“No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation…”

Art.I, Sect. 10 of our Constitution begins with that line.

California and New York governors seem intent on violating the Constitution’s clear intent and declaration, entering into an alliance with European and Asian nations.

These states’ citizens should demand recalls of any governor violating law.

Especially so, considering the fake narrative of ‘climate change’ hinges on lies, and computer modeling of data that has no scientific foundation for input or accuracy.

And, especially so, when you understand their acts are driven by billionaires heavily invested in the fake narrative, feeding at a government trough of huge subsidies.

Multi-billionaires Tom Steyer and George Soros want the cash spigot left open, and their lapdog governors are happy to oblige…even if violating Constitutional law.

All state governors have the same oath of office, that starts off with “…support and defend the Constitution of the United States…”

Recall, anyone?

Isn’t it odd, how the Left dismisses a cold reality of Hillary’s hacked classified emails while hyperventilating over a pure fiction of our election being ‘hacked’?

The election process consists of 1) casting a vote, and 2) counting the votes, so…

• How does one hack casting votes…that are not cast online?
• How does one hack counting votes…that are not counted on line?

Yet, oddly, as the fiction such a concept remains, the sham-stream media hammers away, while dismissing entirely the fact that Hillary Clinton gave foreign agents free entry into the classified Top Secret realm of our American government.

These are strange times indeed.

We salute the American, British, and Canadian forces for their heroic resolve.

Now comes word a 25-year old Georgia woman has been arrested and accused of leaking NSA classified data regarding ‘Russia’s election-hacking efforts’.

Our previous post reminded us the CIA has an internal group tasked with recording the hacking signature techniques of foreign agents, and uses those very same tags to misdirect their own CIA hacking efforts by appearing as foreign gov’t hacks.

Now, a Georgia female NSA contractor leaks info outlining Russian hack efforts, and is there any doubt the sham-stream media will hammer this relentlessly?

(Surprise, she’s a Bernie Sanders anti-Trump activist as well. Hired as an NSA contractor, given a Top Secret clearance…who vetted her, John Podesta?)

And naturally, the media reports it as straight-up Russia hack attempts, without the reminder that the CIA has the capability to misdirect attribution of hacking efforts.

We suspect more of the same to continue, and the timing smells fishy.

Just days before the much-anticipated Comey testimony on Capitol Hill, a leaker who printed out and mailed a classified document to a news outlet is detained, and even the Washington Post thinks the ‘leaker’ was unusually sloppy in her efforts.

While the Post marveled at a curious lack of secrecy the leaker displayed, nowhere was it mentioned that the NSA document itself might not be what it appears to be.

So, we have a looming Comey testimony, an extraordinarily inept NSA ‘leaker’ being arrested, with a sudden appearance of an ‘NSA document’ about Russian hacking?

Did we mention the fishy smell?

(No doubt the leaker will invoke the Hillary Clinton defense. Hey, it worked before.)

Remember the March 7 release of ‘Vault 7‘ from WikiLeaks?

It detailed information on the CIA’s global hacking process, and its internal group (code-named Umbrage) that identifies and logs foreign malware ‘technique’ tags.

The CIA hacking process includes use of those technique tags, in order to misdirect analysts of foreign (and domestic) services trying to determine malware sources.

As noted in the Vault 7 release…

“With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.”

Translation? Even if ‘foreign’ hacking attempts are uncovered, with such a capability it’s going to be impossible to determine if it was foreign agents involved…

…or our own CIA, up to their spy-vs-spy tricks again.

Of course, the sham-stream media and Democrats have a system for that…

…if damaging for Democrats, it was our CIA, trying to make them look bad…

…if it can hurt Republicans, it was Russians trying to help the GOP win elections.

Great news for Republicans…

Pres Trump has been given the ‘green light’ for surveilling Democrat leadership, given their lack of concern over Obama’s tactics…

…we can only assume.

Political grandstanding aside, why do Republicans care what Comey has to say?

Considering his links to Hillary and the cash-reaping Clinton Foundation, it’s a wonder the GOP let him be effective at whitewashing Hillary’s email escapades.

Comey manufactured a completely bogus ‘intent’ theory to get Hillary past the email scandal that would’ve implicated Obama as well…who cares what he says now?

(Other than Democrats, of course, willing to use any useful idiot to distract the GOP from doing their job and – heavens forbid – actually govern.)

America’s favorite Socialist codger, Bernie Sanders, doesn’t mind raking in the cash.

We knew he was ‘green’, just didn’t realize it was the cash shade of green.

The only difference between America’s ‘antifa‘ rioters and London’s version of terror is the American version has yet to take the final step of yielding deadly weapons.

Their agenda is based on a lie, and they’re becoming more violent every day. Our liberal cities need to step up law enforcement, or the result will be disastrous.

Washington state and Oregon need to take heed – London is as liberal a large city as can be, and if terrorists are willing to take advantage there…they’ll do it here.

Just sayin’.

Evidently, according to the current DC mindset, being a political opponent when one is a Democrat means never being prosecuted…regardless of unlawful activities.

Hillary Clinton broke federal laws while Secretary of State, but because she’s got a (D) after her name (and because Obama violated the same laws), wasn’t indicted.

Obama weaponized American intelligence agencies against Republicans, and was exposed as doing so this last week, but what the GOP will do about is unknown.

In both cases, if the Justice Dept doesn’t indict them, Congress should at least impeach Clinton and Obama, as well as any other guilty political appointees.

Why? Because as elected public officials, they violated the public trust, one of the most egregious acts a duly-elected public official can be guilty of committing.

Both are provably, demonstrably guilty…we know it, and they know it.

Once impeached, they can never again “…hold and enjoy any office, trust or profit under the United States…”, and that’s the least they should be made to endure.

And it at least would be some comfort to those Americans whose trust was violated.