…and, unhhh…since when is a prosecutor’s job to PUBLICLY provide ‘context, nature, & substance’ of work?

BlueCollar was first to point this out, but the Federalist contributors come on strong.

The prosecutorial hit-job known as the Mueller report is unraveling as we blog, and may actually create the storm of a further investigation…into special counsel misconduct.

A special counsel is tasked with determining if a prosecution or declination is needed…

…but in 440+ pages destined for public scrutiny, Mueller provided a smear report.

Prosecute ‘collusion’? Yes, or No. Evidence supporting prosecution? Yes, or No.

Prosecute ‘obstruction’? Yes, or No. Evidence supporting prosecution? Yes, or No.

Four questions, four answers – and if evidence exists, supporting documentation.

440+ pages? It should’ve only taken ONE.

And when there’s no decision to prosecute, because there’s no evidence, it’s not his job to provide ‘context, nature, and substance’ in what can only be a blatant editorial smear.

There’s a lot of questions about the Mueller report…but on this issue, his intent is clear.

Hopefully, that’s going to provide ‘context, nature, and substance’for another probe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *