…

…even though the concept was a millenniums old world-wide institution, and even though we fought a Civil War where hundreds-of-thousands died to end it, which they intend (according to latest news) to gloss over or dismiss in its entirety as irrelevant…

…even as Democrat efforts to EXTEND slavery/segregation/Jim-Crow laws continued.

(Which, of course, FakeNews will completely ignore.)

Can’t wait to see how the Tweet’er-in-Chief throws this back at them. President Trump is a master at messaging and brand-positioning; this nasty race-baiting won’t end well…

...for the Democrats.

In 2016, Trump won 8% of the black vote, about 29% of the Hispanic vote.

Today, reports indicate black approval is 28%, Hispanic approval at 51%.

Could be over-use of race-baiting is driving minorities to the President, not away.

Keep it up, Democrats.

As the NY Times now shifts from the Trump-Russia hoax to the Trump-Racist hoax, and every Democrat presidential contender continues their slander, it’s time for a challenge:

Other than out-of-context quotes or actions…

…can they name any time the President verbalized or performed in a racist manner?

Crickets chirping…chirping…chirping…chirping…

That’s right, Nature-lovers…they CAN’T.

But they’re hoping if they out-of-context, flat-out LIE…it can swing minority 2020 voters.

THAT’S.

HOW.

THEY.

ROLL.