With news that the sleaze-doc used as a basis for the phony Trump-Russia collusion meme was nothing more than smears funded by Democrats, Mueller should resign.

As the Washington Examiner points out “In a court of law when it is discovered that evidence has been contaminated or a witness is lying, that evidence is thrown out and a jury is instructed to ignore the witness testimony…the document that launched the Russian collusion investigation against President Trump must accordingly be thrown out.” (emphasis added)

Maybe…in a normal world.

But the world Mueller lives in has been anything but normal.

From this point on, we can think of only one reason for Mueller to keep going…to cover the tracks on any other matters that need obscurity, to protect his Democrat enablers.

Attorney General Sessions should not sit idly by waiting for a resignation.

As the Examiner sums up “After more than a year of turning up no evidence that Trump colluded with Russia, and now equipped with new revelations that the Trump dossier was nothing more than a paid campaign piece, there is more than enough reason to justify disbanding the witch hunt once and for all.” (emphasis added)

You think? Besides, Mr. Mueller…everyone knows where the ‘witch’ is now.

We posted yesterday that the FusionGPS concession that exposed Hillary and the DNC as funding the sleaze-doc is only the beginning, and they’re hiding bigger chicanery.

What (or who) is more important than Hillary and her sycophant DNC?

Kimberly Strassel channeled BlueCollar today…“The Coming Russia Bombshells“… 

…she notes that the subpoena for FusionGPS bank records is still being considered by the court, and posits that the release of funding details was simply a ploy to hide other players FusionGPS has been working with – Swamp Demons are swimming for cover.

Hillary is yesterday’s news. The DNC can be thrown under the bus because they were Hillary sycophants (Debbie Wasserman Schultz was a HUGE shill of the Clintons), and the ‘new’ DNC can claim plausible deniability (and distance from yesterday’s news).

So, who/what can be a bigger ‘protectee’ than Hillary and her DNC?

For starters Barack Obama, and the heavily-invested Democrat deep-state embeds throughout key agencies in gov’t. Then there’s billionaire backers like Soros and Steyer. And, maybe, just maybe, FakeNews media heavyweights desperate to stay hidden?

With the possibles involved, it’s not unreasonable to see a Party break-up in the mist.

Buckle up – if those bank records are exposed, all hell’s gonna break loose.

All during the faux outrage over a false narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, there have been those who declared a foreign attack on our democratic process as outright war.

If so, and we’ve learned Democrats funded that foreign attack, what’s that make them?

We believe Left-leaning journalist Charles Blow may have changed his name.

“The Menace of Trumpism“

In a politically-charged Washington DC, the current President who HASN’T weaponized every government agency from the IRS to the DOJ against Americans…

…the President who demonstrates complete respect for the Constitution…

…is a ‘menace’.

It’s no mystery why we believe this journalist was originally surnamed “Blowhard”.

Barack Obama has demonstrated how to ‘legally’ spy on political opponents. The trick was to layer efforts, creating barriers and zones of separation using legal loopholes.

Looking at the Trump-Russia hillarydoc (aka, ‘dossier’) as a means of delegitimizing the President is a one-dimensional aspect of a much larger picture, as pointed out here.

As the FrontPageMag author notes, “Opposition research isn’t a crime. A conspiracy to eavesdrop on your political opponents however is very much a criminal matter“.

Those who wonder why we continue to include Obama in this fiasco should understand that the Department of Justice answered to the President…not the Hillary campaign.

Because unmasking occurred, led by Powers, Rice, Rhodes, etc, and the FISA warrant procedures that came into play by the FBI used the hillarydoc to justify eavesdropping.

Democrats want everyone to focus on bit players…but Barack Obama was their leader.

“A forensic examination of the dirty dossier’s journey shows us that this…was a collaborative effort between an outgoing Democrat administration and its expected Dem successor. The effort was broken up into two big pieces. The Clinton side would generate the material. The Obama side would make use of it. Steele was positioned as the interface between the two sides of the effort.“

Daniel Greenfield’s article is riveting, scary, and well worth the read.

His closing note is, to say the least, dire: “The left’s networks are becoming increasingly malignant. They executed a sophisticated attack on the political process while contriving to blame it on their victims. What the attack reveals is just how much the levers of power in our political system are embedded in the shadowy networks that operate in and around government. And what those networks are willing to do to win.”

To not deal with this, through every legal channel available, is criminal negligence.

We’ll say it again – R…I…C…O

Were Hillary’s campaign and the DNC the only funders of the hillarydoc (aka ‘dossier’)?

Or did they expose some funding information…to hide BIGGER chicanery?

(Update) Told you…“The Coming Russia Bombshells”…it ain’t over yet.

This is rich…a month ago…

…Hillary’s campaign chair John Podesta and DNC chair Wasserman Schultz told a Senate Intelligence Committee they didn’t know who was funding FusionGPS.

Get this – In that meeting, Podesta was sitting next to his lawyer, Marc Elias…the guy who the Washington Post just reported ARRANGED the FusionGPS funding.

“Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier”

Did we mention Podesta was Hillary’s campaign chair, and Schultz was DNC chair?

Could it be these two Democrats LIED to a Senate Intelligence Committee?

Say it ain’t so.

(Interesting side note: John Podesta was Obama’s top White House adviser until Feb 2016, and left that position to take over as Hillary’s presidential campaign chairman.)

There’s an old saying that, to get to the bottom of something, it’s important to get all the liars in the same room – looks like that Senate committee had them, and didn’t know it.

Or…did they?

Can’t wait for the FakeNews spin on this.

If Trump Jr’s unfulfilled opposition research meeting with a Russian national is ‘treason’ by Democrat-Left standards, surely FINANCERS of Russian opposition lies qualify?

After all, attempting to subvert an American election is a serious matter, and when using Russian assistance to achieve that dastardly effort, what else would one call it?

Which means Hillary and her DNC cohort should be indicted, post-haste. And Obama may not have been a financer, but by unleashing his FBI, he certainly was an enabler, so that will include him, his Attorney General, and James Comey in a treasonous act.

The House of Representatives should be impeaching them as well. After all, they were public officials at the time, their treasonous acts qualify, and they should never again hold public office or positions of public trust. Impeachment guarantees that.

Democrats are on record for what they think passes for treason, so we have no doubt they’ll be on board, and (maybe with some reluctance) bow to the inevitable, right?

LET THE GAMES BEGIN.

Headline: “FEC Complaint Alleges Hillary, DNC Broke Election Law By Not Disclosing Trump-Russia Dossier Funding”

Says it all, no further comment needed.

We’ve established that the so-called ‘alt-Right’ groups are really Left-wing activists; both Spencer and Kessler have been outed as Obama-supporting Leftists several times.

Now, in the Virginia governor race, Democrats are trying to paint the Republican who’s running as a white supremacist, “superimposed above a photo of white nationalists“…

…but, as we’ve already pointed out – those white nationalists are Democrats!

In effect, Virginia Democrats are smearing a Republican…by calling him ‘Democrat’.

You-Can’t-Make-This-Stuff-Up