As the Obamacare babble continues, the Supreme Court now must decide if “…established by the state…” does or doesn’t mean established by the state.

Obama’s lawyers argue that ‘state’ was just euphemistic jargon for ‘federal’, in that they were interchangeable entities, really, meaning the same thing.

But there are two entities involved in this law’s creation…the federal government, and the individual states. How can a state be a state in some areas of the bill, yet by their logic also mean the federal government in other areas of the same bill?

Easy answer…it can’t – but that doesn’t fit the Obama narrative.

So black is white, up is down, and ‘state’ is ‘federal’.

End of lesson.