Democrat-held strongholds allowing the rioters and looters because they feel the pain of those suffering systemic racism are basically ADMITTING its existence is their failure.

Yet, politicians who own those failures get re-elected…by those who’ve been failed?

Fascinating.

File this under ‘OWNERSHIP…defined’…

…to include the FAILED politicians – and the voters who keep electing them.

New York’s governor is disgusted, that the President wants to use American military against Americans…but those who use criminally violent means aren’t American.

Rioters, looters, and thugs are attacking elderly, anyone carrying an American flag, and anyone with the temerity to try protecting their businesses from senseless destruction.

That’s not the American Way.

America’s a Nation of laws, personal Liberty, and property rights. Any who violate those principles, by definition, puts them at odds with everything that makes us American.

Criminal acts strip them of the right to be defined ‘American’ by any decent standard.

And, just because they may get away with it, and not led off in handcuffs, doesn’t mean they’re any less a criminal…whose American rights get stripped away when convicted.

Even a Democrat should know that.

We can’t expect that much from CNN.

German communist anti-fascist group flag, circa 1930’s…

American Antifa flag circa 2016 to present day…

(courtesy, American Thinker contributor Andrea Widburg)

Any questions?

Here’s what you need to know about Antifa: as her article notes “…its radical ties put it squarely within the new Democrat party. Antifa claims to be anti-fascist, so people think it’s a good organization. It’s not. When fascism appeared in the 1930s, its biggest enemy was communism. This was not because fascism and communism were antithetical ideologies. It was because they were sister totalitarian ideologies, both arising out of socialism, with both competing for the same voters.” (emphasis added)

Andrea’s takedown is brutal: “The easiest way to think about Antifa is to view it as the 21st-century version of the Ku Klux Klan. Back in the day, the KKK was the Democrat party’s terrorist arm. Now it’s Antifa, which is the Democrat Party’s brownshirts…For those who say Antifa is obviously communist, so it has nothing to do with the Democrat Party, think again. Over the past few years, Antifa has been operating freely in Democrat-run cities such as Berkeley and Portland, attacking…anybody it thinks is conservative. In those cities, the mayors have explicitly told their police forces to stand down…the mayors are treating Antifa as a Democrat paramilitary organization that uses violence to suspend citizens’ First Amendment rights to free speech.”

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

Is it possible we’ll soon see George Soros et al frog-marched in a perp walk?

There’s proof that he and his Left-wing cohort fund #Resist anti-Trump activities: if the present unrest throughout Democrat-led cities bleeds back to them, there’s hell to pay.

Talk about blow-back…

Breeding insurrection isn’t lawful, and it’s opened the door to federal intervention.

Andy McCarthy makes a great case for the President to implement the Insurrection Act in all its forms, up to and including the most recent beefed-up federal power expansion.

From that article: “…as a practical matter, when states actually confront a natural disaster or pandemic, governors are quick to plead for federal assistance, rather than fret over what doing so portends for their power over their own affairs. When it comes to violent uprisings, though, federalism concerns are beside the point. Washington has an express constitutional obligation to protect the people of the states, and the republican form of government, from attack.” (bold and underline emphasis added)

(And we’ve been predicting for years that RICO statutes can also be in play.)

Wouldn’t that be ironic? In a desperate bid to re-claim their lost power, they breed the very lawlessness against federal gov’t that proves to be the instrument of their demise.

Now, Pres Trump has it within his power to further erode a DeepState grip on America.

Power…given him by the very people trying to take him down. Wouldn’t you like to be the fly on the wall watching Soros-&-co. at the moment their bank accounts are frozen?

Or, even better, as the handcuffs are slipped on…in early morning armed raids.

Mr. President, time to act.

Faster, sir…please…America is burning.

Naturally, the far Left is blaming rioting and looting on ‘right-wing supremacists’…

…yet, given free rein to conduct that criminality…in far Left-controlled cities?

And, if that’s not schizophrenic enough, now they’re complaining that the federal gov’t will investigate these ‘right-wing’ groups…under domestic terrorism guidance and law?

Why do far-Left controlled cities let so-called right-wing groups go crazy and loot? Why are far-Left talking heads exploding over investigating so-called right-wing groups? Why aren’t so-called right wing groups looting right-wing cities…where they’d be coddled?

Why would Left-wing gov’ts hesitate to crack down…on so-called right wing groups?

Short answer? THEY’RE NOT RIGHT-WING GROUPS.

Regardless of issue, it begs the question…

Is it disingenuous to accuse looters and rioters of hijacking a peaceful protest, knowing it’s being done…yet continuing to hold protests KNOWING it will be done anyway?

Isn’t it odd that ‘protesters’ always seem to choose areas most attractive for looting?

Wouldn’t any honest protester want to neutralize that by holding protests elsewhere, if not for the concern of looters hijacking their issue, then concern for their own safety?

At that point, isn’t it accurate to state failing to do so constitutes aiding-&-abetting?

And shouldn’t local governments be accountable, since they control the venue? Before the typical Leftist heads begin exploding (these are Leftist cities burning), hear us out.

First, cities and towns are within their right to issue protest permits for SPECIFIC areas; especially important to do so, in order to protect the rights (and property) of everyone.

Second, it’s of paramount importance…to minimize escalation.

Issuing a permit authorizing a protest in a specified area that reduces the elements of escalation (crammed spaces, rich stores for looting, etc) would serve that purpose.

Any OFF-SITE looting or rioting could then be handled as necessary, without concern over the safety or freedoms of peaceful protesters…because they shouldn’t be there.

Rioters and looters are criminals…

…providing them cover and opportunity is aiding-&-abetting…and, yes, we include in that charge local government officials, as well as knowing protesters making it possible.

How hard is this to understand?

Protests are a fact of life – when did common sense get thrown aside?