A popularly-elected Congress has represented a true voter mandate for over 220 years.

So the next time Obama (or your Liberal buddy) complains that Republicans in Congress won’t do things his way, ask them who voted Republicans into office.

Obama may have a mandate given him by playing ‘electoral’ games…

…but every Congressman is directly elected by voters of their state.

We guarantee, if asked…

…few-to-none of the electorate that voted ‘Republican’ did so thinking ‘cooperate with Obama’ was high on their radar…quite the opposite was most probably the case.

They were voted into office to represent a ‘Republican’ agenda…the only one in political office who fakes any surprise by that appears to be Obama.

Think about it…

…if Obamacare specifies the contraceptives it will cover, what happens if they fail?

Will Uncle Sam (i.e., YOUR tax dollars) get hit with a paternity suit for unwanted kids?

Democracy-loving Americans are irrelevant if they remain silent as Obama reigns.

Press this point, to encourage their relevance…on election day.

On June 29th we asked if Mexico should be billed for the border chaos.

After all, that nation relaxed their southern border, allowing the migration of tens of thousands of illegals from Central America through, then across 1800 miles of roads.

Looks like a majority of Americans agree with BlueCollar.

Obama’s approval numbers have tanked, despite all the media efforts.

During the run-up to the ’04 presidential election, long-time journalist and political guru Evan Thomas noted that help from mainstream media was worth 15 points in polling.

Now Obama’s ranked ‘worst president’ in our modern era…despite that so-called 15-point support advantage supplied him by his fawning, adoring media coverage?

So, look at Obama’s tanking numbers, and subtract the 15 points his flunkies provide.

If it weren’t for them, he’d be down in the teens, poll-wise.

And that’s ‘Worst.President.EVER‘ territory.

If Chicago can’t stop gun violence…with the toughest gun-control laws in the country…

…it should tell you those Liberal gun-control laws aren’t solving the problem.

(Unless of course you’re VP Joe Biden, in which case more laws are needed.)

The GOP-led House is planning to sue Obama for his lawless acts.

They’re afraid of being demagogued by Obama’s media sycophants if they impeach or use their power of funding control to correct the lawlessness, so fall back on litigation

But, even if a court did rule against Obama, his Justice Dept minions are responsible for enforcing the judgment: thus, Obama has to execute enforcement against…Obama.

Fat chance. House lawyers pushing this ‘sue’ effort are deluding themselves.

Suing is not an answer. Boehner and House GOP leadership want a political solution, when there are already Constitutional solutions in place (impeachment, or defunding).

Then there’s the argument of ‘legal standing’, which establishes injury has occurred as a result of Obama’s illegal actions. House lawyers say usurping its legislative powers is an ‘injury’, but courts have ruled political power deprivation doesn’t constitute standing.

House lawyers plan to ‘demonstrate the lack of private plaintiff’. But every taxpayer is overburdened unfairly when Obama illegally refuses deporting illegal immigrants…

…and every taxpayer is overburdened when illegal O’care subsidies are handed out.

And the U.S. Military in Afghanistan is targeted by senior commanders he released from Guantanamo…not to mention America’s national security, when terror visits our shores.

House lawyers are wrong on another point also…a political remedy is Constitutionally available – the House GOP simply fears political repercussions if they enact them.

Finally, nobody’s considered the fact that if the Congress can sue an Executive branch for not fulfilling its role to ensure ‘Laws be faithfully executed’, then, conversely…

the Executive can (just as frivolously) sue the Congress…

…for its failure ‘to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper’.

The House GOP should stop playing games, and exercise its Constitutional rights.

Obama’s pivoting from ‘income inequality’ messaging…

…because his policies INCREASED the income inequality for millions of Americans!

(Hat tip and constant ‘thank you’s’ to Thomas Sowell)

In what could be interpreted as Poll-Dancing, the FundRaiser-in-Chief will be in Texas for – yep – fundraising, but (sigh) can’t find time to photo-op with his illegal home-boys.

Why Poll-Dancing, you ask? Because polls show the reason for his border-shyness… Americans are up-in-arms over his scandalous use of illegal kids as election pawns.

Whether his child-endangerment scheme gets Democrats the Hispanic vote in the Nov elections remains questionable, but clearly most Americans see the chaos for what it is.

So, of course Obama will shyly dance away from that image.

Strange, isn’t it…?

…Democrat election hopes depend on creating misery by putting illegal kids at risk.

Simply put, if Hispanics are okay with endangering kids…they’ll vote Democrat.

Seeing article number 7-zillion about sad illegal alien families, with photos screaming that America shouldn’t be tearing their family unit apart, begs the question…

Wasn’t it the illegal who did that, upon deciding to slink into America?