There are 30-40 reasons why Obama’s Benghazi failure still matters

Despite Hillary’s shrill “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

…despite Nat’l Security spokesman Vietor’s “Dude, this was 2 years ago”

…Benghazi failures still matter…and there are 30-40 reasons why.

They’re called ‘SURVIVORS’, Barack. (You know, the ones you’re hiding?)

Because, while much of the media attention focused on the 4 who were killed that night, there were 30-40 more Americans in harm’s way, who were also abandoned by Obama.

Sending in American military may not have helped the first two, who were killed at the beginning of the assault. But Doherty and Woods were killed many hours later.

If Obama had done his job as Commander-in-Chief, they could have been saved.

Failure to order a military response was a death warrant for them, but the media forgets it could have been a death warrant for the 30-40 who did survive as well. And they have a right to know why this president turned his back on them, risking their deaths also.

McCarthy has a definitive article on Obama’s dereliction of duty, spelling it out clearly.

But still, he doesn’t touch on those who should be demanding an account from Obama.

Before, at the start, and during the attack, no one had any idea how long it would last, or how many Americans would die if help wasn’t sent in time.

To imply now, some 19 months later, an accounting is no longer needed, is heretical.

Answering for Doherty and Woods won’t bring them back to life, but…

…there are 30-40 Americans who need to know why they were left to die by Obama.

Only the President could have authorized American military assistance.

It could have been your son or daughter…your mom or dad…in that group.

So, for that matter, every American should be demanding that answer as well.

 

 

The 500-lb gorilla in America’s immigration debate…

Oh look! Yet another story of a politician posturing on the immigration issue.

But, before anyone bashes Jeb Bush for “…including members of his own party…” in his remarks about federal government failure to take ‘real steps’ to address immigration challenges, it might be a good idea to look at his actual Facebook comment.

The LA Times seems to be churning mud – Jeb Bush didn’t attack his own party. As usual, the Left-wing media takes any opportunity to create GOP controversy where there’s none…while avoiding the real story on this issue: Democrat intransigence.

It’s obvious that illegal immigration challenges need to be dealt with.

It should also be obvious that those challenges cannot be overcome until Democrats join with Republicans to FIRST ensure America’s borders are secure.

After all, what good is any law if it doesn’t stop the flow of illegals crossing the border?

Just as importantly…what good are any laws if a President refuses to uphold them?

As long as Democrats can keep the issue alive, the Hispanic vote favors them.

Toothless laws, and refusing to uphold effective laws, keeps the issue open.

But you’ll never see the mainstream media make mention of that.

Proof that Obama & Co lied about Benghazi ISN’T the big problem…

New emails forced into the open by a Freedom Of Information Act request reveal that in fact, Obama’s team priority was about his image, rather than telling Americans the truth.

Lying to Americans to protect Obama’s image before the 2012 election is reprehensible.

But the BIGGER problem?

The deceiver orchestrating the lies is now #2 in Obama’s National Security Council!

An image-maker is the #2 official in the NSC, advising/assisting Obama on foreign policy and national security issues, and interacting with counterparts of other nations.

How much credibility does anyone have, when they allow image to trump honesty?

At the very least, he should be forced out of the National Security Council.

But then again, he just mirrors what this entire administration does.

The Democrats’ war on low-income families

Ironically, Democrats seeking escape from Obamacare failures are focusing on income inequality, trying to deflect voter irritability away from them and back onto the GOP.

We say ‘ironically’, because as economist Thomas Sowell points out, income inequality has grown substantially over the last five years…as a result of Democrat policies.

Next time your Liberal buddies cry ‘income inequality’…remind them who to blame.

“…unfit to be the ruler of a free people”

What name popped into your mind?

The entire quoted sentence reads as follow: “A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

(Declaration of Independence, 4th paragraph)

And while you may have thought ‘Obama’, the subject of that line was King George III.

There do seem to be parallels…

“…character…marked by every act which may define a Tyrant…”

Which executive order do you think qualifies Obama in this category?

O.U.T. – O.F. – T.O.U.C.H.

Obama claims the Obamacare debate is over.

He says we should move on to focus on jobs and the overall economy…

…evidently oblivious to the fact that Obamacare is a huge job-killer, that sucks even more money OUT of your pocket and, thus, OUT of our economy…

…and into a Big Government black hole.

H-e-l-l-o’o’o’o…

Focusing on repealing O’care directly addresses issues of jobs, and the economy.