‘Fake-cestry’? Hey, it’s working for Elizabeth Warren…

“Government to Scrutinize Contractors Who Claimed ‘Native American’ Ancestry Without Basis” Hmm…maybe they could invoke the ‘Elizabeth Warren’ privilege?

After all, she got into the best schools, and faked her way to political success with it.

If she can profit for personal gain, why shouldn’t companies do it for profits?

Just call it the ‘Warren’ model.

“None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true”

“Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions”

Read it and weep. Climate-change fanatics…check your data.

This article’s first 3 sentences tell the tale: “Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.”

Everything we hear about eco-disaster predictions is based on computer modeling.

E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G

Nothing we hear about eco-disaster predictions has happened.

N-O-T-H-I-N-G

There are only 2 reasons these ridiculous, hysteria-induced claims continue:

  • Chicken-Little useful idiots, manipulated and influenced by
  • Climate-Industrial Complex heavy-invested billionaires

File his proposed ‘CA Federal Homeless Taskforce’ under BRILLIANT

Cue the Judy Garland-like lament: “Typhus & Leprosy & Disease…Oh My…”

No other way to put it…simply brilliant. As reported at Breitbart.com today: “Donald Trump Proposes Federal Homeless Task Force for Los Angeles, San Francisco”

If the Democrat-California leadership reject his proposal, they’re seen as unable to come to grips with reality; if they accept the proposal, they’re seen as incompetent…

…and, either way, the issue is now front-&-centerjust before the 2020 election.

Heritage fraudster Sack-a-ja-Warren promises to ‘end corruption’?

“Warren Says She Can End Corruption, But Her Policies Will Feed It”

Bu that’s only into the future. What about her own past? She made fraudulent claims of American Indian heritage on her State Bar Registration in 1986, among other frauds.

Reportedly, she made claims of such to get into college. When was she NOT corrupt?

So, what’s her pitch? Send the corrupt, to end the corrupt?

#YourLivesDontMatter…how does this convince voters?

During today’s second hour, Rush Limbaugh summed up the amazing Democrat ‘class warfare’ strategy, and how it’s been successful for them as a go-to tactic for decades.

“…what they do, they condition their voters to be happy when they think other people suffer pain. So the Democrats will run around and promise to raise taxes on the rich, and the Democrat voters say, “Yeah! Yeah! You stick it to ’em!” Now, have the Democrat voters’ lives changed? No. Not when Democrats run the show. Democratic voters’ lives – other than the uber-wealthy and the well-to-do – do not change for the better at all under Democrat leadership. The Democrats’ policies are not designed to improve people’s lives. Democrat Party policies are designed to increase their power and the role of government in everybody’s life. It’s not about expanding your life, expanding your sphere of influence and opportunity. It’s about actually making you more and more dependent on them. It’s about turning you into a victim.(bold, u/l emphasis added)

In a nutshell, Democrat politicians create hate-&-anger against the Republican Party…

while not improving Democrat-supporting voters’ lives at all.

Rush says, “They really sell class envy and class hatred. The Democrats know that their policies are not going to raise the economic standard of living for most of their voters. So how do they cover for that? They condition those people to believe that what they have now is pretty much the best it’s gonna get because the game is rigged against them, and that the Democrats are going to go get the people rigging the game.”

It may be too late to expect dyed-in-wool supporters to reject what’s worked on them for decades, but how clued-in Millennials will react to being suckered is worth considering.

Do the Millennials really want to be part of a #YourLivesWontImprove Party?

There should be some clever GOP strategists working this angle before 2020 elections.

Slanderers do not belong in Congress

Slander: (v) “to make false and damaging statements about (someone)”

Politicians in high office who insist on making false and damaging statements about someone should, themselves, be impeached and removed from elected office.

Congress is designed to legislate, i.e., to make laws that are just, to protect citizens.

How, then, can a legislator be entrusted with that serious responsibility if they’re willing to trample rule-of-law to unjustly demonize an American citizen for political purposes?

“Ayanna Pressley to Introduce Kavanaugh Impeachment Resolution”

Got that? She wants to impeach a Supreme Court Justice, based on unfounded rumor.

Pressley says “sexual predators do not deserve a seat on the nation’s highest court.” 

But as widely known, Brett Kavanaugh is (and was) being smeared, slanderously so.

Is rule-of-law important only for citizens, and not elected politicians?

Slanderers ‘do not deserve a seat’ on the Nation’s highest legislative body.

Honest congressional forces should introduce legislation to halt this despicable practice.

On Constitution Day, it’s sad we need to have this conversation, and disgraceful to have to remind Congress the Constitution was meant to ‘insure domestic Tranquility’

…establish Justice…

…promote the general Welfare.

The Preamble is an integral part of our Constitution.

Remember?

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

If Congress won’t take seriously the Constitution they swore to uphold, who will?

On administration shakeups: Chaotic…or Adaptive?

Nothing gets FakeNews attention like a firing in the Trump administration.

He’s ‘chaotic’ and ‘unstable’, you see. He’s several porkchops short of a mixed grille.

Has nothing to do with adapting to external changes in the situation with which the aide or Cabinet level official is involved – nothing ever changes that dramatically, right?

Well…we have an alternate theory.

Call us crazy, but we think it’s just possible that, in any given situation, those opposed to what this President wants to accomplish may be influenced by who’s advising him.

And, being the savvy businessman he is…the President uses that to good advantage.

Take his latest shake-up: John Bolton, his National Security Adviser. The man’s a hard-nosed, no-nonsense conservative, famous for his take-no-prisoners negotiating.

Is it just possible the President wanted to use a bruiser to soften up a foreign opponent before employing a velvet-hammer approach once that tenderizing was completed?

Not if you’re FakeNews…nope, he’s chaotic and unstable. Trust them on this.

(‘Cuz, after all…they’re the professionals…)