The ‘Hissyfitter-in-Chief’ refused to call and congratulate Netanyahu last night.
Any bets on how long Israel’s prime minister fretted over that?
(Our bet is Bibi’s got a call-block on Obama anyway…and Obama knows it.)
BHO continues to give new meaning to ‘nuanced diplomacy’.
The media and Obama need a remedial lesson in basic English. By definition, the one who betrays a trust is the TRAITOR…not the one who fulfills that trust.
Obama is negotiating with Iran without the Constitutional ‘advice and consent’ of the Senate, even as they reminded him of that obligation, asking to be included.
Obama’s presidential oath to ‘preserve, protect, and defend’ the U.S. Constitution is being broken – he betrays trust of Americans, and is being false to his sworn duty.
Senator Cotton (R) posted an open website letter to Iran, reminding its leaders that our Constitution gives the Senate ‘advice and consent’ powers.
Obama and his media minions branded Senator Cotton as a ‘Traitor’…
…but Merriam-Webster disagrees:
traitor (n): one who betrays another’s trust or is false to an obligation or duty
patriot (n): a person who loves and strongly supports or fights for their country
By fighting for our Constitution, Senator Cotton is the patriot.
By betraying our Constitution and his sworn duty, Obama is the ‘traitor’.
Some say it was a mistake to post the letter addressing Iran, that it should have been posted to Obama – but it would have been played down as partisan politics.
Posting to Iran rubbed the Left (and its fawning media) raw, gaining notoriety.
Predictably, Left-wing media and Democrats began frothing at the mouth, and in their haste to spew bile, ignored basic English required even in ivy-league schools.
Well played, Senator Cotton.
As the Obamacare babble continues, the Supreme Court now must decide if “…established by the state…” does or doesn’t mean established by the state.
Obama’s lawyers argue that ‘state’ was just euphemistic jargon for ‘federal’, in that they were interchangeable entities, really, meaning the same thing.
But there are two entities involved in this law’s creation…the federal government, and the individual states. How can a state be a state in some areas of the bill, yet by their logic also mean the federal government in other areas of the same bill?
Easy answer…it can’t – but that doesn’t fit the Obama narrative.
So black is white, up is down, and ‘state’ is ‘federal’.
End of lesson.
As a charity event, Mitt Romney will get in the ring with Evander Holyfield.
Word of advice to Mitt: when Holyfield lifts his gloves…BACKPEDAL RAPIDLY!
(And, whatever you do, don’t bite his ear in the clinches.)
Obama accused politicians (who didn’t support his global-warming concepts) as being ‘shills for the oil companies’…since, of course, it’s okay to shill for Solyndra.
Maybe he hasn’t read the article today where a group of applied mathematicians and scientists basically assert that warming-truthers have lost the scientific debate.
But he’s okay with that, so long as Big Green Donors like Steyer still kick in cash.
Daily Caller HEADLINE:
“Green Energy Causes Record Spike In Electricity Prices”
And Obama admits, with his policies, prices will ‘necessarily skyrocket’.
For those least fortunate, the effects are devastating.
Very few of them appreciate the ride on THAT skyrocket.
Just post something like…
‘Honey, I’ve been freeing those pesky squirrels you’ve been trapping.’
When you don’t get any serious blowback, you know the truth.
The real Racist oppresses a class (race) of people, through their actions.
We disagree with Rush Limbaugh, when he says the best way to deal with those who accuse Republicans of racism is “not to reply at all.” There is a better way.
Facts.
The KKK, Jim Crow laws, and Bull Connor oppression tactics were spawned in the South by Democrats, implacably determined to keep a black population from voting.
Since Democrat agenda pushed policies through in the ’60’s, blacks have suffered from dramatically higher income gaps, child poverty, and out-of-wedlock births.
Since ’07 when Democrats took over Congress, and ’09 when they won the White House, blacks have suffered double-digit job losses and household income decline.
And, for those who argue the last 50+ years of policies which have so negatively affected the black community were ‘well-meaning’, a question must be answered…
…when the graphs on these devastating policies starkly showed their grim trend lines, why weren’t corrections made in the first decade…or the second…
…or the third…or the fourth…
…OR AT ALL?!?
Actions do speak louder than words…the history of one Party screams ‘Racist’.
Which Party do you think deserves that label?
If issues of child poverty, education, household income, and jobs are so crucial, why would decades of negative trends benefit the Party causing the problem?
Of course, if keeping that Party in power by race-baiting is the primary value…
…then by all means, black community…keep voting Democrat.
Another day, another Foreign Relations stooge claiming the proof that, by writing an open letter to Iran, ‘Republicans hate Obama more than they love America.’
Why doesn’t the obvious ever get spoken?
Since, FIRST, Obama refused to include Congress in his ‘negotiations’ with Iran…
…then by the same Foreign Relation standard noted above, wouldn’t it be just as easy to say, by Obama doing so, he hates Republicans more than he loves Iran?
After all, the Constitution mandates Legislative Branch involvement, but…
(For the sake of accuracy, isn’t it logical to state only love for Iran could motivate a world leader to push for the #1 terror exporter to acquire nuclear weapons?)
Would you encourage your kids to give their school bully brass knuckles? No?
Then why encourage the world to give a global terror-exporter…nuclear weapons?
Case closed…America’s president hates Republicans more than he LOVES Iran.
Hey…don’t blame BlueCollar…we’re just using the Liberal standard.
Neat trick…
A GOP senator just spoke against birthright citizenship on the Senate floor…