An earlier BlueCollar blog postulated that, if Mueller’s special counsel report was seen as ‘confidential’ BY LAW, it follows that his testimony was restricted by that same law.
But, considering the amount of proven deep-state chicanery Mueller failed to note in his report, our opinion may be short-sighted: GOP queries could be EXPLOSIVE…
…and, after all, asking about his motivations regarding what he DIDN’T include isn’t bound by confidentiality law, since it didn’t make it to that final report…right?
So, by all means, git ‘er done.
Sure, let’s bring Mueller in front of Congress about these glaring omissions. Set dates, arrange the deck-chairs, hand out the opera glasses, and use this list of ignored issues:
- A DOJ official letter notes dossier author bias was known before the FISA apps;
- Human asset lures were operating EARLIER than the FBI’s initiated probe;
- Supposedly ‘hacked’ DNC servers/computers were withheld from FBI analysis, and then the private firm CrowdStrike claiming ‘Russia as culprit’ loses credibility;
- The much-hyped Trump-tower meeting with Russians was an orchestrated setup;
- Revelations that dossier info is potentially Russian disinformation…?
- Revelations over Democrats going to Ukraine for oppo research…?
- Revelations: an opposition-research dirt-dossier was used for FISA warrants…
…yet, none of this obviously important information is in the Mueller Report. Why?
His instructions were to investigate ALL MATTERS THAT MAY ARISE during the probe and yet he ignored the very information that FALSELY predicated the need for a probe.
Put Mueller on the congressional hot-seat, and ask him why he
- didn’t meet simple (normal) prosecute/decline standards for his report;
- failed to address the key issue – special counsel ‘circus’ was falsely predicated;
- felt a need to write a 200-page op-ed instead of ‘no’ obstruction prosecution; and
- omitted HUGE available evidence of deep-state wrong-doing and REAL COLLUSION by Democrat Party leadership, re, Russian disinformation.
We suggest the Senate Judiciary questions him before the House Judiciary meeting…
…then – watch to see if the Democrat-controlled House committee cancels.
Democrats asked for it…Republicans should give it to them.