Rush Limbaugh is beyond incredulous today, that GOP insiders didn’t see Obama for the Leftie he was when elected in 2008, and didn’t see liberal policies coming.

And, he makes a point, that no Republican voted for Obamacare so Democrats own it.

Sorry if we’re not consoled by that sad reality.

Problem is, when it comes to bad policy, Democrats never end up ‘owning’ anything.

Democrats are the Party of the KKK, segregation, Jim Crow, and Bull Connor. Yet, the black population supports this Party in HUGE numbers, every election cycle.

And Kevin Williamson drives the point home on National Review Online: “‎Everywhere it has been tried, the Democrats’ dependency agenda has been a social and economic catastrophe for black Americans.”

Everywhere Democrat policies prevail, the black population has suffered: 2x the jobless rate, 2x the dropout rate, 4x the abortions, 7x the prison sentences…and a net average household worth of $4,995…less than that of the average household in India!

And yet, black Americans support the Party that oppresses them by 90% at the polls.

So, when anyone – even Rush Limbaugh – say the Democrats own bad policy…

…does it matter?

History shows that the Democrat Party won’t be held accountable for that ownership.

With Obamacare, what you see is NOT what you get.

This law never was meant to be a self-sufficient process.

Otherwise, why would the law be written in a way that allows penalty dodging? After all, the penalty for not buying healthcare insurance is a primary funding mechanism.

Experts say the only way IRS penalties are exacted is from the law-dodger’s annual tax refund. But all a dodger would have to do is under-withhold on his paychecks.

At the end of the year, if there’s no tax refund, no IRS penalty can be exacted.

Why would Democrats write a law that could be so easily thwarted?

A GOP amendment to O’care forced Congress and top aides into health exchanges.

Seemed only fair…the GOP point being that, if Congress passed a law that forced Americans into exchanges, then Congress should share the same pain.

In the Obamacare health exchanges, if you make over $36k you don’t get a subsidy.

Congress screamed, because it would cost them out of pocket.

Obama’s OPM team changed laws so Congress gets subsidized with tax dollars.

Private citizens making over $36k/yr – forced into exchanges – get NO subsidy…

…but Congressmen in exchanges – making $174k/yr – get subsidized with tax $$.

Democrats are trying to pass this off as no big deal, saying private sector employees get their healthcare paid for by their employers, so their subsidies are similar to that.

But it’s not the same thing…

…private sector employees with employer-paid health plans aren’t in the exchanges.

Democrats can try that argument all day long, and get a pass from the national media, but as usual they’re lying – the comparison is not accurate and obscures reality.

The reality is the GOP-forced amendment in Obamacare law pushed Congress into exchanges to feel what Americans who were forced into exchanges would feel…

…but Democrats demand and received subsidies that regular Americans can’t get.

Clearly, they just don’t feel they should be subject to the laws they pass.

Time reports Hillary Clinton is trying out potential 2016 campaign themes.

We suggest…

“Been-dodging Benghazi”

Yesterday, Sebelius was asked if she was going to resign because of O’care failures.

Her response “I don’t work for the people who want me to resign” reveals the liberal mindset…she’s paid by taxpayer dollars, but doesn’t work for the taxpayer.

She works for Obama.

The liberal mindset is that taxpayers serve the government. Therein lies the problem.

A NJ Democrat congressman called a House hearing on the O’care website failure a ‘monkey court’, refusing to yield when asked, because he was mocking the hearing.

We’ve heard of a ‘kangaroo court’, never heard of a ‘monkey court’…

Imagine the uproar if a Republican called a hearing over Obamacare a monkey court.

Of course, since it was a Democrat, crickets are chirping…

July 11th, BCP said Obama’s disregard for law would negate any Democrat promises.

Now Senator Rubio voices that sentiment, noting that Obama’s bad faith during recent gov’t debt-&-funding negotiations creates distrust that probably is insurmountable.

Rubio knows any Republican willing to support immigration reform would only do so if strong enforcement is a part of it, but none of the GOP trust the Executive will enforce it.

So, through bad faith during negotiations, and a demonstration of total disregard for the law on quite a few issues, Obama has created an aura of distrust that negates efforts.

This is a deliberate tactic to freeze Republicans in their tracks.

Obama’s got nothing to lose…he’s not on the ballot. He wants control of Congress.

GOP lawmakers will justifiably dig in their heels…earning mainstream media’s wrath.

Watch this get put into play throughout the next year, with every voter bloc: Women (birth control), Hispanics (immigration), Blacks (voter ID), Youth (pick the issue).

Republicans (rightly) won’t trust negotiations, will be portrayed as obstructive, and – if they fail to properly strategize rebuttals now – will lose those voter blocs next November.

Better than rebuttal – go on offense now, with each of these voter blocs, by using the House to pass resonating pro-bloc legislation that negates Democrat objectives.

T’were best done quickly.

We knew Senate Democrats up for re-election would start dodging Obamacare.

CNN’s Dana Bash tweets every Democrat Senator up for re-election in 2014 will back a delay of the individual mandate in O’care (she refers to it as the ‘enrollment deadline’).

On August 12th BlueCollar predicted they’d be running from O’care before elections.

Democrats & Obama chose the shutdown when the GOP sent out appropriation bills crafted to delay the individual mandate (and demanding Congress not exempt themselves from Obamacare). Looks like Democrats forced that pain for nothing.

Judging by Bash’s choice of verbiage, expect the national media to avoid an ‘individual mandate’ label (which would validate what the Republicans were demanding all along).

They’ll use ‘enrollment deadline’ or less invasive labeling that shies from an ominous ‘mandate’ tone. But whatever they call it, it’s the individual mandate they’re disavowing.

Every GOP lawmaker should be stepping to the microphones to capitalize on this bit of news, reminding the American voter that this was the Republican policy Democrats fought against, refused to negotiate over, and thus chose to shut down the government.

They should press every Democrat to disavow their exemption from this hated law, and demand an answer why Democrats put Americans through this shutdown travesty.

Strike while the iron is hot.

Looks like the citizens of Arkansas don’t watch network news…more blame Democrats and Obama for the shutdown than blame Republicans.

Are there more states out there that steer clear of NBC?

“White House stonewalls questions about Obamacare repair”

Paid Liar Spokesman Jay Carney won’t say who’s being hired to fix the O’care website.

Considering the line of sewage that was flowing during Obama’s ‘oh-my-gosh, who-can-we-blame’ speech about Obamacare on Monday, we’re suggesting… Joe the Plumber.

Joe may not be a streaming-data expert…

…but he knows how to deal with gushing excrement.